- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01761084
Build Better Bones With Exercise (B3E)
November 12, 2019 updated by: University of Waterloo
Build Better Bones With Exercise: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Exercise in Women With Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture
The long-term goal of our research team is to conduct a large multicentre study to evaluate whether tailored home exercise can prevent fractures in high-risk individuals.
The proposed project will address the feasibility of such a trial, but will also evaluate the effect of exercise on quality of life, posture and many other outcomes important to individuals with vertebral fractures.
Physiotherapists will conduct 6 home visits with participants to deliver the intervention (or social visit for controls) using a similar model to previous work by our team and others.
The purpose of this pilot study is determining the feasibility of recruitment, retention and adherence of an international multicentre randomized controlled study evaluating the efficacy of thrice-weekly home exercise for one year among women with vertebral fracture.
As secondary objectives, the investigators will examine the effects of exercise on function, balance, quality of life, pain, falls and fractures.
The primary hypothesis is that the investigators will successfully recruit and retain the target sample, and achieve an adherence rate of 60%.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
There is limited data available from which to develop guidelines for safe and effective exercise prescription among individuals with hip or vertebral fractures.
The long-term goal of our research team is to conduct a large multi-centre randomized controlled trial (RCT) to investigate whether participating in a thrice-weekly home exercise program for one year can reduce incident fragility fractures among women aged 65 years or older with a history of vertebral fracture compared to no intervention.
The current study is a pilot study with the principal objective of determining the feasibility of recruitment, retention and adherence of an international multicentre RCT evaluating the efficacy of thrice-weekly home exercise for one year among women with vertebral fracture.
The intervention was developed by experts in exercise prescription based on a rigorous literature review and Cochrane meta-analysis we have conducted.
Physiotherapists will conduct 6 home visits with participants to deliver the intervention (or social visit for controls) using a similar model to previous work by our team and others.
Secondary outcomes of the pilot study are those hypothesized to be among the causal pathway linking exercise to fracture risk, including lower extremity strength, posture, balance, as well as falls and fractures.
Additional secondary outcomes include quality of life, pain, exercise self-efficacy, the cost of the intervention, and the risk of adverse events associated with exercise.
The recruitment and retention process will be summarized using a CONSORT flow diagram, and the reporting of results will be in accordance with the CONSORT criteria.
Analyses of feasibility objectives will be descriptive or based on estimates with 95% confidence intervals, where feasibility will be assessed relative to criteria defined a priori.
Differences in secondary outcomes will be evaluated in intention to treat analyses via independent student T-tests, Chi Square or logistic regression.
The Bonferroni method will be used to adjust the level of significance for secondary outcomes so the overall level is alpha=0.05.
Even if the larger trial proves not to be feasible, the current trial will be one of the largest exercise studies among a representative group of women with vertebral fracture to date, and will evaluate the feasibility and costs of a comprehensive home exercise program, and its effect on important secondary outcomes.
Osteoporosis Canada has defined a need to develop patient resources on exercise and recently announced a shift in priority to individuals with existing fractures; the proposed pilot study is timely and will directly inform these knowledge translation initiatives.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
141
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2L 3G1
- University of Waterloo
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
65 years and older (Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Has a) a known or suspected vertebral fracture of non-traumatic etiology OR b) one of the following:
- documented height loss of ≥2cm
- historical height loss of ≥6cm
- visible hyperkyphosis
- age greater than or equal to 65 years of age
- able to understand instructions in english
- able to give informed consent (no cognitive impairment)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Current or prior cancer
- On dialysis, known liver, kidney or malabsorption disease
- Progressive neurological disorder, unable to stand or walk for 10 metres, with/without gait aid or progressive disorder likely to prevent study completion, palliative care.
- Current participation in muscle strengthening or similar exercise program ≥ 3 times per week
- Uncontrolled hypertension or other contraindications to exercise
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Exercise and behaviour change strategies
The exercise program will include strength training, balance training and cardiovascular exercise that is individually tailored to the participants' abilities.
The physical therapist will also implement strategies to assist with behaviour change, such as documenting progress in a log, participating in action planning and coping planning, and using techniques in the spirit of motivational interviewing.
|
|
|
No Intervention: General health or social discussion
Participants in the control group will receive equal attention, but will not be prescribed exercise, or participate in counselling about exercise.
The physical therapist will discuss topics related to general health.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility of Recruitment and Retention
Time Frame: Monthly records up to 12 months.
|
Number of participants recruited and retained.
