Effects of Physiotherapy in Hemodynamics and Childrens Respiratory Mechanics

December 19, 2012 updated by: Letícia de Queiroz Martins, Federal University of Uberlandia

Respiratory Mechanics and Hemodynamics in Children With Respiratory Failure: Comparison of Two Techniques of Respiratory Physiotherapy

The hypothesis of this study is that respiratory physiotherapy can promote improvement in respiratory mechanics in children with respiratory failure and the bag squeezing maneuver is more effective in improving respiratory mechanics in childrens and does not alter the hemodynamic proved safe

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 1 year (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • children aged between one and 60 months
  • diagnosed with respiratory failure
  • undergoing mechanical ventilation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • had traumatic brain injury
  • severe thrombocytopenia (<20,000 pl/mm³)
  • hypovolemia and cyanogenic congenital heart defects
  • pneumothorax, hemothorax and/or pleural effusion without previous drainage

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Bag Squeezing
  • 20% increase in FiO2
  • Inflation pressure of 30 cm H2O + 10l O2/min
  • 0.5 ml saline 0.9%
  • 10 Manual Hyperinflation
  • 10 vibrocompression
  • Aspiration Tracheal
To perform the TVC technique, we applied 10 vibrocompression maneuvers on the chest of the children during the expiratory phase of the respiratory cycle, on each of the lateral decubitus position, totaling 20 maneuvers, followed by aspiration in the dorsal decubitus position. All measurements in both study groups were performed with the child connected to the ventilator. Before starting the maneuver BS or TVC the child received an increase of 20% fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) from what was received previously in MV and after data collection FiO2 returned to baseline values.
Other Names:
  • TVC
Active Comparator: Thoracic vibrocompression
  • 20% increase in FiO2
  • 0.5 ml saline
  • 10 vibrocompression toracica on the right and left
  • Aspiration Tracheal
To perform the BS technique, we used a Protec® manual inflation bag with a flow of 10 L / min and 100% oxygen. A Commercial Medical® manometer was adapted between the orotracheal tube and the inflation bag to monitor the inflation pressure which was recommendedat 30 cmH2O for all children of the BS group. Initially we instilled at most 0.5 ml saline solution(SS) at 0.9% followed by 10 manual hyperinflation maneuvers interspersed with 10 vibrocompression maneuvers and as a last procedure, we performed an aspiration of the orotracheal tube airways and mouth. Between the aspirations the child was re-connected to the ventilator.
Other Names:
  • BS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effects of Bag Squeezing and vibrocompression chest in hemodynamic, resistance and respiratory system compliance
Time Frame: one hundred twenty minutes
All variables were assessed prior to the proposed technique (pre-maneuver), immediately after the execution of the technique randomly chosen (post-maneuver), 30, 60 and 120 after the end of the technique randomly chosen. The mean of three readings was used as the representative value for each variable. All children were ventilated with the same mechanical Dixtal® DX3020 Brazil ventilator
one hundred twenty minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
comparing all variables between the two groups
Time Frame: one hundred twenty minutes
one hundred twenty minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Letícia Martins, Federal University of Uberlândia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

December 12, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 21, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2012

Last Verified

November 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Insufficiency

Clinical Trials on Thoracic vibrocompression

Subscribe