- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04534465
Study to Gather Information on the Acceptability of a New Flavor System With Increasing Levels of 2, 4, 6 g or Higher of Mannitol for PEG 3350 in Subjects Having Infrequent Bowel Movements.
October 20, 2020 updated by: Bayer
A Single Center, Open-label, Parallel Arm, Phase 4 Study to Evaluate the Acceptability of a Prototype Flavor System With Ascending Levels of 2,4,6 Grams or Higher of Mannitol for PEG 3350 Laxative in Subjects Suffering With Occasional Constipation.
Study to gather information on the acceptability of a new flavor system with increasing levels of 2, 4, 6 g or higher of the sugar alcohol Mannitol for Polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3350 a drug stimulating bowel movement to pass stool in subjects having infrequent bowel movements.
The taste of the various preparations will be measured by use of a rating scale.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
50
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Tennessee
-
Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38151
- Merck Consumer Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 60 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Male and female subjects, aged 18 years and older, suffering with occasional constipation
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Dosing arm 1
MiraLAX Sachet (17g) + Flavor blend (2g mannitol total)
|
Oral solution, 17g polyethylene glycol, one time
Oral, 2g, 4g, 6g, 8g and 10g mannitol, one time
|
Experimental: Dosing arm 2
MiraLAX Sachet (17g) + Flavor blend + additional 2g mannitol (4g mannitol total)
|
Oral solution, 17g polyethylene glycol, one time
Oral, 2g, 4g, 6g, 8g and 10g mannitol, one time
|
Experimental: Dosing arm 3
MiraLAX Sachet (17g) + Flavor blend + additional 4g mannitol (6g mannitol total)
|
Oral solution, 17g polyethylene glycol, one time
Oral, 2g, 4g, 6g, 8g and 10g mannitol, one time
|
Experimental: Dosing arm 4
MiraLAX Sachet (17g) + Flavor blend + additional 6g mannitol (8g mannitol total)
|
Oral solution, 17g polyethylene glycol, one time
Oral, 2g, 4g, 6g, 8g and 10g mannitol, one time
|
Experimental: Dosing arm 5
MiraLAX Sachet (17g) + Flavor blend + additional 8g mannitol (10g mannitol total)
|
Oral solution, 17g polyethylene glycol, one time
Oral, 2g, 4g, 6g, 8g and 10g mannitol, one time
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of Participants With the Opinion of the Products' Flavor
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Evaluated by 7-point scales: 1-extremely dislike, 2-moderately dislike, 3-dislike somewhat, 4-neither like nor dislike, 5-like somewhat, 6-moderately like, 7-extremely like
|
1 day
|
Number of Participants With the Opinion of the Amount of Flavor in the Products
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Evaluated by 7-point scales: -3 -extremely weak, -2 -somewhat weak, -1 -slightly weak, 0 -just the right level of flavor, 1 -slightly intense, 2 -moderately intense, 3 -much too intense
|
1 day
|
Number of Participants With the Opinion of the Products' Sweetness
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Evaluated by 7-point scales: -3 -no sweetness needed, -2 -needs to be moderately sweeter, -1 -needs to be a little sweeter, 0 -just the right level of sweetness, 1 -slightly too sweet, 2 -moderately sweet, 3 -much too sweet
|
1 day
|
Number of Participants With/Without Cooling Sensation in the Products.
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Whether or not subjects felt a cooling sensation (yes/no).
|
1 day
|
Number of Participants With Different Levels of Cooling Sensation of the Products
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Evaluated by 4-point scales: 1 -barely perceptible, 2 -slightly noticeable, 3 -moderately noticeable, 4 -extremely noticeable
|
1 day
|
Number of Participants With the Opinion of Aftertaste in the Products.
