Interprofessional Collaboration in Health Care and Outcomes in Nursing Homes (IPCIHC)

February 12, 2013 updated by: Giannoula Tsakitzidis, Universiteit Antwerpen

The Effectiveness of Learning to Collaborate Interprofessionally on Healthcare Processes and Outcomes in Nursing Homes: a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in Primary Care.

Title: The effectiveness of learning to collaborate interprofessionally on healthcare processes and outcomes in nursing homes: a cluster randomized controlled trial in primary care.

The ageing of the population is expected to be a major driver of increasing demand for more complex and continuous care. The delivery of health care for this population requires high level of coordinated teamwork and efforts. Interprofessional collaboration can improve healthcare processes and outcomes. It assumes a model of working together. It is a process by which professionals develop an integrated and cohesive answer to the needs of the patients. In this study the possible effects of learning to interprofessionally collaborate will be investigated on health care processes and outcomes for chronic geriatric patients in nursing homes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

  1. Introduction

    The extent to which different health care professionals work together can affect the quality of the health care that they provide. Government bodies and organizations of different medical and paramedical professions emphasize the importance of interprofessional collaboration in health care (IPCIHC). It assumes a model of working together particular with attention for the process by which professionals develop an integrated and cohesive answer to the needs of the client/family/population. The outcome is rather difficult to be evaluated and therefore it is important to understand the effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving IPCIHC and so improving quality of care.

    Despite the large number of publications on interprofessional collaboration, a higher quality of research, evidence and more rigorous evaluation is needed to support decision makers. It is especially required to be specific when conclusions for certain population and context should be drawn. The ageing of the population is expected to be a major driver of increasing demand for long-term care services. Delivery of health care for this population requires high levels of coordinated teamwork and efforts to provide a good quality of care. But what is quality of care? To assess 'quality of care' it first has to be defined and that depends on whether one assesses only the performance of practitioners or also the contribution of patients and the health care system. As described by the American Medical Association, quality of care is "care that consistently contributes to the improvement or maintenance of quality and/or duration of life". Donabedian conceptualized quality of care as having an inter-related structure, process and outcome components. Structured such as for example 'staffing', process as actions on the patients such as for example restraint. And outcome indicators assess patient's end result such as for example falls.

    Interprofessional collaboration as an intervention seems to result in a positive effect for health care outcomes. Nevertheless there is need for more concrete information on effect of interprofessional collaboration for chronic geriatric patients. Overall the positive effect of interprofessional collaboration as an intervention for chronic geriatric care is mainly found for outcomes such as fall incidence, transition, quality of life, medication change and costs.

  2. Research question What are the effects of learning to collaborate according an interprofessional model on healthcare processes and outcomes for chronic geriatric patients in nursing homes?
  3. Study objectives

3.1 Primary objective To investigate the effectiveness of learning to interprofessional collaborate on quality indicators of 'care and safety' (fall incidence, medication, hospital visits) and on quality indicators of 'caregivers and care organization' (absenteeism).

3.2 Second objective To investigate the effectiveness of learning to interprofessional collaborate on the level of intensity of care and knowledge of interprofessional collaboration as a working model.

3.3 Third objective To investigate the effectiveness of learning to interprofessional collaborate for the chronic geriatric patient on the level of health-related quality of life, independence and cognitive functioning.

4 Study design

The investigators will set up a cluster randomized controlled trial in primary health care aiming to investigate the effectiveness of training in interprofessional collaboration. Patient oriented outcomes will be assessed in chronic geriatric patients in nursing homes, including a pre-post assessment of the intervention with short and long term follow-up.

Eligible nursing homes will be invited to participate in this study as intervention group or as control group. When informed consent is received, baseline measurements will be performed. The nursing homes will be randomly allocated to control or intervention group. Data collection in their residents will be performed by researcher assistants blind for allocation, and not involved in data analysis.

For the control group data will be gathered only at baseline and at 12 months. For the intervention group data will be gathered at baseline, some measurements will be done at 6 months and then again at 12 month point. All data will be managed by a researcher who will not be involved in data analysis.

After allocation, the research team will discuss an allocation specific measurement schedule with the management board of the nursing homes. Once the schedule is agreed by management board and research team, all nursing home personnel will also receive allocation specific information. All personnel will be asked to actively participate in the study and will be asked for informed consent. Finally, also the eligible residents of the nursing homes will receive the allocation specific information and will be asked for informed consent.

The intervention consists an educational module titled 'to learn to collaborate interprofessionally'. The intervention concerns two educational modules. The first module (module 1) is a 10 hours course. It is a problem-based interactive learning method with real life cases. This first module concerns definition, getting to know each other (the other disciplines), making a care plan, discus ethical cases, reflecting on the competence of 'interprofessional collaborator' and finally presenting reflection and feedback.

Also the second module (module 2) is a 10 hours course. In this module 2 it is important to get on the personal level. Small teams will be formed. The teams will be guided by a tutor/educator. In 3 sessions of 3 hours participating professional will have to reflect upon their competence as collaborator and check what has to be learnt. Also in this module bottle necks in collaboration will be collected by the tutor/educator. The intervention will take place at the nursing homes and if needed for logistic issues it will take place at the University of Antwerp. In the last session of one hour the team members have to present what insight they gained through the sessions about themselves as collaborators. Finally they formulate a learning goal for themselves for the future.

In this study quality of care is described for this population in terms of the healthcare processes and outcomes expressed in the chosen outcomes (on macro, meso and micro level) and the interrelation of these. The investigators are aware of the fact not all outcomes for quality of care can be measured for this specific population. So the investigators chose on basis of the literature and discussion with experts the outcomes. The main hypothesis for this study is: the intervention will have effect on the quality of care for chronic geriatric patients in nursing homes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Nursing homes are eligible for participating when the residents meet the following criteria

  • age 65+
  • speaking and understanding the Dutch language
  • living at least ine year in nursing home
  • Mini-mental state examination of at least 24/30

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: interprofessioal education module
an interprofessional education module will be given to learn to collaborate interprofessionally.
An educational module

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of fallers in nursing homes and number of recurrent fallers
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Number of medication per day per resident
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Number of different medication per resident
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Number of hospital visits
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Length of stay in hospital
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Number of days absent at work of staff
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Number of absent staff
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Body weight of residents (in kg)
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Description of restraint policy
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Number of staff participated in training/courses
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Number of volunteers in nursing homes
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Intensity of interprofessional collaboration of the professionals; questionnaire.
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Health related quality of life of the resident
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Independence for activities of daily life
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Cognitive functioning: Mini Mental state examination.
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 1, 2014

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 8, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 15, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 15, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2013

Last Verified

February 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Focus of Study is Interprofessional Collaboration.

Clinical Trials on Interprofessional collaboration in health care module

Subscribe