The Role of Xerostomia in Burning Mouth Syndrome: Case - Control Study (BMS)

December 18, 2012 updated by: University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

Objectives: to evaluate xerostomia and salivary flow in patients with burning mouth syndrome (BMS) treated with amitriptyline before and after the use of antixerostomic topical medication.

Methods: In this case-control double-blinded study, we enrolled 38 patients with BMS diagnosed according to the (IASP). The subjects were randomly divided into two groups: Study Group: 19 patients whom received topical medication of urea 10% and Control Group: 19 patients whom received placebo to apply at the oral cavity 3-4 times per day, during three months. The patients were evaluated before and after the above treatment. Finally, data were statistically analyzed.

It is know that BMS is eventually associated to reduced salivary flow (Cho et al.,2010; Kho et al., 2010; Marino et al., 2010) and to abnormal salivary composition (increasing concentrations of K+, Na+, Cl-, Ca+2, IgA, amylase) (Patton et al., 2007). Even in the absence of hyposalivation, patients may complain of xerostomia and dry mouth (Cho et al.,2010; Kho et al., 2010; Marino et al., 2010; Thomson, 2005). These patients also have several sensory losses even in taste and smell function, recently described (Siqueira et al., 2006a; Siqueira et al., 2006b; Siviero et al., 2011).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Materials and Methods In this case-control double-blinded study, we enrolled 38 patients with BMS diagnosed according to the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) (17), that had been followed at the Craniofacial Pain Clinic of Hospital das Clinicas, School of Medicine of the University of Sao Paulo. All subjects were informed about the purposes of the study, and all signed the informed consent. The protocol had been approved by the local Ethics Committee. No patient had hyposalivation at the moment of diagnosis by the quantitative evaluation. All patients had been treated with 25mg-50mg of amitriptyline within the last three months. They underwent laboratory tests and careful exam to exclude other causes of burning mouth (10).

The exclusion criteria were other facial pain syndromes, other causes for abnormal salivation, other neuropathies or primary diseases associated to burning mouth, inability to answer the questions and / or tests

The subjects were randomly divided into two groups:

  1. Study Group: 19 patients received topical medication of urea 10% to be applied at the oral cavity 3-4 times per day, during three months.
  2. Control Group: 19 patients received placebo (5% sodium carboxymethylcellulose, 0.15% methyl paraben and 10% glycerol in distilled water qsp 100g) to be applied at the oral cavity 3-4 times per day, during three months.

The patients were evaluated before and after the above treatment with the following instruments:

  1. EDOF-HC protocol (Orofacial Pain Clinic - Hospital das Clinicas): a standardized orofacial pain questionnaire to detail: 1) chief complaint, 2) general pain characteristics (location, quality, duration, pain relief, pain triggering), 3) headache and/or body pain complaints, and 4) patient's medical history and co-morbidities (18,19);
  2. Xerostomia questionnaire (20);
  3. Quantitative sensory testing. All subjects underwent a standardized protocol of quantitative sensory testing (QST) (21) which consists of twelve tests grouped as follows:

    • salivary flow; gustative and olfactory thresholds;
    • thermal detection thresholds for cold and warm sensations;
    • mechanical detection thresholds for touch, vibration and electrical perception;
    • mechanical pain sensitivity including superficial and deep pain thresholds;
    • electric pain threshold at the teeth.
    • corneal reflex.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

38

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Sao Paulo, Brazil, 05403-010
        • Hospital das Clinicas, Medical Scholl, University of Sao Paulo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

37 years to 88 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients had been treated with 25mg-50mg of amitriptyline within the last three months. They underwent laboratory tests and careful exam to exclude other causes of burning mouth

Exclusion Criteria:

  • other facial pain syndromes, other causes for abnormal salivation, other neuropathies or primary diseases associated to burning mouth, inability to answer the questions and / or tests

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Study Group
19 patients whom received topical medication of urea 10%

The subjects were randomly divided into two groups:

1. Study Group: 19 patients received topical medication of urea 10% to be applied at the oral cavity 3-4 times per day, during three months.

Other Names:
  • ureia 10%
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Control Group
19 patients whom received placebo
Control Group: 19 patients received placebo (5% sodium carboxymethylcellulose, 0.15% methyl paraben and 10% glycerol in distilled water qsp 100g) to be applied at the oral cavity 3-4 times per day, during three months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The role of Xerostomia in Burning Mouth Syndrome: case - control study
Time Frame: three years
three years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Silvia RDT Siqueira, Professor, University of Sao Paulo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 13, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 21, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 21, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2012

Last Verified

December 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Burning Mouth Syndrome

3
Subscribe