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Whether or not subjects experienced aftertaste (yes/no).
|
1 day
|
Number of Participants With Different Levels of Aftertaste of the Products
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Evaluated by 3-point scales: 1 -slightly noticeable, 2 -moderately noticeable, 3 -extremely noticeable
|
1 day
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of Participants With no Bowel Movement
Time Frame: 1 day
|
The number of subjects who did not report any bowel movement was evaluated.
|
1 day
|
Time to First Bowel Movement (In Hours)
Time Frame: 1 day
|
The mean and standard deviation of the time to first bowel movement in hours were evaluated.
|
1 day
|
Number of Participants for Gas Rating
Time Frame: 1 day
|
A gas rating score of 0 means that there was no gas experienced, while a score of 1 represents slight gas experienced, 2 represents moderate gas experienced and 3 represents severe gas experienced.
|
1 day
|
Number of Participants for Bloating Rating
Time Frame: 1 day
|
A score of zero represents no bloating, while a score of 1 represents slight bloating, 2 represents moderate bloating and 3 represents severe bloating.
|
1 day
|
Number of Participants for Abdominal Discomfort Rating
Time Frame: 1 day
|
A score of 0 represents no abdominal pain, 1 represents slight abdominal pain, 2 represents moderate abdominal pain and 3 represents severe abdominal pain.
|
1 day
|
Number of Participants With no Successful Bowel Movement
Time Frame: 1 day
|
The number of subjects who did not report the successful bowel movement was evaluated.
|
1 day
|
Time to First Successful Bowel Movement (In Hours)
Time Frame: 1 day
|
The mean and standard deviation of the time to first successful bowel movement in hours were evaluated.
|
1 day
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Including serious adverse events and adverse events.
|
1 day
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
February 13, 2013
Primary Completion (Actual)
March 19, 2013
Study Completion (Actual)
March 19, 2013
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 27, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 31, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
September 1, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
November 12, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 20, 2020
Last Verified
October 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 18160
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Constipation
-
usMIMA S.L.CompletedConstipation | Constipation Chronic Idiopathic | Constipation; NeurogenicSpain, United Kingdom
-
AbbVieIronwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.RecruitingFunctional Constipation (FC) | Chronic Idiopathic Constipation (CIC)United States, United Kingdom, Bulgaria, Netherlands
-
usMIMA S.L.University of York; County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation TrustNot yet recruitingConstipation | Constipation-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome | Constipation - Functional | Constipation Chronic Idiopathic | Constipation; Neurogenic
-
Institute of Medical Sciences and SUM HospitalNot yet recruitingFunctional Constipation | Constipation - Functional | Constipation Chronic Idiopathic | Fecal Impaction | Pediatric Functional ConstipationIndia
-
SK Life Science, Inc.CompletedChronic Constipation | Functional ConstipationUnited States
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownChronic Idiopathic Constipation | Functional ConstipationEgypt
-
ProgenaBiomeRecruitingConstipation | Constipation - Functional | Constipation Chronic Idiopathic | Constipation (Excl Faecal Impaction)United States
-
Pamukkale UniversityRecruiting
-
Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese MedicineLonghua Hospital; Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese MedicineRecruiting
-
Universidade Nova de LisboaCINTESIS - Center for Health Technology and Services ResearchRecruiting
Clinical Trials on Polyethylene glycol (MiraLAX, BAY81-8430)
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityUnknownColonoscopyUnited States
-
BayerCompleted
-
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical CenterNot yet recruitingConstipation | Surgical Procedure, Unspecified | Prolapse; FemaleUnited States
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDepartment of UrologyCompleted
-
Walter Reed National Military Medical CenterCompleted
-
University of ChicagoRecruiting
-
BayerCompletedA Study to Compare the Effect of Transipeg 2.95 g or Forlax Junior 4 g in Children With ConstipationConstipationNetherlands
-
Braintree LaboratoriesCompletedConstipationUnited States
-
Southern California Institute for Research and...UnknownBowel Preparation for ColonoscopyUnited States
-
Duke UniversityAmerican Urogynecologic SocietyCompletedPost Procedural ConstipationUnited States