Ext. Long-term Safety Study in CF Patients: Single Arm TIP

November 5, 2015 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

A 48 Week Extension to CTBM100C2401, a Single Arm, Open-label, Multicenter, Phase IV Extension Trial to Assess Long Term Safety of Tobramycin Inhalation Powder (TIP) in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis Who Completed Participation in CTBM100C2401.

The purpose of this extension study is to collect additional 48 weeks of safety data from patients taking TIP who have completed the core study CTBM100C2401. The purpose of collecting second year safety data through this study is to obtain long-term (2 years) safety data of TIP.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Buenos Aires
      • Caba, Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1425DTG
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1425EFD
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Cordoba
      • Córdoba, Cordoba, Argentina, X5014AKN
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • New South Wales
      • New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia, 2305
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Victoria
      • Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3052
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3T1C5
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Essen, Germany, 45147
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1121
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Palermo, Italy, 90100
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Roma, Italy, 00161
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • FI
      • Firenze, FI, Italy, 50139
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • ME
      • Messina, ME, Italy, 98125
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • VR
      • Verona, VR, Italy, 37126
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Distrito Federal
      • Mexico, Distrito Federal, Mexico, 06720
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Nuevo León
      • Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico, 64020
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Catalunya
      • Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain, 08035
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Comunidad Valenciana
      • Valencia, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain, 46026
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Ohio
      • Akron, Ohio, United States, 44308
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75230
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Novartis Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Completion of the core study CTBM100C2401 and able to comply with all protocol requirements of the extension study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serum creatinine 2mg/dl, BUN 40mg/dl or proteinuria 2+ or more at the time of entry into the extension
  • Use of loop diuretics within 7 days prior to entry into the extension study
  • Pregnant or nursing women
  • Women of child bearing potential unless using highly effective method of contraception as indicated in the protoco

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: TBM100
TIP 112 mg/b.i.d
Tobramycin inhalation powder (TIP) 112mg/b.i.d

