- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01791127
Safety and Performance Study of the Siello S Pacing Lead (SIELLO)
May 12, 2020 updated by: Biotronik, Inc.
The objective of the SIELLO study is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the BIOTRONIK Siello S pacing lead.
Study Overview
Status
Terminated
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
1758
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
La Jolla, California, United States
-
La Mesa, California, United States
-
-
Connecticut
-
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
-
Stamford, Connecticut, United States
-
-
Florida
-
Plantation, Florida, United States
-
Saint Petersburg, Florida, United States
-
-
Georgia
-
Cumming, Georgia, United States
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States
-
Jerseyville, Illinois, United States
-
Park Ridge, Illinois, United States
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
-
Valparaiso, Indiana, United States
-
-
Iowa
-
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
-
Detroit, Michigan, United States
-
Grand Blanc, Michigan, United States
-
Warren, Michigan, United States
-
Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States
-
-
Mississippi
-
Tupelo, Mississippi, United States
-
-
Missouri
-
Cape Girardeau, Missouri, United States
-
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
-
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
-
-
Nebraska
-
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
-
-
New Jersey
-
Bridgewater, New Jersey, United States
-
Haddon Heights, New Jersey, United States
-
-
New York
-
Flushing, New York, United States
-
-
North Carolina
-
Concord, North Carolina, United States
-
-
North Dakota
-
Fargo, North Dakota, United States
-
-
Ohio
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States
-
Middletown, Ohio, United States
-
Steubenville, Ohio, United States
-
Toledo, Ohio, United States
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
-
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States
-
-
South Carolina
-
Anderson, South Carolina, United States
-
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
-
Columbia, South Carolina, United States
-
Greenville, South Carolina, United States
-
Lancaster, South Carolina, United States
-
Rock Hill, South Carolina, United States
-
West Columbia, South Carolina, United States
-
-
Texas
-
Alice, Texas, United States
-
Bedford, Texas, United States
-
Orange, Texas, United States
-
San Antonio, Texas, United States
-
Victoria, Texas, United States
-
-
Utah
-
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
-
-
Virginia
-
Fredericksburg, Virginia, United States
-
Richmond, Virginia, United States
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
-
-
Wyoming
-
Cheyenne, Wyoming, United States
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
The patients selected for participation should be from the investigators' general patient population according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Candidate for de novo implantation of a BIOTRONIK pacemaker system, including one or two Siello S leads. Candidate meets recommendation for pacemaker system implant put forth by guidelines of relevant professional societies.
- Able to understand the nature of the study and provide informed consent.
- Available for follow-up visits on a regular basis at the investigational site for the expected 5 years of follow-up.
- Age greater than or equal to 18 years.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Enrolled in any other investigational clinical study.
- Currently implanted with a pacemaker or ICD device.
- Planned cardiac surgical procedures or interventional measures within the next 6 months.
- Expected to receive a heart transplant within 1 year.
- Life expectancy less than 1 year.
- Presence of another life-threatening, underlying illness separate from their cardiac disorder.
- Pregnant at the time of enrollment.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Case-Only
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Pacemaker Therapy
Patients with a market-released BIOTRONIK pacemaker system including one or two Siello S leads.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Atrial Siello S Lead Safety at 12 Months
Time Frame: 12 month
|
The overall percentage subjects with adverse events that require additional invasive intervention to resolve, related to the Siello leads implanted in the atrium with a BIOTRONIK Evia pacemaker device through 12 months follow-up.
This was evaluated as an adverse event free-rate (AEFR).
|
12 month
|
|
Ventricular Siello S Lead Safety at 12 Months
Time Frame: 12-month
|
The overall percentage of subjects with adverse events that require additional invasive intervention to resolve, related to the Siello leads implanted in the ventricle with a BIOTRONIK Evia pacemaker device through 12 months follow-up.
This was evaluated as an adverse event free-rate (AEFR).
|
12-month
|
|
Siello S Lead Effectiveness at 12 Months
Time Frame: 12-months
|
Success rate of the implanted system to sense and deliver pacing at 12-months post implant.
|
12-months
|
|
Ventricular Siello S Lead Safety at 5 Years
Time Frame: 5-Years
|
The overall percentage of subjects with adverse events that require additional invasive intervention to resolve, related to the Siello leads implanted in the ventricle with a BIOTRONIK Evia pacemaker device through 5 years follow-up.