Criteria for success = 20 recruited per site and at least 75% retained.
|
Monthly records up to 12 months.
|
|
Adherence
Time Frame: Monthly records over 12 months
|
Number of exercise sessions completed relative to prescribed.
We will use a diary for participants to self-report adherence.
|
Monthly records over 12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Fractures.
Time Frame: Baseline, one year and at report of fracture (monitored monthly for reports).
|
Incident fracture will be a composite outcome of a vertebral fracture or fragility fracture (excluding fractures due to trauma or cancer).
A fracture questionnaire will be used to ascertain the occurrence of fractures, the approximate timing and the cause with fracture occurrence, location and severity verified through health record data.
Lateral thoracic and lumbar spine x-rays will be performed on participants at baseline (to confirm prevalent vertebral fractures) and follow-up (to identify new fractures).
Vertebral fractures will be defined as radiographic presence of ≥25% reduction in anterior, middle or posterior height of a vertebra using the Genant visual semi-quantitative method.
|
Baseline, one year and at report of fracture (monitored monthly for reports).
|
|
Number of Fallers
Time Frame: Monthly up to one year.
|
Diary for participants to self-report falls.
|
Monthly up to one year.
|
|
Occiput to Wall Distance
Time Frame: Baseline and one year.
|
Baseline and one year.
|
|
|
Scores on the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Time Frame: Baseline and one year.
|
The SPPB consists of balance tests (side-by-side, semi-tandem, and tandem standing), gait speed during 4-meter walk test, and the average time taken to rise from a chair with arms folded across chest and sit back down (Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand test), sub-scores of which are added to determine a composite score (0-12), with higher scores indicative of better performance.
|
Baseline and one year.
|
|
Scores on Balance Outcome Measure for Elder Rehabilitation (BOOMER).
Time Frame: Baseline and one year.
|
Balance Outcome Measure for Elder Rehabilitation (BOOMER) includes the step test, the Timed Up and Go, the Functional Reach test and the timed static stance feet together eyes closed test.
The sub-scores of which are added to create a composite score (0-16), with higher scores indicating better performance.
|
Baseline and one year.
|
|
Quality of Life (QoL) and Pain Scores Measured Through the EuroQOL Instrument (EQ5D5L) and the Osteoporosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ) and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and one year.
|
OQLQ scores range 1-7, with higher scores indicate greater quality of life.
EQ5D5L VAS scores range 0-100, with higher scores indicating better overall health.
VAS pain scores range 0-10, with lower scores indicating less pain.
|
Baseline, 6 months and one year.
|
|
Scores on Exercise Self-efficacy Scales.
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and one year.
|
To assess self-efficacy related to engaging in exercise, participants will be asked "Over the next 3 months, how confident are you that you can perform exercise on most days of the week?" and "Over the next 3 months, how confident are you that you can perform exercise on 3 days of the week?."
To assess implementation intentions, participants are asked "Do you already have concrete plans regarding exercise?".
Patients will rate their answers on a scale from 1-5.
Higher scores indicate greater exercise self-efficacy.
|
Baseline, 6 months and one year.
|
|
Score on Short-form Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I).
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and one year.
|
Questionnaire about how concerned the participant is about the possibility of falling during common daily activities.
Scores range from 7 (no concern about falling) to 28 (severe concern about falling.
|
Baseline, 6 months and one year.
|
|
Productivity
Time Frame: Monthly up to one year.
|
Questionnaire regarding much did the participant's spine fracture(s) or osteoporosis affect their productivity while working?
The scale is 0-10, with higher numbers indicating more effect on their work.
|
Monthly up to one year.
|
|
Physical Activity
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
|
A modified version of the Short-Form International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) will be completed.
A subset of participants at the University of Waterloo (St.
Mary's General Hospital) will wear an accelerometer for 7 days.
|
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
|
|
Number of Serious Adverse Events.
Time Frame: Monthly up to one year.
|
Defined as death or event that is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or results in disability.
|
Monthly up to one year.
|
|
Number of Individuals Screened and Eligible Per Collection Site.
Time Frame: over the course of the study (2.29 years)
|
Number of participants randomized out of all participants screened
|
over the course of the study (2.29 years)
|
|
Number of Potentially Eligible Males
Time Frame: over recruitment period
|
over recruitment period
|
|
|
Number of Participants With Multiple Falls
Time Frame: Monthly up to 12 months.
|
Monthly up to 12 months.
|
|
|
Total Number of Falls
Time Frame: Monthly up to 12 months.
|
Monthly up to 12 months.
|
|
|
Value of Direct Medical Resources Per Participant.
