Amodiaquine-Artesunate & Artemether-Lumefantrine Efficacy in Burkina Faso

July 29, 2015 updated by: Tinto Halidou, Centre Muraz

Efficacy of Amodiaquine-Artesunate (ASAQ) and Artemether-Lumefantrine (AL) for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Falciparum Malaria in Nanoro, Burkina Faso

This is a two-arm study aiming at recruiting 150 patients to assess the efficacy of Amodiaquine-Artesunate (ASAQ) and Artemether-Lumefantrine (AL) in patients with a microscopy positive diagnosis of malaria in Nanoro, Burkina Faso and assess the performance of the Rapid Diagnosis Tests (RDTs) compared to the microscopy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Study background and purpose

  • Resistance to usual drugs was widespread and has required a change of the malaria treatment by several countries
  • Several countries have changed their first-line treatments to ACTs; mainly AL and ASAQ. & have adopted the use of RDTs prior to treatment
  • Indeed, this contributes to decrease the number of unnecessary treatments and thus improve the management of malaria cases.
  • In February 2005, Burkina Faso changed its national drug policy from Chloroquine to Amodiaquine-Artesunate (ASAQ) and Artemether-Lumefantrine (AL)
  • the country has also implemented the strategy of using the Rapid Diagnosis Tests (RDTs) for the diagnosis of malaria prior to treatment
  • Though endemic countries are being encouraged to implement RDTs, choosing a particular RDT is not easy as several brands are available on the market.
  • In addition, little information on the performance of RDTs in Africa is available and recently quality problems have been reported with some RDTs.
  • In this context, it is important to locally assess the performance of RDTs compared with the microscopy, which is the gold standard for the malaria diagnosis and to assess the efficacy of the new drugs used for malaria treatment

This is a phase IV two-arm randomized open-label study aiming at recruiting 150 patients to assess the efficacy of ASAQ and AL in patients with a microscopy positive diagnosis of malaria in Nanoro, Burkina Faso and assess the performance of the RDT compared to the microscopy

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Boulkiemdé
      • Nanoro, Boulkiemdé, Burkina Faso, 218
        • Clinical Reaserch Unit

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 90 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age above 6 months,
  • eight above 5 kg;
  • Positive blood slide (parasitaemia ≥ 2,000/μL to 200,000/μL) with Plasmodium falciparum monospecific infection ;
  • Fever (axillary temperature above 37.5 °C) or history of fever in the preceding 24 hours;
  • Haemoglobin value above or equal 5.0 g/dL
  • Signed informed consent;
  • Willingness and ability to comply with the study protocol for the duration of the trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participation in any other investigational drug study (antimalarial or others) during the previous 30 days
  • Known hypersensitivity to the study drugs
  • Severe malaria
  • Danger signs: not able to drink or breast-feed, vomiting (> twice in 24hours), recent history of convulsions (more than 1 in 24h), unconscious state, unable to sit or stand;
  • Known intercurrent illness or any condition (cardiac, renal, hepatic diseases) which would place the subject at undue risk or interfere with the results of the study.
  • Severe malnutrition (defined as weight for height less than 70% of the median NCHS/WHO reference)
  • Known pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Amodiaquine-Artesunate
ASAQ is produced by Sanofi-Aventis as CoarsucamTM and as artesunate-amodiaquine Winthrop®
If necessary, the study drug will be crushed, dissolved in water and squirted into the mouth using a spoonful. Administration of the treatments will be directly observed. After drug administration, patients will be kept for at least 30 minutes in the clinic. A dose will be repeated in full if vomiting occurs within 30 minutes of administration and halved if vomiting is between 30 minutes and 1 hour post dosing.
Other Names:
  • ASAQ Winthrop, Coarsucam
Other: Artemether-Lumefantrine
AL (tablets containing 20 mg of artemether and 120 mg of lumefantrine) is produced by Novartis
If necessary, the study drug will be crushed, dissolved in water and squirted into the mouth using a spoonful. Administration of the treatments will be directly observed. After drug administration, patients will be kept for at least 30 minutes in the clinic. A dose will be repeated in full if vomiting occurs within 30 minutes of administration and halved if vomiting is between 30 minutes and 1 hour post dosing.
Other Names:
  • Coartem, Riamet

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of treatment failures
Time Frame: 28 days
The rate of the two ACTs treatment failures at day 28: all treatment failures, both parasitological and clinical (positive blood slide at day 28)
28 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
RDT performance Vs microscopy
Time Frame: 28 days
The proportion of discrepancies between the RDT and the microscopy results
28 days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fever clearance time (FCT) Fever Clearance Time
Time Frame: 28 days
Fever clearance time will be defined as the time (in days) from the time of the drug administration to the first two consecutive measurements on 2 different days of axillary temperature below 37.5°C
28 days
Gametocytes carriage
Time Frame: 28 days
Gametocytes carriage including the estimation of the prevalence and density
28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Halidou Tinto, PharmD, PhD, IRSS/Centre Muraz

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

October 2, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 31, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2015

Last Verified

July 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malaria

Clinical Trials on Amodiaquine-Artesunate

3
Subscribe