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs/SAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug and Deaths Over 12 Treatment Cycles
Time Frame: Baseline (start of study treatment in core study) to Day 673 (end of the extension study)
An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not related to study drug. A SAE was defined as an event which was fatal or life threatening, required or prolonged hospitalization, was significantly or permanently disabling or incapacitating, constituted a congenital anomaly or a birth defect, or encompassed any other clinically significant event that could jeopardize the participant or require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the aforementioned outcomes. Based on the severity, AEs were categorised into 3 types as mild, moderate and severe. Death was a fatal event leading to permanent cessations of all vital functions of the body.
Baseline (start of study treatment in core study) to Day 673 (end of the extension study)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relative Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Percent Predicted Over 12 Treatment Cycles
Time Frame: Baseline (start of study treatment in core study), Day 29, Day 85, Day 141, Day 197, Day 253, Day 309, Day 337, Day 365, Day 421, Day 477, Day 533, Day 589, Day 645, 673 (end of the extension study)
FEV1 was defined as the volume of air expired in 1 second. FEV1 was assessed as a pulmonary function by using spirometry tests in accordance with American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) criteria. FEV1% predicted is a normalized value of FEV1 calculated using the Knudsen equation, based upon participant's age, gender and height. Relative change in FEV1 % predicted from baseline to pre-dose day X = ((pre-dose day*FEV1% predicted - baseline FEV1% predicted) / baseline FEV1 % predicted) x 100.
Baseline (start of study treatment in core study), Day 29, Day 85, Day 141, Day 197, Day 253, Day 309, Day 337, Day 365, Day 421, Day 477, Day 533, Day 589, Day 645, 673 (end of the extension study)
Absolute Change From Baseline in Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Sputum Density Over 12 Treatment Cycles
Time Frame: Baseline (start of study treatment in core study), Day 29, Day 85, Day 141, Day 197, Day 253, Day 309, Day 337, Day
Microbiological data was collected to understand the direct impact of the drug on the pathogens. Sputum samples were cultured for the presence of three Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) biotypes measured were mucoid, dry and small colony variant. Absolute change was determined using the formula = (Post-baseline value- baseline value). If no P. aeruginosa was isolated for a visit, log10 colony forming units (CFU) was imputed with log10 (19) for all biotypes.
Baseline (start of study treatment in core study), Day 29, Day 85, Day 141, Day 197, Day 253, Day 309, Day 337, Day
Tobramycin Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) 50 and MIC 90 Values for Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Over 12 Treatment Cycles
Time Frame: Baseline (start of study treatment in core study), Day 29, Day 85, Day 141, Day 197, Day 253, Day 309, Day 337, Day 365, Day 421, Day 477, Day 533, Day 589, Day 645, 673 (end of the extension study)
MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial agent required to inhibit the visible growth of a microorganism after overnight incubation. Tobramycin MIC 50 and MIC 90 values were defined as the lowest concentration of tobramycin required to inhibit 50% and 90%, respectively, of the P. aeruginosa strains tested (mucoid,dry and small colony variant biotypes).
Baseline (start of study treatment in core study), Day 29, Day 85, Day 141, Day 197, Day 253, Day 309, Day 337, Day 365, Day 421, Day 477, Day 533, Day 589, Day 645, 673 (end of the extension study)
Percentage of Participants Who Used New Anti-pseudomonal Antibiotics Over 12 Treatment Cycles
Time Frame: Baseline of core study, Day 673 (end of the extension study)
The rate of anti-pseudomonal antibiotics use were determined from the collection of concomitant medication during the study.
Baseline of core study, Day 673 (end of the extension study)
Total Number of Days of New Anti-pseudomonal Antibiotics Use Over 12 Treatment Cycles
Time Frame: Baseline of core study, Day 673 (end of the extension study)
The total number of days with usage of new anti-pseudomonal antibiotic were determined.
Baseline of core study, Day 673 (end of the extension study)
Time to Use of New Anti-pseudomonal Antibiotics Over 12 Treatment Cycles
Time Frame: Baseline of core study, Day 673 (end of the extension study)
Time to first usage of anti-pseudomonal antibiotic was determined using Kaplan Meier estimate. Participants without an event were censored at the date of the last available post-baseline measurement.
Baseline of core study, Day 673 (end of the extension study)
The Percentage of the Participants Hospitalized Due to Serious Respiratory-related AEs Were Determined During the Study.
Time Frame: Baseline of core study, Day 673 (end of the extension study)
The percentage of the participants hospitalized due to serious respiratory-related AEs were determined during the study.
Baseline of core study, Day 673 (end of the extension study)
Number of Hospitalization Days Due to Respiratory Related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Over 12 Treatment Cycles
Time Frame: Baseline of core study, Day 673 (end of the extension study)
The total number of hospitalization days due to serious respiratory-related adverse events was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimate.
Baseline of core study, Day 673 (end of the extension study)
Time to First Hospitalization Due to Respiratory Related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Over 12 Treatment Cycles
Time Frame: Baseline of core study, Day 673 (end of the extension study)
The day of first hospitalization due to serious respiratory-related adverse events was analysed using Kaplan Meier estimate.
Baseline of core study, Day 673 (end of the extension study)
Acute Relative Change From Pre-dose to 30-minute Post-dose in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Percent Predicted Over 12 Treatment Cycles
