Web and Shared Decision Making for Reserve/National Guard Women's PTSD Care

February 21, 2019 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development
Women and Reserve/National (RNG) Veterans are among the fastest growing groups of new VA users. While PTSD is prevalent in this group, most women don't access or complete needed treatment. This study will investigate Operation enduring/Iraqi Freedom and New Dawn (OEF/OIF/OND) RNG female war Veterans' perceptions, preferences, barriers and facilitators to accessing VA mental health (MH) and evidence-based PTSD psychotherapy. This information will be used to revise an existing web-based screen that educates participants about their unique post-deployment MH conditions. This web-interface will then be used to randomly assign women who screen positive for PTSD to either 1) a concierge nurse case manager who uses shared decision-making to engage Veterans in EBP or 2) usual outreach to determine what engagement approach women prefer. The investigators' findings will provide VA leaders with key information to understand and improve access to RNG PTSD treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Women and OEF/OIF/OND Reserve/National Guard (RNG) war Veterans are among the fastest growing groups of new VA users. Although PTSD is highly prevalent in this group of Veterans, most choose not to seek care for a variety of reasons. Facilitating access to mental health (MH) services for RNG OEF/OIF/OND female Veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is challenging and requires new approaches to outreach. Such approaches are urgently needed to mediate the severity of post-deployment MH conditions, alleviate concerns over MH diagnoses, and interrupt the cycle of chronicity found in many with PTSD. This gap between need for and use of VA PTSD services suggests that further research is needed to understand specific barriers to VA mental health (MH) care and VA PTSD evidence-based psychotherapy (EBP). A web-based interface tailored to consumer needs has the potential to promote active engagement by Veterans in their health care. Considering that OEF/OIF combat Veterans enrolled in VA care report a preference to seek readjustment services or information over the internet, such an approach may have important advantages for engaging this group. Furthermore, evidence indicates that when patients are educated about their physical health conditions and treatment alternatives, shared decision-making results in increased treatment participation, better adherence to treatment recommendations, and better health outcomes. Although highly promising, web-based and shared-decision making approaches to facilitating VA MH treatment utilization are in need of further study.

In Phase 1 of the project, the investigators will use qualitative methods to assess VA enrolled PTSD positive OEF/OIF/OND RNG female war Veterans' perceptions, preferences and barriers and facilitators to accessing VA MH services and evidence based psychotherapy (EBP) for PTSD. This information will be used to refine the investigators' existing web-based interface to better address these issues. Satisfaction with the revised interface will then be assessed. Phase 2 will focus on comparing the efficacy of two approaches to promoting VHA initiation. Participants who screen positive for PTSD on the web interface will be randomly assigned to: 1) Study concierge nurse case manager (NCM) facilitated shared decision making to assist with VA MH evaluation and treatment; or 2) existing outreach (current standard of care). Follow-up assessments will be conducted at 6 and 12 months to determine whether and where participants sought MH care (from both VA and non-VA resources).

This study will provide valuable insights about this population's perceptions of VA MH services and of PTSD EBP, as well as their evolving use of VA and other community resources to address PTSD and other post-deployment MH needs. Furthermore, it will provide important information regarding the efficacy of relatively inexpensive and resource-sparing interventions that can be readily implemented within existing and emerging (e.g., Patient Alight Care Teams [PACT]) models of VA care delivery. While the proposed web interface and shared decision-making intervention are currently directed at RNG women Veterans post-deployment, there are clear implications for expansion to other populations and health/MH concerns, as well. Findings have important policy implications for several operational partners heavily invested in the improved access and delivery of evidence-based mental health care for Veterans with PTSD.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

171

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Iowa
      • Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52246-2208
        • Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • R/NG servicewomen who have returned from deployment in service of and/or to Iraq/Afghanistan within the last 60 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any disability that would impair individuals ability to provide consent and participate in the interview.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Outreach
To evaluate and test differences in VA mental health care engagement for those who screen positive for PTSD by randomly assigned route: existing OEF/OIF/OND outreach. VA mental health care engagement is defined as participation in any of the following: PTSD psychotherapy, cognitive processing therapy, or prolonged exposure therapy.
Experimental: Nurse Care Manager (NCM)
To evaluate and test differences in VA mental health care engagement for those who screen positive for PTSD by randomly assigned route: Study concierge nurse case manager (NCM). VA mental health care engagement is defined as participation in any of the following: PTSD psychotherapy, cognitive processing therapy, or prolonged exposure therapy.
Nurse care manager interventions with telephone implemented shared decision making protocol compared to outreach as usual OEF/OIF/OND outreach.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With VA Mental Health Care Engagement
Time Frame: Outcome measures are assessed at baseline interview and within 6 and 12 months following this semi-structured telephone interview .
VA mental health care engagement is defined as participation in any of the following: PTSD psychotherapy, cognitive processing therapy, or prolonged exposure therapy. To be identified in VA electronic medical record
Outcome measures are assessed at baseline interview and within 6 and 12 months following this semi-structured telephone interview .

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Activation Measure
Time Frame: Outcome measure was assessed at baseline data collection
The Patient Activation Measure (PAM) administered on line to RCT participants yields a patient activation score allowing comparison of patient activation with other populations/studies The PAM-13 item measures patient knowledge, skill, and confidence for medical self-management. It is scored on a scale from 0-100. These scores result in four levels of patient activation that range from 1 to 4 with 1 being the lowest level of patient activation for taking action and 4 the highest level of activation. Specifically: 1=believing the patient role is important. 2=having confidence/knowledge necessary to take action. 3=actually taking action to maintain/improve one's health. 4=maintaining health actions, even under stress. The percentage of participants in each arm who had a PAM score that indicated a level of activation/taking action (levels 3 and 4) will be identified.
Outcome measure was assessed at baseline data collection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anne G. Sadler, PhD RN, Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 21, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

October 19, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 22, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on PTSD

Clinical Trials on Nurse Care Manager (NCM)

Subscribe