Effectiveness of Surgery for Atraumatic Shoulder Instability

April 24, 2023 updated by: Iva Hauptmannova, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust

Does Surgery Followed by Physiotherapy Improve Short and Long Term Outcomes for Patients With Atraumatic Shoulder Instability Compared With Physiotherapy Alone?

We will conduct a randomised clinical trial with the primary aim of determining whether surgical intervention followed by physiotherapy rehabilitation improves pain and disability outcomes more than physiotherapy rehabilitation alone in patients suffering from atraumatic shoulder instability associated with bony/capsulolabral damage. The results of this study will have direct and immediate impact on clinical decision making by establishing definitively if patients presenting with joint damage associated with atraumatic shoulder instability should be referred for surgery before commencing physiotherapy rehabilitation. The results of this study may also result in significant cost savings to the National Health Service if surgical intervention for atraumatic shoulder instability does not result in greater improvement than physiotherapy alone.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A two-arm, patient, physiotherapist and assessor-blinded, randomised controlled clinical trial will be conducted. 140 patients will be randomly allocated into one of 2 groups: a stabilisation surgery group and a control group. Primary outcomes (pain and disability) and secondary outcomes (participant-reported improvement and incidence of shoulder dislocations) will be evaluated at baseline and 6, 12 and 24 months after randomisation. Additional secondary outcomes of shoulder rotation range of motion and strength will be evaluated 6 months after randomisation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Middlesex
      • Stanmore, Middlesex, United Kingdom, HA7 4LP
        • Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • feelings of insecurity (apprehension) at their shoulder joint
  • provocation of apprehension with drawer and apprehension tests
  • evidence labral/capsular injury in the shoulder joint

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a history of a high collision shoulder injury precipitating apprehension symptoms
  • evidence of bony injury around glenoid rim/and or humeral head
  • a pristine joint i.e. no evidence of any structural injury to the joint, capsule or labrum.
  • a rotator cuff tear
  • neural damage affecting the upper limb
  • previous shoulder surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: physiotherapy alone
patients undergoing physiotherapy only
physiotherapy
arthroscopic stabilisation surgery
Other Names:
  • arthroscopic stabilisation surgery
Active Comparator: surgery and physiotherpay
patients receiving surgical treatment followed by physiotherapy
physiotherapy
arthroscopic stabilisation surgery
Other Names:
  • arthroscopic stabilisation surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in pain and functional impairment, measured using the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index.
Time Frame: over 24 months
Looking at time points of baseline, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
over 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Global perceived effect assessing participant-perceived improvement
Time Frame: over 24 months
over 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

December 18, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 12.024

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atraumatic Shoulder Instability

Clinical Trials on physiotherapy

3
Subscribe