- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01740193
Comparison of Two Different Pain Management Techniques in Pediatric Patients Undergoing a Hernia Repair
Randomized Prospective Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Surgeon Performed IIlioinguinal/Iliohypogastric Blockade With Ultrasound-Guided TAP Blockade in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Unilateral Herniorrhaphy on an Outpatient Basis
The purpose of this research study is to find the best way to decrease pain in children right after surgery whom have had their hernia fixed. Right now, there are two different ways surgeons and anesthesia providers try to decrease pain. It is not clear if one way is better than the other. The method used is often chosen by which one the doctor has more experience using. The Investigator plans to find out if one of the methods is more effective and/or safer than the other method.
The results of this study will help learn how to best control pain in children having surgery for hernia repair.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ohio
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
- Cincinnati Children's Hosptial Medical Center - Liberty Campus
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The subject is male or female;
- The subject is of any racial and ethnic groups;
- The subject is age 12 months to 10 years (inclusive);
- The subject weighs more than 8.0 kg (inclusive of the eighth kilogram);
- The subject is scheduled for the following: Unilateral herniorrhaphy scheduled on an out-patient basis, and not being performed in conjunction with any other surgical procedures;
- The subject is American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) patient classification I-II
- The subject's legally authorized representative has given written informed consent to participate in the study and when appropriate, the subject has given assent or consent to participate.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Additional surgical procedures are being performed concurrently;
- The subject is ASA classification > II;
- The subject has pre-existing allergies to local anesthetics;
- The subject receives midazolam as a premedication;
- The subject has an imminent life threatening condition that impacts the ability to obtain informed consent;
- The subject has any other condition, which in the opinion of the principal investigator, would not be suitable for participation in the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: TAP Block
|
While the terminal branches of T7 to L1 cannot be visualized under ultrasound as they pass between the internal oblique and the transverse abdominis muscles, they are expected to lie within this plane.
The three muscular layers of the abdominal wall, however, can be easily identified under ultrasound guidance.
A needle is advanced under ultrasound guidance towards the fascial plane that separates the internal oblique and the transversus abdominis muscles, at which point local anesthetic is deposited under direct visualization.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric blockade
|
Ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric blockade is performed as an injection after palpation of the anterior superior iliac spine followed be a perceived loss of resistance with insertion of the needle, or may be infiltrated locally following herniorrhaphy exposure as anatomic landmarks can prove to be difficult to locate in the anesthetized pediatric patient.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Efficacy Outcome
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of post-anesthesia care unit stay, an expected average of 2 hours
|
Worst FLACC score observed in the post-anesthesia care unit by the research coordinator during the first post-operative hour
|
Participants will be followed for the duration of post-anesthesia care unit stay, an expected average of 2 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Efficacy Outcome - Length of Recovery Room
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the length of the surgical procedure, an expected average of 1.5 hours
|
time required for the patient to meet discharge criteria
|
participants will be followed for the length of the surgical procedure, an expected average of 1.5 hours
|
|
Confounding Variable - Electrocautery
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the length of the surgical procedure, an expected average of 1.5 hours
|
whether or not cautery was used as a measure of surgical technique
|
participants will be followed for the length of the surgical procedure, an expected average of 1.5 hours
|
|
Confounding Variable - Surgical dissection
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the length of the surgical procedure, an expected average of 1.5 hours
|
length of surgical procedure as an indicator of the extent of surgical dissection performed
|
participants will be followed for the length of the surgical procedure, an expected average of 1.5 hours
|
|
Confounding Variable - Length of time for TAP
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the length of the surgical procedure, an expected average of 1.5 hours
|
length of time required to perform TAP block
|
participants will be followed for the length of the surgical procedure, an expected average of 1.5 hours
|
|
Efficacy Outcome - Post-operative Calls
Time Frame: participants will be followed for 48 hours after procedure
|
Phone calls made to surgeons regarding parental concern of post-operative pain forty-eight hours post-operatively
|
participants will be followed for 48 hours after procedure
|
|
Outcome Measure - Number of patients with post-operative complications
Time Frame: participants will be followed for 48 hours after procedure
|
presence of post-operative complications
|
participants will be followed for 48 hours after procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jamie Furstein, CRNA, DNAP, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Niraj G, Searle A, Mathews M, Misra V, Baban M, Kiani S, Wong M. Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing open appendicectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Oct;103(4):601-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep175. Epub 2009 Jun 26.
- Fredrickson M, Seal P, Houghton J. Early experience with the transversus abdominis plane block in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Sep;18(9):891-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02591.x. No abstract available.
- Aveline C, Le Hetet H, Le Roux A, Vautier P, Cognet F, Vinet E, Tison C, Bonnet F. Comparison between ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane and conventional ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks for day-case open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Mar;106(3):380-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq363. Epub 2010 Dec 21.
- Fredrickson MJ, Seal P. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for neonatal abdominal surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009 May;37(3):469-72. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0903700303.
- Groudine SB, Fisher HA, Kaufman RP Jr, Patel MK, Wilkins LJ, Mehta SA, Lumb PD. Intravenous lidocaine speeds the return of bowel function, decreases postoperative pain, and shortens hospital stay in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Anesth Analg. 1998 Feb;86(2):235-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199802000-00003.
- Hadzic A, New York School of Regional Anesthesia.: Textbook of regional anesthesia and acute pain management. New York: McGraw-Hill, Medical Pub. Division; 2007.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2011-1778
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain
-
Boston Scientific CorporationRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Leg Pain | Intractable Pain | Chronic Leg PainUnited States
-
Qi's ClinicNot yet recruitingNon-Cancer Pain,Musculoskeletal Pain,Chronic Pain,Acute Pain
-
Flowonix MedicalApproved for marketingBack Pain | Leg Pain | Trunk Pain | Intractable Pain | Arm Pain
-
George Washington UniversityRecruitingCervical Fusion | Pain, Back | Pain, Neck | Myofacial PainUnited States
-
Universitat Jaume ICompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | OncologySpain
-
Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training...RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | VATSTurkey
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompletedPain, Radiating | Pain, Burning | Pain, Crushing | Pain, Migratory | Pain, SplittingUnited States, France, Spain, Poland, Portugal
-
University Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinZealand University Hospital; European Regional Development Fund; Design School...CompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Pain Measurement | Pain, CancerGermany
-
susanne beckerSNSFCompletedLow Back Pain | Pain, Acute | Pain, ChronicSwitzerland
-
University of Campinas, BrazilCompletedPREGNANCY | LUMBAR BACK PAIN | PELVIC PAIN
Clinical Trials on TAP Block
-
Ankara City Hospital BilkentCompletedPostoperative Pain, Acute | Analgesia, Patient-ControlledTurkey
-
University of PadovaRecruitingCesarean Delivery | Regional Anesthesia BlockItaly
-
Sahiwal medical college sahiwalCompletedBradycardia | Post Operative Analgesia | Opioid Sparing Anaesthesia | Hypotension, Controlled | Stoma Reversal ProcedurePakistan
-
TC Erciyes UniversityCompletedPainTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Esencan HospitalIstanbul Training and Research HospitalCompleted
-
Seoul National University HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Tianjin First Central HospitalRecruitingPostoperative Pain | Liposomal BupivacaineChina
-
Aga Khan UniversityCompletedSubcostal TAP Block for Multiport Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
-
Erzurum Regional Training & Research HospitalRecruitingPain Management | TAP Block | Mtapa BlockTurkey (Türkiye)