BLB Study Back or Leg Pain and Bladder Symptoms Study (BLB)

April 6, 2020 updated by: University of Edinburgh

The research focuses on Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) which describes damage to the nerves in the lower back which supply bladder, bowels, sexual function and the legs usually from slipped discs in the spine.

CES is as common as multiple sclerosis and is diagnosed using an MRI scan of the spine, 'scan positive' CES. However, about 50% of people presenting with the symptoms of CES have MRI scans which do not explain their symptoms, 'scan negative' patients. The BLB study will be the first large clinical study comparing patients with 'scan positive' and 'scan negative' CES. All patients admitted to the Western General Hospital, Edinburgh with possible CES will be invited to participate. The study consists of detailed history taking, examination and a questionnaire following up patient's symptoms at three months.

The study aims to see what differences exist between the 'scan positive' and 'scan negative' groups, help doctors understand more about the outcomes of both groups and discover the number of patients with 'scan negative' CES who have functional disorders (previously called medically unexplained or conversion disorders) or undiagnosed neurological disorders.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Uro-neurological disorders are those in which there is a disturbance of bladder function related to a neurological cause. However, many patients with Uro-Neurological disorders are not found to have explanatory abnormalities despite adequate clinical and radiological investigation, so-called 'scan negative' patients. The BLB study will investigate this problem through an acute disorder, Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES), to provide a better understanding of scan-negative Uro-Neurological disorders.

CES is a devastating condition caused by compression of the cauda equina nerve roots resulting in bowel, bladder and sexual dysfunction with potential lower limb weakness. CES requires urgent surgery and has serious potential morbidity and medico-legal consequences1. Suspected acute CES has a minimum incidence of 11 per 100,000 making it twice as common as multiple sclerosis. However, in the two largest studies both retrospective and from Edinburgh, 43-48% of patients with clinical CES were 'scan-negative' and indeed received no other diagnosis 1,2.

Little is known about patients with 'scan negative' CES and nothing is known about their outcome. Our two studies in Edinburgh found basic clinical and demographic characteristics could not distinguish 'scan positive' and 'scan negative' groups 1,2. However, on the basis of clinical experience, and now prospective pilot data, the investigators hypothesise that many of these patients have either an acute functional disorder or, in some cases, sacral nerve damage not seen on imaging but detectable on anal sphincter EMG. Functional disorders, also called psychogenic/non-organic disorders, refer to genuinely experienced physical symptoms which can be positively identified as not related to underlying neurological disease3. Finding out about the diagnosis of patients with 'scan negative' CES would enable them to access treatment and improve their outcome as well as creating better service provision for them in the long term. There is also limited data on long term outcome in patients with 'scan positive' CES and a wish for knowledge from the medical community about what the priorities for patients with 'scan positive' CES are after discharge. The investigators have called the study subsection 'Back or Leg pain with Bladder symptoms' (BLB) study because this most accurately describes the symptoms patients have and we know that describing something negatively to patients (e.g. medically unexplained symptoms)is found by patients to be unhelpful.

The BLB study asks three main questions; do patients with 'scan negative' CES have symptoms of bowel, bladder, sexual dysfunction and lower limb weakness and sensory abnormalities due to a functional disorder?; do a proportion of patients with 'scan negative' CES have missed neurological disease?; what are the outcomes of patients with 'scan negative' and 'scan positive' CES after three months?

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Edinburgh, United Kingdom, EH4 2XU
        • Department of Neurosciences, Western General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 96 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

161 participants admitted to the Western General Hospital, Edinburgh with possible CES.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Ability to give informed consent
  2. Able to complete online or paper questionnaire.
  3. Patients admitted to the regional neurosurgical unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh with suspected cauda equina syndrome for an MRI scan. Demographic data from all patients attending any NHS Lothian site who have an MRI scan for suspected CES.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age less than 16
  2. Inability to communicate (e.g. do not speak English)
  3. Inability to complete written or oral surveys or give informed consent
  4. Age over 100. The upper age limit is set at 100 to allow the greatest number of participants the opportunity to take part. As the study is a follow up study concerns about mortality and high drop out in this age group led to the upper limit of 100 being set.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
BLB patients
Patients admitted for urgent MRI with possible cauda equina syndrome will be consented for questionnaires and examination.
Patients with in the BLB patients study will have interview and questionnaire carried out.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
What proportion of patients with 'scan negative' CES have a functional disorder by clinical consensus.
Time Frame: Nov 15-Aug 18
Percent of patients with 'scan negative' CES and a functional disorder.
Nov 15-Aug 18

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Demographics (age, gender, work status) in patients with 'scan positive' and 'scan negative' CES.
Time Frame: Nov 15-Aug 18
Demographics
Nov 15-Aug 18
Neurological examination findings, using Medical Research Council (MRC) grading and standardised sensory and reflex examinations in patients with 'scan positive' and 'scan negative' CES.
Time Frame: Nov 15-Aug 18
MRC grading of strength (0-5, from no power to full power)
Nov 15-Aug 18
Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HADs) scores and Structured clinical interview for DSM (SCID) findings in patients with 'scan positive' and 'scan negative' CES at onset of symptoms and HADs scores three months after symptom onset.
Time Frame: Nov 15-Aug 18
Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HADs) scores (<8 negative, 8-10 mild, 8-14 moderate, 15-21 severe).
Nov 15-Aug 18
Patient priorities after discharge rated using a visual analogue scale. Options will be pain, bladder symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual function, sensory disturbance, financial, worry/stress/low mood.
Time Frame: Nov 15-Aug 18
visual analogue scale from 1 would most value help with to 8 would least value help required
Nov 15-Aug 18
The number of patients with 'scan negative' CES have other neurological disease causing their symptoms.
Time Frame: Nov 15-Aug 18
Number of patients who have a neurological diagnosis explaining their symptoms at up to one year after discharged with CES symptoms.
Nov 15-Aug 18
The number of patients with 'scan negative' CES who have sacral nerve dysfunction found on EMG.
Time Frame: Nov 15-Aug 18
with 'scan negative' CES who have sacral nerve dysfunction found on EMG.
Nov 15-Aug 18
Bladder function using Urinary Symptom Profile (USP) in patients with 'scan positive' and 'scan negative' CES at symptom onset and at three months after discharge.
Time Frame: Nov 15-Aug 18
Urinary Symptom Profile splits symptoms up into stress incontinence(0 none to 9 severe), overactive bladder (0 none to 21 severe), low stream (0 none to nine severe)
Nov 15-Aug 18
Bowel function using The Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction score in patients with 'scan positive' and 'scan negative' CES at symptom onset and at three months after discharge.
Time Frame: Nov 15-Aug 18
10-13 is moderate dysfunction, 14 or over is severe dysfunction
Nov 15-Aug 18
Sexual function using the Arizona Sexual Experiences Questionnaire in patients with 'scan positive' and 'scan negative' CES at symptom onset and at three months after discharge.
Time Frame: Nov 15-Aug 18
Abnormal is >19 or 5 or more on any item or 4 or more on three items
Nov 15-Aug 18

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ingrid Hoeritzauer, University of Edinburgh

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 6, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 30, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cauda Equina Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Questionnaires and examination

Subscribe