A Study to Compare the Effect of Transipeg 2.95 g or Forlax Junior 4 g in Children With Constipation

August 12, 2015 updated by: Bayer

A Double-blind, Randomized, Uninational, Multicenter, Two Parallel Groups, Active Controlled Study to Compare the Effect of the Treatment With Transipeg 2.95 g or Forlax Junior 4 g in Children With Constipation

The study design combines a long-term safety and a dose range determination objective. The first 8 weeks of the study were primarily intended for the dose range determination, while the later visits were used for the comparison of long-term safety between the groups.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

97

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105 AZ
      • Eindhoven, Netherlands, 5623 EJ
      • Veldhoven, Netherlands, 5504 DB
      • Woerden, Netherlands, 3447 GN

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 15 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Childhood functional constipation
  • 6 months to <16 years of age
  • Male or female
  • For females of childbearing potential (after menarche): negative pregnancy test
  • Moderately severe to severe constipation, defined as stool frequency <3 stools/week
  • Informed consent signed by parent(s) or legal acceptable representative(s), after sufficient oral and written information before entering the study, to be documented by the investigators in the Case Report Form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Functional non-retentive fecal incontinence
  • Known metabolic or endocrine disorders (s.a. hypothyroidism)
  • Neurologic disorders (s.a. spina bifida or spinal cord anomaly)
  • Hirschsprung's disease (congenital megacolon)
  • Anal anomaly
  • Gastrointestinal surgery
  • Drug induced constipation
  • Mental retardation
  • Cerebral palsy
  • Treatment with other laxatives
  • Drugs influencing gastrointestinal function (e.g., cisapride, erythromicin, imodium)
  • Prior bowel surgery, except appendectomy
  • Earlier participation in this trial
  • Concurrent participation in any other clinical trial
  • Participation in any other clinical study 6 months prior to inclusion
  • Any use of a Macrogol within 2 months prior to inclusion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Macrogol (Transipeg)
Up to 4 sachets per day based on individual titration
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Macrogol (Forlax)
Up to 4 sachets per day based on individual titration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Symptom Based Weekly Total Sum Score (TSS) Over 52 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Baseline (Week 0), Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Change From Baseline in Total Sum Score (TSS) at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
Baseline, Week 52
Short Term Change of Total Sum Score (TSS): Average of Weeks 1 to 8 Minus Baseline
Time Frame: Average of Weeks 1 to 8
Average of Weeks 1 to 8
Long Term Change of Total Sum Score (TSS): Average of Weeks 26 and 52 Minus Baseline
Time Frame: Average of Weeks 26 and 52
Average of Weeks 26 and 52
Overall Change of Total Sum Score (TSS): Average of all Diaries Obtained Minus Baseline
Time Frame: Average up to 52 weeks
Average up to 52 weeks
Dose Range Determination: Mean Dose Based on Sachets Used
Time Frame: Up to 52 weeks.
Up to 52 weeks.
Dose Range Determination: Mean Dose per Kilogram Body Weight Based on Sachets Used
Time Frame: Up to 52 weeks
Up to 52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Percentage of Treatment Success
Time Frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Defecation Frequency
Time Frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Consistency of the Feces
Time Frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Strains During Defecation
Time Frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Quantity of Stools
Time Frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Percentage of Subjects With Pain During Defecation
Time Frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Frequency of Pain (Times per Week)
Time Frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Percentage of Subjects With Abdominal Pain
Time Frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Frequency of Abdominal Pain (Times per Week)
Time Frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Relation of Abdominal Pain With Defecation
Time Frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Fecal Incontinence (Times per Week) and Fecal Incontinence (Times per Week) at Night
Time Frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Percentage of Subjects with Fecal Incontinence at Specified Time points
Time Frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Percentage of Subjects With Urgency for Defecation
Time Frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Frequency of Urgency for Defecation (Times per Week)
Time Frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Percentage of Subjects With Urine Incontinence (UI) During Day and Night
Time Frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Frequency of Urine Incontinence During Day and Night (Times per Week)
Time Frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Percentage of Subjects With Good, Moderate or Bad Appetite
Time Frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Average Score for Diary Reported Diarrhoea
Time Frame: Week 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Week 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Average Score for Diary Reported Flatulence
Time Frame: Week 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Week 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Average Score for Diary Reported Nausea
Time Frame: Week 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Week 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2006

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2008

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 13, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 13, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2015

Last Verified

August 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 12052
  • 2015-000081-63 (EUDRACT_NUMBER)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Constipation

Clinical Trials on Macrogol (Transipeg, BAY81-8430)

Subscribe