Time Frame: Baseline (start of study treatment in core study), Day 29, Day 85, Day 141, Day 197, Day 253, Day 309, Day 337, Day 365, Day 421, Day 477, Day 533, Day 589, Day 645, 673 (end of the extension study)
FEV1 was defined as the volume of air expired in 1 second. FEV1 was assessed as a pulmonary function by using spirometry tests in accordance with American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) criteria. Relative change in FEV1 % predicted was calculated by using the formula = 100 *(30-min post-dose value - pre-dose value) / pre-dose value.
Baseline (start of study treatment in core study), Day 29, Day 85, Day 141, Day 197, Day 253, Day 309, Day 337, Day 365, Day 421, Day 477, Day 533, Day 589, Day 645, 673 (end of the extension study)
Relative Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Percent Predicted Over 6 Treatment Cycles in Extension Study
Time Frame: Baseline (start of study treatment in extension study), Day 365, Day 421, Day 477, Day 533, Day 589, Day 645, 673 (end of the extension study)
FEV1 was defined as the volume of air expired in 1 second. FEV1 was assessed as a pulmonary function by using spirometry tests in accordance with American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) criteria. FEV1% predicted is a normalized value of FEV1 calculated using the Knudsen equation, based upon participant's age, gender and height. Relative change in FEV1 % predicted from baseline to pre-dose day X = ((pre-dose day*FEV1% predicted - baseline FEV1% predicted) / baseline FEV1 % predicted) x 100.
Baseline (start of study treatment in extension study), Day 365, Day 421, Day 477, Day 533, Day 589, Day 645, 673 (end of the extension study)
Absolute Change From Baseline in Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Density Over 6 Treatment Cycles in Extension Study
Time Frame: Baseline (start of study treatment in extension study), Day 365, Day 421, Day 477, Day 533, Day 589, Day 645, 673 (end of the extension study)
Microbiological data was collected to understand the direct impact of the drug on the pathogens. Sputum samples were cultured for the presence of three Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) biotypes measured were mucoid, dry and small colony variant. If no P. aeruginosa was isolated for a visit, log10 colony forming units (CFU) was imputed with log10 (19) for all biotypes. Absolute change was calculated by using the formula = (Value at actual time point - start of extension value).
Baseline (start of study treatment in extension study), Day 365, Day 421, Day 477, Day 533, Day 589, Day 645, 673 (end of the extension study)
Percentage of Participants Who Used New Anti-pseudomonal Antibiotics in Extension Study
Time Frame: Baseline of extension study, Day 673 (end of extension study)
The rate of anti-pseudomonal antibiotics use were determined from the collection of concomitant medication during the study.
Baseline of extension study, Day 673 (end of extension study)
Total Number of Days of New Anti-pseudomonal Antibiotics Use in Extension Study
Time Frame: Baseline of extension study, Day 673 (end of extension study)
The total number of days with usage of new anti-pseudomonal antibiotic were determined.
Baseline of extension study, Day 673 (end of extension study)
Time to Use of New Anti-pseudomonal Antibiotics in Extension Study
Time Frame: Baseline of extension study, Day 673 (end of extension study)
Time to first usage of anti-pseudomonal antibiotic was determined using Kaplan Meier estimate. Participants without an event were censored at the date of the last available post-baseline measurement.
Baseline of extension study, Day 673 (end of extension study)
Percentage of Participants Hospitalized Due to Respiratory Related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Extension Study
Time Frame: Baseline of extension study, Day 673 (end of the extension study)
The percentage of the participants hospitalized due to serious respiratory-related AEs were determined during the extension study.
Baseline of extension study, Day 673 (end of the extension study)
Number of Hospitalization Days Due to Respiratory Related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Extension Study
Time Frame: Baseline of extension study, Day 673 (end of extension study)
The total number of hospitalisation days due to serious respiratory-related adverse events was analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimate.
Baseline of extension study, Day 673 (end of extension study)
Time to First Hospitalization Due to Respiratory Related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Extension Study
Time Frame: Baseline of extension study, Day 673 (end of extension study)
The day of first hospitalization due to serious respiratory related adverse events was analysed using Kaplan Meier estimate.
Baseline of extension study, Day 673 (end of extension study)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs/SAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug and Deaths Over 6 Treatment Cycles in Extension Study
Time Frame: Baseline (start of study treatment in extension study) to Day 673 (end of the extension study)
An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not related to study drug. A SAE was defined as an event which was fatal or life threatening, required or prolonged hospitalisation, was significantly or permanently disabling or incapacitating, constituted a congenital anomaly or a birth defect, or encompassed any other clinically significant event that could jeopardize the participant or require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the aforementioned outcomes. Death was a fatal event leading to permanent cessations of all vital functions of the body.
Baseline (start of study treatment in extension study) to Day 673 (end of the extension study)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 22, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 24, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 6, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2015

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CTBM100C2401E1

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Long-term Safety of TIP

Clinical Trials on TBM100

Subscribe