This was evaluated as an adverse event free-rate (AEFR).
|
5-Years
|
|
Ventricular Siello S Lead Safety at 5 Years - Individual Adverse Event Rates
Time Frame: 5-years
|
Evaluation of the individual adverse events contributing to the outcome measure 'Ventricular Siello S Lead Safety at 5 Years'.
|
5-years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Atrial Siello S Lead Safety at 5 Years
Time Frame: 5-years
|
The overall percentage of subjects with adverse events that require additional invasive intervention to resolve, related to the Siello leads implanted in the atrium with a BIOTRONIK Evia pacemaker device through 5 years follow-up.
This was evaluated as an adverse event free-rate (AEFR).
|
5-years
|
|
Atrial Siello S Lead Safety at 5 Years - Individual Adverse Event Rates
Time Frame: 5-years
|
Evaluation of the individual adverse events contributing to the outcome measure 'Atrial Siello S Lead Safety at 5 Years'.
|
5-years
|
|
Pacing Threshold Measurements for Siello S Leads at 12 Months
Time Frame: 12-months
|
Pacing threshold measurements for Siello S leads implanted in the atrium or ventricle at the 12 month follow-up visit.
|
12-months
|
|
Sensing Measurements for Siello S Leads at 12 Months
Time Frame: 12-months
|
Sensing measurements for Siello S leads implanted in the atrium or ventricle at the 12 month follow-up visit.
|
12-months
|
|
Impedance Measurements for Siello S Leads at 12 Months
Time Frame: 12-months
|
Impedance measurements for Siello S leads implanted in the atrium or ventricle at the 12 month follow-up visit.
|
12-months
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Other Adverse Events
Time Frame: 5-years
|
The overall percentage of subjects with reportable adverse events that were excluded from primary and secondary objectives and occurred through 5 years of follow-up.
This was evaluated as an adverse event free-rate (AEFR).
Adverse events were considered reportable if the event was related to the implant procedure, implanted pulse generator, or implanted leads.
|
5-years
|
|
Siello S Lead Effectiveness at 5 Years
Time Frame: 5-years
|
Success rate of the implanted system to deliver long-term pacing at 5-years post-implant.
|
5-years
|
|
Pacing Threshold Measurements for Siello S Leads Through 5 Years
Time Frame: 5-years
|
Pacing threshold measurements for Siello S leads implanted in the atrium or ventricle through 5 years of follow-up.
|
5-years
|
|
Sensing Measurements for Siello S Leads Through 5 Years
Time Frame: 5-years
|
Sensing measurements for Siello S leads implanted in the atrium or ventricle through the 5 year follow-up visit.
|
5-years
|
|
Impedance Measurements for Siello S Leads Through 5 Years
Time Frame: 5-years
|
Impedance measurements for Siello S leads implanted in the atrium or ventricle through the 5 year follow-up visit.
|
5-years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 13, 2013
Primary Completion (Actual)
April 17, 2019
Study Completion (Actual)
April 17, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 12, 2013
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 12, 2013
First Posted (Estimate)
February 13, 2013
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
June 1, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 12, 2020
Last Verified
May 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- G110221
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Safety and Effectiveness of the Siello S Lead
-
Impulse DynamicsRecruitingEvaluate the Safety and Useability of the ODOCOR II Intra-cardiac LeadSpain, Germany, Italy
-
Ocon Medical Ltd.CompletedTo Assess the Safety, Effectiveness and User Experience of the Scu 300A IUBBulgaria, Romania
-
The People's Hospital of GaozhouCompletedExploring the Effectiveness and Safety of Amino Acid Peritoneal Dialysis SolutionChina
-
StelKast, Inc.TerminatedSurvivorship and Long-term Safety and Effectiveness of the Stelkast Surpass Acetabular SystemUnited States
-
Chinese PLA General HospitalUnknownEvaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Conditioned Medium-derived Pleiotropic Factor in Treating Donor SitesChina
-
Jena University HospitalCompletedEffectiveness and Safety of the Seldinger Wire Technique Using a 145 cm Guidewire With the Modified Seldinger Technique Using a 70 cm GuidewireGermany
-
Becton, Dickinson and CompanyCompletedEffectiveness and Safety of Pre-filled Flush SyringeChina
-
University of MoliseCompletedEvaluate Response to Treatment Both Biochemically and Virologically to Determine the Safety and Effectiveness of Bulevirtide Therapy in HDV PatientsItaly
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationCompletedTo Evaluate Effectiveness of the Gait Trainer in Increasing the Functionality and Spatiotemporal Parameters of Gait of 4 Patients.Israel
-
Elina BrinckNot yet recruitingThe Effect of S-ketamine on Pharmacokinetics of Morphine, Hydromorphone, and Buprenorphine