Automated Device for Asthma Monitoring (ADAM)

December 8, 2014 updated by: Hyekyun Rhee, University of Rochester

Developing an Automated Symptom Monitoring Device for Adolescents With Asthma

This study will examine an innovative strategy to monitor asthma symptoms by using existing technology to develop a non-invasive device for monitoring asthma symptoms in adolescents. Using an iPod as a platform, and current sound data analysis techniques, a prototype device will be developed that will directly monitor the chosen parameters of asthma symptoms, including wheezing, coughing and activity levels. This small non-invasive device will be continuously carried by or placed in close proximity to the adolescent on a daily basis. It is hypothesized that such a device would be acceptable to adolescents and would lend accuracy and objectivity to symptom assessment; something that existing monitoring strategies have yet to achieve. It will also stimulate the adolescents' partnership in asthma self-monitoring and ultimately lead to effective asthma management.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Prior research has generated compelling evidence that programs promoting self-management can reduce morbidity and improve asthma outcomes in children. Successful asthma management strategies require patients' active commitment to engage in care processes by establishing self-monitoring routines. Adequate self-monitoring of asthma symptoms is considered to be the cornerstone of appropriate asthma management leading to fewer cases of asthma exacerbation and acute care visits as well as better functional outcomes and higher quality of life in children and adolescents. Symptom monitoring informs patient decisions to initiate necessary self-management behaviors (e.g., adjust medication, alter activity level, alter the surrounding environment or seek medical assistance) as well as the providers' decisions related to an appropriate treatment course such as step up, no change or step down therapy. Thus, current guidelines by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Expert Panel Review 3 (EPR3) highlight the importance of ongoing symptom monitoring.

Studies of children have raised concerns about adequacy and effectiveness of current methods of asthma self-monitoring including symptom-based and peak expiratory flow (PEF) monitoring. Symptom-based monitoring relies on the individual's symptom perception which is subjective and influenced by a variety of factors such as the patient's emotional status, social influences (e.g, family, peers) and previous experiences with symptoms. Thus, the accuracy and objectivity of this monitoring method is uncertain. As an objective approach, PEF monitoring has been encouraged, yet the efficacy of this method has also been a subject of ongoing debate in the literature. Poor adherence and inadequate technique further diminish the clinical usefulness of PEF monitoring. Thus, the uncertainty of current monitoring strategies underscores the imperative of an alternative symptom monitoring strategy that addresses the issues of accuracy and objectivity of symptom assessment.

Adolescence is an important period for consolidating and establishing self-management of and adjustment to chronic health conditions. Yet an array of developmental challenges including the desire for normalcy and peer approval, feelings of invulnerability and emerging independence undermine adolescents' motivation and behaviors to engage in self-management and present particular difficulties in achieving optimal asthma control in adolescents with asthma. Parents become less able to manage asthma as children reach adolescence and many researchers and clinicians have reported similar difficulties in managing asthma in adolescents primarily due to inadequate adherence and counterproductive behaviors. Thus, clinicians face serious challenges in providing optimal management for adolescents with asthma primarily due to difficulties in soliciting patients' active partnership in asthma management with sustainable and reliable symptom monitoring routines. Accurate symptom monitoring by patients is the most fundamental antecedent to effective asthma management, yet existing monitoring strategies have not been conducive to adolescents' cooperation or yielded accurate or clinically useful information. Having recognized these limitations, this study will examine an innovative strategy to monitor asthma symptoms that stimulates adolescents' partnership and ultimately leads to effective asthma management.

The device will directly monitor the chosen parameters of asthma symptoms, including wheezing, coughing and activity levels. A mobile phone will be employed as a platform for processing, analyzing and storing data transmitted from a microphone and a wireless accelerometer. This new approach is developmentally appropriate, given adolescents' affinity for technology and its capacity to address adolescents' need for maintaining normalcy while allowing continuous asthma monitoring during real-life situations. The device involves biomedical engineering techniques enabling automatic sound and activity recording, analysis, feedback, and storage function. A mobile phone will be employed as a platform for processing, analyzing and storing data transmitted from a microphone and a wireless accelerometer. This technology will automate daily symptom monitoring with minimal intrusiveness and maximum accuracy, thereby reducing the risk of inappropriate treatment and ameliorating asthma-related disability. Due to its foreseen safety, noninvasiveness, objectivity, convenience, user-friendliness, and cost containment, the approach can greatly enhance asthma management by adolescents and health care providers. This device has the potential to bring about patient behavior changes such as avoiding triggers and adjusting medications as the device will provide the opportunity for in-time review of symptoms.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

84

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14642
        • University of Rochester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adolescents between the ages of 13-17 who received care at Strong Memorial Hospital, Rochester NY.

Description

Inclusion Criteria: Asthma Group

  • Age 13 through 17 years,
  • Asthma diagnosis from a care provider,
  • Prescribed asthma controller medication

Inclusion Criteria: Comparison(Non-asthma)Group

  • Age 13 through 17 years,

Exclusion Criteria: Asthma Group

  • Other health conditions (e.g., heart disease, cystic fibrosis) producing asthma-like symptoms,
  • Known cognitive, psychological and behavior problems (based on self-report and/or clinician report) that present challenges in following study procedures
  • Ability to understand spoken and written English.

Exclusion Criteria: Comparison(Non-asthma)Group

  • Other health conditions (e.g., heart disease, cystic fibrosis) producing asthma-like symptoms,
  • Known cognitive, psychological and behavior problems (based on self-report and/or clinician report) that present challenges in following study procedures
  • Ability to understand spoken and written English.
  • Asthma diagnosis from a care provider,

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Adolescents with asthma
Ages 13-17 with an asthma diagnosis-both symptomatic and non-symptomatic- and with currently prescribed asthma medication.
Both groups of adolescents (asthma/non-asthma)wore a prototype ADAM device for 7 days as they went about their usual daily activities. At night, the device continued to monitor symptoms as it was placed in close proximity to the adolescent's head during sleep. The asthma group answered survey questions about the status of their symptoms and their usage of asthma medication every morning and every evening- entering their answers directly onto the monitoring device.
Adolescents without asthma
Ages 13-17 without an asthma diagnosis and without any other respiratory condition that presents with asthma-like symptoms.
Both groups of adolescents (asthma/non-asthma)wore a prototype ADAM device for 7 days as they went about their usual daily activities. At night, the device continued to monitor symptoms as it was placed in close proximity to the adolescent's head during sleep. The asthma group answered survey questions about the status of their symptoms and their usage of asthma medication every morning and every evening- entering their answers directly onto the monitoring device.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average Number of Coughs Per Hour
Time Frame: 7 days
The device is supposed to detect and count the number of coughs per 24 hours and register the numbers into the device.
7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hyekyun Rhee, PhD, RN, PNP, University of Rochester School of Nursing
  • Principal Investigator: Mark Bocko, PhD, University of Rochester Electrical Engineering

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

October 1, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 10, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2014

Last Verified

December 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on Automated Device for Asthma Monitoring (ADAM)

Subscribe