Hippocampal Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation for Small Cell Lung Cancer

"A Phase II Trial of Hippocampal-Sparing Cranial Irradiation (PCI) for Small-Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC)"

The Investigators are looking to compare standard treatment for the management of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) which is prophylactic cranial Irradiation (PCI) (shown to be very good in patient survival) with cranial sparing PCI. Although standard of care PCI is successful in patient survival it also has neurologic side-effects. The Investigators are hoping the cranial sparing PCI has the same positive survival results with the added benefit of lowering neurological side-effects.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The standard of care in management of small cell lung cancer consists of chemotherapy plus thoracic radiation followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) based on a randomized trial that demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) with PCI. Unfortunately radiation therapy to the brain is associated with neurocognitive toxicity, which may be at least in part related to radiation induced injury to neural progenitor cells in the hippocampus. Both human and animal data suggest an inverse relationship between radiation dose to the hippocampus and performance on neuropsychological testing. We hypothesize that hippocampal sparing PCI will allow improved performance on tests of short term memory and executive function compared to a historical control (RTOG 0212) receiving the same dose of conventional PCI. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate performance on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised for delayed recall at 6 months following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to the historical control. Secondary objectives are to estimate: 1) composite cognitive function following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to the historical control and 2) the rate of metastases in the hippocampus at 2 years following hippocampal-sparing PCI. The long term goal of this research is to reduce the long term sequelae of radiation therapy for both primary and metastatic brain tumors.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21227
        • Bayview Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient must have newly diagnosed and confirmed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC)
  • Patient must have a performance status of 1 or higher
  • Patients must not have received previous irradiation to the brain
  • Patients must have limited stage disease with complete response to chemotherapy and consolidative chest radiotherapy that was documented at least on standard chest x-rays within one month of study entry
  • Negative MRI or CT scan of the brain at least one month before protocol entry
  • Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test and also agree to use adequate contraceptives while on protocol
  • Patient must be able to understand and sign the informed consent document
  • Patient must be informed of the investigational aspect to this trial prior to singing the informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients receiving prior external beam irradiation to the head or neck, including any form of stereotactic irradiation
  • Radiographic evidence of brain metastases and/or ipsilateral lung metastases/malignant pleural effusion
  • Planned concurrent chemotherapy or antitumoral agent during PCI
  • Concomitant malignancy or malignancy within the past five years other than nonmelanomatous skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
  • Patients with minimal pleural effusion evident on chest X-ray; minimal pleural effusion visible on chest CT is allowed.
  • Patients with epilepsy requiring permanent oral medication
  • Patients must not have a serious medical or psychiatric illness that would, in the opinion of the investigator, prevent informed consent or completion of protocol treatment, and/or follow-up visits.
  • Patients may not take Memantine. This is the only eligibility criterion that has been added to those of RTOG 0212, since some physicians might now prescribe Memantine. This medication would not have been given at the time of enrollment on RTOG 0212 and its administration could confound the results of this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Hippocampal-sparing PCI
Hippocampal-sparing PCI 25 Gy in 10 fractions
Hippocampal-sparing Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effect of Hippocampal-sparing Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation (PCI) on Possible Delayed Recall Toxicity as Assessed by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) for Delayed Recall
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months post radiation treatment
The primary endpoint of this study is cognitive function or memory. Memory is measured by participant performance on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised for delayed recall (HVLT-R-Delayed Recall) at 6 months following hippocampal-sparing PCI. The HVLT-Delayed minimum and Maximum scores are 0-12. A higher score means a better outcome.
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months post radiation treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCI
Time Frame: Baseline

Composite cognitive function following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to a historical control receiving standard PCI.

HVLT-R Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R)

  • Total Recall (0-36) higher = better
  • Delayed Recall (0-12) higher = better
  • Discrimination (-12 to 12) higher = better Trail Making A & B (0-300 seconds) higher = poorer Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA) (0-180) higher = better Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) (0-30) higher = better Perceptual Comparison Test (PCT) (0-128) higher = better Brief Test of Attention (BTA) (0-20) higher = better Calibrated Ideational Fluency Assessment (CIFA)
  • Letter Word Fluency (0-120) higher = better
  • Category Word Fluency (0-120) higher = better
  • Verbal Fluency (0-240) higher = better Learning and Memory
  • Verbal Composite T score (mean = 100, standard deviation = 15), higher = better
  • Visual Composite T score (mean = 100, standard deviation = 15), higher = better
Baseline
Compare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCI
Time Frame: 6 months post radiation treatment

Composite cognitive function following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to a historical control receiving standard PCI.

