Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation and Motor Training in Traumatic Brain Injury Survivors

April 30, 2017 updated by: Paolo Bonato, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

Combining Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation and Motor Training in Traumatic Brain Injury Survivors With Attentional Deficits

The overall goal of the proposed project is to perform a preliminary study to assess the potential effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) on the outcomes of a cognitive test of attention and the outcomes of robot-assisted upper-limb rehabilitation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

We plan to explore the use of GVS on the severity of attention span deficits and motor training delivered using a spring-based robot. We intend to carry out the study in a small cohort of traumatic brain injury (TBI) survivors (20 subjects). Subjects with attention span deficits but no significant motor impairments will solely undergo a cognitive test of attention with/without GVS. Subjects with both attention span deficits and significant motor impairments will undergo a cognitive test of attention and robot-assisted upper-limb rehabilitation with/without GVS.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

7

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02129
        • Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Moderate to severe traumatic brain injury involving cognitive and/or motor deficits.
  • Neurological injury >1 year prior to study enrollment
  • Significant attention deficit
  • For subjects with motor deficits (arms 2 and 3), sufficient voluntary movement and range of motion in the most-affected upper extremity to use the robotic arm system (Armeo Spring)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • History of seizures within 6 months of study enrollment
  • Major depression
  • Cognitive impairment that may interfere with understanding instructions
  • Severe limitations of upper extremity range of motion
  • Agitation
  • Other major neurological or psychiatric diseases
  • Participation in other forms of therapy/ intervention for upper extremity motor recovery
  • End-stage liver, kidney, cardiac or pulmonary disease
  • A terminal medical diagnosis with survival <1 year
  • History of drug or alcohol abuse in the last 3 years
  • Adjustment of, or plan to adjust, psychoactive medications within the preceding 1 month, or within the study period.
  • Current participation in another interventional trial targeting TBI
  • Previous GVS treatment
  • Contraindications to GVS such as implants

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Cognitive test with/without GVS
Subjects with attention span deficits and no significant motor impairments undergo solely a cognitive test. The test is carried out in multiple trials. For some of the trials (randomly selected), subjects receive galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS). For other trials, subjects received sham GVS. GVS is delivered using a device by A-M Systems.
A small current is delivered to the vestibular system via electrodes placed over the subject's mastoid processes.
Other Names:
  • Device: Model 2200 Analog Stimulus Isolator
  • Produce by: A-M Systems, Inc., WA, USA
Electrodes are placed over the subject's mastoid processes and connected to the device, but the device is not active.
Other Names:
  • Device: Model 2200 Analog Stimulus Isolator
  • Produce by: A-M Systems, Inc., WA, USA
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Armeo Spring +GVS
Subjects with both attention span deficits and significant motor impairments undergo robot-assisted upper-limb rehabilitation in combination with galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS). Robot-assisted training is carried out using the Armeo Spring system by Hocoma AG. GVS is delivered using a device by A-M Systems.
A small current is delivered to the vestibular system via electrodes placed over the subject's mastoid processes.
Other Names:
  • Device: Model 2200 Analog Stimulus Isolator
  • Produce by: A-M Systems, Inc., WA, USA
A robotic system supports the weak arm of the subject to make it easier to perform therapeutic exercises.
Other Names:
  • Device: Armeo Spring
  • Produced by: Hocoma
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Armeo Spring + sham GVS
Subjects with both attention span deficits and significant motor impairments undergo robot-assisted upper-limb rehabilitation in combination with sham GVS. Robot-assisted training is carried out using the Armeo Spring system by Hocoma AG. Sham stimulation is delivered by connecting the subject to a device by A-M Systems, but the device is not active.
Electrodes are placed over the subject's mastoid processes and connected to the device, but the device is not active.
Other Names:
  • Device: Model 2200 Analog Stimulus Isolator
  • Produce by: A-M Systems, Inc., WA, USA
A robotic system supports the weak arm of the subject to make it easier to perform therapeutic exercises.
Other Names:
  • Device: Armeo Spring
  • Produced by: Hocoma

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sustained Attention to Response Task
Time Frame: Baseline and end-of-treatment data (up to 2 weeks)
Subjects are presented with objects (one at the time) on a computer screen and are instructed to press a key on the keyboard according to the characteristics of the object shown on the computer screen. Error rates are measured as percentage of erroneous key selections.
Baseline and end-of-treatment data (up to 2 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 12, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 17, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 31, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on TBI

Clinical Trials on GVS

Subscribe