Peristeen Bowel Irrigation System in Cauda Equina

July 4, 2016 updated by: Dr. Karen Ethans, University of Manitoba

The Use of the Peristeen Bowel Irrigation System for People With Cauda Equina Syndrome

To compare the Peristeen Anal Irrigation System with conservative bowel management in a prospective study among spinal cord injured patients with lower motor neuron neurogenic bowel dysfunction.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

People with spinal cord injury (SCI) often have severe problems with management of bowel function, including incontinence, impaction, lengthy bowel routines and extremely slow transit times.The anal irrigation system is a recently available system to help patients with bowel dysfunction empty their bowels by using pulse water irrigation. The system consists of a rectal balloon catheter, manual pump and water container.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Manitoba
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3A 1M4
        • WRHA Health Sciences Centre Rehabilitation Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female >18 years or older
  • Cauda equina spinal injury at least 12 months previously, with lower motor neuron bowel dysfunction and at least one of the following symptoms:
  • Spending 30 minutes or more attempting to defecate each day or every second day
  • Episodes of fecal incontinence once or more per month
  • Abdominal discomfort before or during defecation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Coexisting major unresolved physical problems due to the injury
  • Performance of transanal irrigation on a regular basis
  • Evidence of bowel obstruction or active inflammatory bowel disease
  • History of cerebral palsy, stroke, multiple sclerosis or diabetic polyneuropathy
  • Previous colorectal or perineal surgery(excluding minor surgery such as hemorrhoidectomy)
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Immunosuppression
  • Prior implant for sacral nerve stimulation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Use of a bowel irrigation system
Open label. No placebo use in this study. All volunteers will trial the bowel irrigation system. Eligible volunteers will be those patients who have failed conventional supportive bowel care.
A complete system for bowel Irrigation to manage bowel dysfunction

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline on Cleveland Clinic Constipation Scoring System after 10 weeks of treatment
Time Frame: At baseline Visit and again after 10 weeks of treatment
A scoring system with a range of 0-30, with 30 representing the most severe symptoms. Will be used for volunteers whose primary complaint at baseline is constipation.
At baseline Visit and again after 10 weeks of treatment
Change from baseline on the St. Mark's Fecal Incontinence Grading System after 10 weeks of treatment.
Time Frame: At baseline and again after 10 weeks of treatment
A Grading system with a range of 0-24, with 24 representing the most severe symptoms. This will be used for volunteers whose primary complaint at baseline is fecal incontinence.
At baseline and again after 10 weeks of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in The Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score after 10 weeks of treatment
Time Frame: At baseline and again after 10 weeks of treatment
A symptom score ranging from 0-47, where each symptom of neurogenic bowel is weighted concerning it's impact on quality of life. A score of 47 represents severe symptoms.
At baseline and again after 10 weeks of treatment
Change from baseline in a modified American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons fecal incontinence score after 10 weeks of treatment.
Time Frame: At baseline and again after 10 weeks of treatment
Symptom-related Quality of Life Score
At baseline and again after 10 weeks of treatment
Change from baseline measurement of Colonic Transit Time (CTT)after 10 weeks of treatment
Time Frame: At baseline and again after 10 weeks of treatment.
The Metcalf method will be used.At the screening visit,eligible volunteers will be given a 7-day bowel diary and 3 SitzMark capsules with instructions on how to complete the diary and when to take the capsules. Abdominal X-rays will be obtained on Day 4 and 7. The patient will repeat the diary, SitzMark capsules and X-rays during the last week of study treatment.
At baseline and again after 10 weeks of treatment.
Change from baseline on a numeric box scale to measure bowel function, influence on daily activities, and general satisfaction after 10 weeks of treatment.
Time Frame: At baseline and after 10 weeks of treatment.
Numeric box scales with a range of 1-10
At baseline and after 10 weeks of treatment.
Measurement of Influence of Current Bowel Management on Quality of Life
Time Frame: After 10 weeks of treatment
A numeric box scale with a range of 0-10, with 0 representing great reduction and 10 representing great improvement.
After 10 weeks of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 30, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

February 5, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 6, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 4, 2016

Last Verified

July 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cauda Equina Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Peristeen Bowel Irrigation System

Subscribe