Impact of Incision Size and Architecture on Wound Stability and Astigmatism in Cataract Surgery: an Exploratory Study (INCISIONS)

February 7, 2014 updated by: Prim. Prof. Dr. Oliver Findl, MBA, Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery

One of the most recent advances in cataract surgery is microincisional phacoemulsification (MICS). Through small incisions of 2.0 mm and less the lens material is emulsified either bimanually or with a thin single coaxial hand-piece. The possible advantages are lower induced corneal astigmatism1, 2, possibly a lower incidence of infection due to higher resistance of the wound to deformation3 and a lower risk of complications such as iris prolapse during surgery in patients at risk such as with intraoperative floppy iris syndrome (IFIS). Additional factors that have to be taken into account are the construction and the position of the incision and the influence of the extraocular force on the wound morphology.4 Another effect that may influence the wound architecture is stromal hydration at the end of surgery.5 Wound architecture has recently been assessed6-9 using optical coherence tomography. Elkady et al.10 observed the wound architecture in MICS cases focusing on corneal thickness and the incision angle. However, none of these studies observed the effect of the wound architecture on post-operative astigmatism. Furthermore, all observations in the past have been performed in the post-operative period only and information concerning the wound architecture intra-operatively is missing. A recently launched CE-marked intra-operative OCT allows observing the wound architecture intra-operatively.

One aim of the study is to assess the influence of the intra-operative wound architecture using a similar grading system as used by Calladine and Packard (2007)7 on the resistance to deformation of the wound and the surgically induced astigmatism in MICS and small incision cataract surgery (SICS). In a second part of this exploratory study the effect of a hinged incision with a pre-cut should be assessed along the same line

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

68

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vienna, Austria, 1140
        • VIROS - Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgers - Departement of Opthalmology - Hanusch Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age-related cataract
  • Age 21 and older
  • written informed consent prior to recruitment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy (pregnancy test will be taken pre-operatively in women of reproductive age)
  • Any ophthalmic abnormality that could compromise the measurements

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: MICS-group
Micro incision cataract surgery is done
Active Comparator: SICS-group
small incision cataract surgery is done
Active Comparator: SICS pre-cut
Small incision cataract surgery with pre-cut is done
Active Comparator: SICS stab-incision
Small incision cataract surgery with stab-incision is done

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
o Correlation between a wound architecture score (developed during the study) and the post-operative astigmatism for the "MICS", the "SICS", the "SICS pre-cut" and the "SICS stab-incision" group
Time Frame: pre-operatively to one day post-operativly
pre-operatively to one day post-operativly

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Oliver Findl, MD, MBA, VIROS - Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

January 29, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 10, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2014

Last Verified

February 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • INCISIONS

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cataract

Clinical Trials on MICS-group

Subscribe