Time Frame: Accrued costs over 12 months
|
Accrued costs over 12 months
|
|
|
Value of Non-direct Medical Resources Per Participant.
Time Frame: Accrued costs over 12 months
|
Accrued costs over 12 months
|
|
|
Participant Height
Time Frame: Baseline and one year
|
Baseline and one year
|
|
|
Activities of Daily Living
Time Frame: Monthly up to one year
|
0-10 scale about ability to do activities of daily living.
Higher scores indicate more difficulty.
|
Monthly up to one year
|
|
Timed Loaded Standing Test
Time Frame: Baseline and one year
|
A physical performance measure of combined trunk and arm endurance.
|
Baseline and one year
|
|
Location of Vertebral Fractures
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
|
Any vertebral fracture (Genant Grade 1 or higher) found on x-ray, divided into location groupings of T1-T3, T4-T8, T9-L1, and L2-L5.
|
Baseline and Month 12
|
|
Participant Weight
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
|
Baseline and Month 12
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Gibbs JC, McArthur C, Wark JD, Thabane L, Scherer SC, Prasad S, Papaioannou A, Mittmann N, Laprade J, Kim S, Khan A, Kendler DL, Hill KD, Cheung AM, Bleakney R, Ashe MC, Adachi JD, Giangregorio LM. The Effects of Home Exercise in Older Women With Vertebral Fractures: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Phys Ther. 2020 Apr 17;100(4):662-676. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzz188.
- Giangregorio LM, Thabane L, Adachi JD, Ashe MC, Bleakney RR, Braun EA, Cheung AM, Fraser LA, Gibbs JC, Hill KD, Hodsman AB, Kendler DL, Mittmann N, Prasad S, Scherer SC, Wark JD, Papaioannou A. Build better bones with exercise: protocol for a feasibility study of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 12 months of home exercise in women with a vertebral fracture. Phys Ther. 2014 Sep;94(9):1337-52. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130625. Epub 2014 May 1.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2016
Study Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2016
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 2, 2013
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 3, 2013
First Posted (Estimate)
January 4, 2013
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
November 14, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 12, 2019
Last Verified
March 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 18539
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Spinal Fractures
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceCompletedWounds and Injuries | Spinal Injuries | Spinal FractureFrance
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
National Cheng-Kung University HospitalCompletedSpinal Fractures
-
Medical University of GrazNot yet recruiting
-
Alphatec Spine, Inc.TerminatedVertebral Compression FracturesUnited States
-
Assiut UniversityUnknown
-
TeknimedRecruitingVertebral Fracture | Osteoporotic Fractures | Compression FractureSpain, France, Ukraine, Portugal
-
Jinan Military General HospitalChina Medical University, China; Beijing Friendship Hospital; Shanghai 10th People... and other collaboratorsUnknownAcute Osteoporotic Spinal FracturesChina
-
Sohag UniversityNot yet recruitingComparative Study Between ESPB Versus IV Morphine as Postoperative Analgesia After Spine Surgeries .Vertebral Fractures | DiscectomyEgypt
-
Korean Medicine Hospital of Pusan National UniversityTerminatedFractures, Bone | Spinal Fracture | Compression FractureKorea, Republic of
Clinical Trials on Exercise and behaviour change strategies
-
Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de...Active, not recruitingWeight Management | Lifestyle, Healthy | Behavior ChangeSpain
-
Western Sussex Hospitals NHS TrustUniversity of BrightonCompletedShoulder Impingement SyndromeUnited Kingdom
-
Unidade Local de Saúde de Matosinhos, EPERecruitingChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease | Pulmonary RehabilitationPortugal
-
Liverpool John Moores UniversityUniversity of Liverpool; Dublin City UniversityUnknownExerciseIreland, United Kingdom
-
Northumbria UniversityHealthWorks Newcastle Upon TyneRecruitingHypertension (HTN)United Kingdom
-
University of MinnesotaNational Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)CompletedPhysical Activity | Exercise | Older Adults | Motivation | Accidental FallUnited States
-
University of SouthamptonUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustNot yet recruiting
-
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustCompletedCystic FibrosisUnited Kingdom
-
University of British ColumbiaUniversity of Sao PauloNot yet recruiting
-
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustCompletedCystic FibrosisUnited Kingdom