Piperacillin/Tazobactam for Empirical Therapy of Febrile Neutropenia

April 16, 2014 updated by: Wenrong Huang, Chinese PLA General Hospital

A Prospective, Randomized, Open Label Study of Piperacillin/Tazobactam Versus Imipenem/Cilastin for Empirical Therapy of Febrile Patients With Neutropenia After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Neutropenia is very common in patients received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, with median duration of about 14 days. In 2010 update, IDSA recommended Piperacillin/tazobactam as first-line mono-therapy for febrile patients with neutropenia of high risk. In china, the data of piperacillin/tazobactam for febrile neutropenia after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is very limited.

The current study will evaluate the efficacy of piperacillin/tazobactam compared with imipenem/cilastatin for febrile neutropenia after transplantation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

  1. Swab culture (skin, pharyngeal, nasal, anus) when administered into laminar flow room after transplantation.
  2. Randomize the febrile patients into 2 groups.
  3. Therapy group receive piperacillin/tazobactam, 4.5g q6h iv. Control group receive imipenem/cilastatin, 0.5g q6h. Duration will be 5-10 days.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

123

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100853
        • Chinese PLA General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 65 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 13-65 years
  • received Autologous or Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
  • ECOG score 0-1.
  • ICF is available.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergic to any therapy drug.
  • Documented infection before neutropenia.
  • Renal dysfunction.
  • Suffering from central nervous system or mental disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: piperacillin/tazobactam
4.5g q6h, 5-10 days
Other Names:
  • Tazocin
Active Comparator: imipenem/cilastatin
0.5g q6h, 5-10 days
Other Names:
  • Tienam

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical success rate.
Time Frame: 3 weeks after beginning of empirical therapy
Resolve of clinical symptoms and signs, without change of therapy.
3 weeks after beginning of empirical therapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Microbiologic success rate
Time Frame: 3 weeks after beginning of empirical therapy

Microbiologic success includes eradication, suspected eradication, and super-infection.

  1. Eradication or Presumed eradication: the baseline pathogens no longer present on the culture performed after completion of treatment. If no way to collect biologic sample(s) after treatment;, e.g. sputum, a presumed eradication will be concluded
  2. No eradication: one or more baseline pathogens were persistent
  3. Relapse: the baseline pathogens transient absence reappeared during the therapy
  4. Alternative: the baseline pathogens were eradicated, but new ones appeared without any clinical signs and symptoms
  5. Re-infection: the baseline pathogens were eradicated, but new ones appeared with clinical signs and symptoms.
3 weeks after beginning of empirical therapy
Adverse effect
Time Frame: 3 weeks after beginning of empirical therapy
The number of patients developed unexpected medical information at the 3 weeks after beginning of empirical therapy.
3 weeks after beginning of empirical therapy
Cost of drug and therapy
Time Frame: 3 weeks after beginning of empirical therapy
3 weeks after beginning of empirical therapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: wenrong huang, Doctor, employee

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 4, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

October 26, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 17, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2014

Last Verified

April 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neutropenia

Clinical Trials on Piperacillin-tazobactam combination product

3
Subscribe