Interobserver Variation in Applying a Radiographic Definition for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

December 20, 2012 updated by: Bin Du, Society of Critical Care Medicine, China

Interobserver Variation in Applying a Radiographic Definition for ARDS: Impact of a Training Set of Berlin ARDS Definition

The original American-European Consensus Conference (AECC) definition of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) required bilateral infiltrates consistent with pulmonary edema on frontal chest X-ray (CXR), but there is poor inter-observer reliability in interpreting CXR using this definition among intensivists and radiologists.

As a result, the newly published Berlin definition of ARDS specified that the CXR criterion should include bilateral opacities consistent with pulmonary edema not fully explained by effusions, lobar/lung collapse, or nodules/masses on CXR.

In order to improve inter-observer agreement, the panel have also developed a set of CXRs judged as consistent, inconsistent, or equivocal for the diagnosis of ARDS.

The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of this training set on inter-observer reliability in applying the radiographic definition for ARDS.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study is composed of 3 phases:

Phase 1: All participants will be required to independently interpret a set of 12 CXRs, as provided by the consensus panel. The possible radiographic interpretations include consistent, inconsistent, or equivocal for the diagnosis of ARDS.

Phase 2: Training materials adapted according to the recently published Berlin definition of ARDS, with its expanded rationale and interpretation of all 12 CXRs, will be sent to all participants.

Phase 3: The same set of 12 CXRs, in different order, will be sent to all participants for interpretation for the second time.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

286

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100730
        • Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Intensivists working in the participating ICUs

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • intensivists working in the participating ICUs

Exclusion Criteria:

  • those who could not participate both questionnaire surveys
  • those who have read the reference with the training set of CXRs before the study
  • those who have already known the objective of the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
inter-observer agreement in the interpretation of CXRs for the diagnosis of ARDS
Time Frame: immediately after reading the CXRs
immediately after reading the CXRs

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Impact of the training set on the inter-observer agreement on the interpretation of CXRs
Time Frame: difference of inter-observer agreement before and after the training course
difference of inter-observer agreement before and after the training course

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bin Du, MD, Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 6, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

October 11, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 21, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2012

Last Verified

December 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Training and education

3
Subscribe