HVLT-R Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R)

  • Total Recall (0-36) higher = better
  • Delayed Recall (0-12) higher = better
  • Discrimination (-12 to 12) higher = better Trail Making A & B (0-300 seconds) higher = poorer Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA) (0-180) higher = better Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) (0-30) higher = better Perceptual Comparison Test (PCT) (0-128) higher = better Brief Test of Attention (BTA) (0-20) higher = better Calibrated Ideational Fluency Assessment (CIFA)
  • Letter Word Fluency (0-120) higher = better
  • Category Word Fluency (0-120) higher = better
  • Verbal Fluency (0-240) higher = better Learning and Memory
  • Verbal Composite T score (mean = 100, standard deviation = 15), higher = better
  • Visual Composite T score (mean = 100, standard deviation = 15), higher = better
6 months post radiation treatment
Compare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCI
Time Frame: 12 months post radiation treatment

Composite cognitive function following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to a historical control receiving standard PCI.

HVLT-R Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R)

  • Total Recall (0-36) higher = better
  • Delayed Recall (0-12) higher = better
  • Discrimination (-12 to 12) higher = better Trail Making A & B (0-300 seconds) higher = poorer Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA) (0-180) higher = better Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) (0-30) higher = better Perceptual Comparison Test (PCT) (0-128) higher = better Brief Test of Attention (BTA) (0-20) higher = better Calibrated Ideational Fluency Assessment (CIFA)
  • Letter Word Fluency (0-120) higher = better
  • Category Word Fluency (0-120) higher = better
  • Verbal Fluency (0-240) higher = better Learning and Memory
  • Verbal Composite T score (mean = 100, standard deviation = 15), higher = better
  • Visual Composite T score (mean = 100, standard deviation = 15), higher = better
12 months post radiation treatment
Compare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months post radiation treatment

Evaluate quality of life following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to historical control receiving standard PCI. Difference between 6 months and baseline.

Questions on the Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) assessment are on a four-point scale from "not at all" to "very much". Raw scores are linearly converted to a 0-100 scale with higher scores reflecting higher levels of function and higher levels of symptom burden. Questions on the QLQ-C30 cover the following:

  • Dyspnoea
  • Insomnia
  • Appetite
  • Constipation
  • Diarrhoea
  • Finances
  • Fatigue
  • Nausea/Vomiting
  • Pain
  • Physical Function
  • Role Function
  • Emotional Function
  • Cognitive Function
  • Social Function
  • Global QoL
Baseline and 6 months post radiation treatment
Compare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment QLQ-C30
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months post radiation treatment

Evaluate quality of life following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to historical control receiving standard PCI. Difference between 12 months and baseline.

Questions on the Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) assessment are on a four-point scale from "not at all" to "very much". Raw scores are linearly converted to a 0-100 scale with higher scores reflecting higher levels of function and higher levels of symptom burden. Questions on the QLQ-C30 cover the following:

  • Dyspnoea
  • Insomnia
  • Appetite
  • Constipation
  • Diarrhoea
  • Finances
  • Fatigue
  • Nausea/Vomiting
  • Pain
  • Physical Function
  • Role Function
  • Emotional Function
  • Cognitive Function
  • Social Function
  • Global QoL
Baseline and 12 months post radiation treatment
Compare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months post radiation treatment

Evaluate quality of life following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to historical control receiving standard PCI. Difference between 6 months and baseline.

Questions on the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20) are rated on a four-point scale ('not at all', 'a little', 'quite a bit' and 'very much'), and are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores represent more severe symptoms. Questions on the QLQ-BN20 cover the following:

  • Headaches
  • Seizures
  • Drowsy
  • Hair loss
  • Itching
  • Weakness
  • Bladder
  • Future Uncertainty
  • Visual Disorder
  • Motor Dysfunction
  • Communication Deficit
Baseline and 6 months post radiation treatment
Compare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Using the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20).
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months post radiation treatment

Evaluate quality of life following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to historical control receiving standard PCI. Difference between 12 months and baseline.

Questions on the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20) are rated on a four-point scale ('not at all', 'a little', 'quite a bit' and 'very much'), and are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores represent more severe symptoms. Questions on the QLQ-BN20 cover the following:

  • Headaches
  • Seizures
  • Drowsy
  • Hair loss
  • Itching
  • Weakness
  • Bladder
  • Future Uncertainty
  • Visual Disorder
  • Motor Dysfunction
  • Communication Deficit

Headaches Seizures Drowsy Hair loss Itching Weakness Bladder Future Uncertainty Scale Visual Disorder Scale Motor Dysfunction Scale Communication Deficit Scale

Baseline and 12 months post radiation treatment
Number Participants With Hippocampus Brain Metastases Following Sparing PCI
Time Frame: 12 months
The number of participants with brain metastases after sparing PCI treatment was assessed to be compared to two existing studies.
12 months
Assess if Development of Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis Following Sparing PCI is Higher Than Expected
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months post radiation treatment
Determine whether development of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis following hippocampal-sparing PCI is higher than expected.
6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months post radiation treatment
Percentage of Participants Surviving Following Hippocampal-sparing PCI
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post radiation treatment
To evaluate the survival rates of study participants following hippocampal-sparing PCI.
Up to 24 months post radiation treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 11, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 18, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 18, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 22, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

There is no plan to share data with PIs who are not included on the study team.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on SCLC

Clinical Trials on Hippocampal-sparing Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation

Subscribe