Parkinson's Disease Biomarker Program (PDBP)

Longitudinal, Single-center Prospective Study to Assess Progression of Clinical Features and Biologic Markers of Parkinson's Disease Subjects of Varying Levels of Disease Severity

The primary objective of this study is to obtain detailed clinical information and biologic specimens from subjects with PD toward the ultimate end of identifying a biomarker of PD. Because of the inherent difficulties of using clinical outcome measures to assess disease modification, the identification of biomarkers of PD is of paramount importance. The ideal PD biomarker would be one that is easily assayed in a convenient biological sample, varies proportionally with disease severity, is abnormal during the pre-symptomatic phase of the illness, and is unaffected by drugs or other interventions used to treat PD. The existence of a sensitive biomarker with these properties would enable much more effective disease modifying research that would likely be able to take advantage of smaller and potentially shorter trials.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Subjects will be asked to attend study visits every 6 months for up to 5 years of follow up. Each visit will consist of patient outcomes questionnaires, neurological exams, computerized assessments of gait and balance, a video recorded motor exam, and biological specimen collection for biomarker discovery.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

238

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
        • UT Southwestern Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

(1) de-novo, previously untreated patients within 5 years of symptom onset, n=20, and (2) patients on treatment with and clinically responsive to MAO-B inhibitors, dopamine agonists, amantadine, or levodopa (or combinations), n=220 and (3) healthy control patients without evidence of degenerative nerological disease.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A diagnosis of idiopathic PD meeting UK PD Society Brain Bank Criteria (Step 1, Step 2, and 2 items present from step 3).1
  • Male or female age 30 years or older at time of PD diagnosis, Hoehn & Yahr (H&Y) stage I-IV.
  • Confirmation from I-123 Ioflupane SPECT (DatScan®) of dopamine transporter deficit for de-novo, untreated patients.
  • Clinical evidence of response to dopaminergic medication (MAO-B inhibitors, dopamine agonists, levodopa, or combinations) in patients on treatment for PD.
  • Ability to provide written informed consent in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP), International Conference on Harmonization (ICH), and local regulations.
  • Able to make visits to UT Southwestern every 6 months for up to 5 years without undue hardship.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Idiopathic PD, H&Y stage 5, as these will be unable to participate in gait assessments.
  • Confirmed or suspected atypical parkinsonian syndromes due to drugs, metabolic disorders, encephalitis, or degenerative diseases.
  • Presence of definite dementia (MoCA < 17)2.
  • For de-novo subjects: received any of the following drugs that might interfere with dopamine transporter SPECT imaging: neuroleptics, metoclopramide, alpha methyldopa, methylphenidate, reserpine, or amphetamine derivative, within 6 months of screening.
  • For the prospective CSF cohort: current treatment with anticoagulants (e.g., coumadin, heparin) that might preclude safe completion of the lumbar puncture.
  • For the prospective CSF cohort: any condition that precludes the safe performance of routine lumbar puncture, such as prohibitive lumbar spinal disease, bleeding diathesis, or known clinically significant coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia.
  • Any other medical or psychiatric condition or lab abnormality, which in the opinion of the investigator might preclude participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Previously treated PD patients
220 subjects with PD treated and responsive to dopaminergic medication
Previously untreated PD
20 subjects with de-novo, previously untreated PD confirmed by I-123 Ioflupane SPECT
Healthy age-matched controls
46 age-matched healthy controls will be studied.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To estimate the mean rates of change and the variability around the mean of clinical outcomes in PD patients over 3-5 years of follow-up comparing these rates between PD patients of each stage of the Hoehn and Yahr.
Time Frame: 5 years
This analysis will evaluate rates of progression in PD subjects and determine predictors of fast vs. slow progression
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To determine the predictive value of iTUG/iSWAY test results on future course of the disease
Time Frame: 5 years
This analysis aims to determine if automated gait or balance parameters can classify PD subjects as fast vs slow progressors, and whether gait or balance parameters can track disease progression
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Richard Dewey, MD, UT Southwestern Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

January 14, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson's Disease

3
Subscribe