Study to Gather Information on the Acceptability of a New Flavor System With Increasing Levels of 2, 4, 6 g or Higher of Mannitol for PEG 3350 in Subjects Having Infrequent Bowel Movements.

October 20, 2020 updated by: Bayer

A Single Center, Open-label, Parallel Arm, Phase 4 Study to Evaluate the Acceptability of a Prototype Flavor System With Ascending Levels of 2,4,6 Grams or Higher of Mannitol for PEG 3350 Laxative in Subjects Suffering With Occasional Constipation.

Study to gather information on the acceptability of a new flavor system with increasing levels of 2, 4, 6 g or higher of the sugar alcohol Mannitol for Polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3350 a drug stimulating bowel movement to pass stool in subjects having infrequent bowel movements. The taste of the various preparations will be measured by use of a rating scale.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38151
        • Merck Consumer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Male and female subjects, aged 18 years and older, suffering with occasional constipation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dosing arm 1
MiraLAX Sachet (17g) + Flavor blend (2g mannitol total)
Oral solution, 17g polyethylene glycol, one time
Oral, 2g, 4g, 6g, 8g and 10g mannitol, one time
Experimental: Dosing arm 2
MiraLAX Sachet (17g) + Flavor blend + additional 2g mannitol (4g mannitol total)
Oral solution, 17g polyethylene glycol, one time
Oral, 2g, 4g, 6g, 8g and 10g mannitol, one time
Experimental: Dosing arm 3
MiraLAX Sachet (17g) + Flavor blend + additional 4g mannitol (6g mannitol total)
Oral solution, 17g polyethylene glycol, one time
Oral, 2g, 4g, 6g, 8g and 10g mannitol, one time
Experimental: Dosing arm 4
MiraLAX Sachet (17g) + Flavor blend + additional 6g mannitol (8g mannitol total)
Oral solution, 17g polyethylene glycol, one time
Oral, 2g, 4g, 6g, 8g and 10g mannitol, one time
Experimental: Dosing arm 5
MiraLAX Sachet (17g) + Flavor blend + additional 8g mannitol (10g mannitol total)
Oral solution, 17g polyethylene glycol, one time
Oral, 2g, 4g, 6g, 8g and 10g mannitol, one time

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With the Opinion of the Products' Flavor
Time Frame: 1 day
Evaluated by 7-point scales: 1-extremely dislike, 2-moderately dislike, 3-dislike somewhat, 4-neither like nor dislike, 5-like somewhat, 6-moderately like, 7-extremely like
1 day
Number of Participants With the Opinion of the Amount of Flavor in the Products
Time Frame: 1 day
Evaluated by 7-point scales: -3 -extremely weak, -2 -somewhat weak, -1 -slightly weak, 0 -just the right level of flavor, 1 -slightly intense, 2 -moderately intense, 3 -much too intense
1 day
Number of Participants With the Opinion of the Products' Sweetness
Time Frame: 1 day
Evaluated by 7-point scales: -3 -no sweetness needed, -2 -needs to be moderately sweeter, -1 -needs to be a little sweeter, 0 -just the right level of sweetness, 1 -slightly too sweet, 2 -moderately sweet, 3 -much too sweet
1 day
Number of Participants With/Without Cooling Sensation in the Products.
Time Frame: 1 day
Whether or not subjects felt a cooling sensation (yes/no).
1 day
Number of Participants With Different Levels of Cooling Sensation of the Products
Time Frame: 1 day
Evaluated by 4-point scales: 1 -barely perceptible, 2 -slightly noticeable, 3 -moderately noticeable, 4 -extremely noticeable
1 day
Number of Participants With the Opinion of Aftertaste in the Products.
Time Frame: 1 day
Whether or not subjects experienced aftertaste (yes/no).
1 day
Number of Participants With Different Levels of Aftertaste of the Products
Time Frame: 1 day
Evaluated by 3-point scales: 1 -slightly noticeable, 2 -moderately noticeable, 3 -extremely noticeable
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With no Bowel Movement
Time Frame: 1 day
The number of subjects who did not report any bowel movement was evaluated.
1 day
Time to First Bowel Movement (In Hours)
Time Frame: 1 day
The mean and standard deviation of the time to first bowel movement in hours were evaluated.
1 day
Number of Participants for Gas Rating
Time Frame: 1 day
A gas rating score of 0 means that there was no gas experienced, while a score of 1 represents slight gas experienced, 2 represents moderate gas experienced and 3 represents severe gas experienced.
1 day
Number of Participants for Bloating Rating
Time Frame: 1 day
A score of zero represents no bloating, while a score of 1 represents slight bloating, 2 represents moderate bloating and 3 represents severe bloating.
1 day
Number of Participants for Abdominal Discomfort Rating
Time Frame: 1 day
A score of 0 represents no abdominal pain, 1 represents slight abdominal pain, 2 represents moderate abdominal pain and 3 represents severe abdominal pain.
1 day
Number of Participants With no Successful Bowel Movement
Time Frame: 1 day
The number of subjects who did not report the successful bowel movement was evaluated.
1 day
Time to First Successful Bowel Movement (In Hours)
Time Frame: 1 day
The mean and standard deviation of the time to first successful bowel movement in hours were evaluated.
1 day
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event
Time Frame: 1 day
Including serious adverse events and adverse events.
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 13, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 19, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

March 19, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 12, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 20, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Constipation

Clinical Trials on Polyethylene glycol (MiraLAX, BAY81-8430)

3
Subscribe