Stress Coping Strategy on Perceived Stress Levels and Performance During a Simulated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

April 3, 2013 updated by: University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Impact of a Stress Coping Strategy on Perceived Stress Levels and Performance During a Simulated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study assessed the impact of a task-focusing strategy on perceived stress levels and performance during a simulated CPR scenario.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) causes significant stress, which may cause deficiencies in attention and increase distractibility. This may lead to misjudgements of priorities and delays in CPR performance, which may further increase mental stress (vicious cycle).

Aim: This study assessed the impact of a task-focusing strategy on perceived stress levels and performance during a simulated CPR scenario.

Methods: This is a prospective, randomized-controlled trial

Setting: Simulator-center of the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland.

Participants: A total of 124 volunteer medical students

Intervention: Randomization to receive a 10 minute instruction to cope with stress by loudly posing two task-focusing questions ("what is the patient's condition?", "what immediate action is needed?") when feeling overwhelmed by stress (intervention group) or a control group.

Outcome measures: The primary outcome is the perceived levels of stress and feeling overwhelmed (stress/overload); secondary outcomes were hands-on time, time to start CPR and number of leadership statements.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

124

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • BS
      • Basel, BS, Switzerland, 4055
        • University Hospital Basel, ICU

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 4th year medical students

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: intervention
Participants received a 10 minute instruction to cope with stress by loudly posing two task-focusing questions ("what is the patient's condition?", "what immediate action is needed?") when feeling overwhelmed by stress (intervention group)
Students in the intervention group received a 10 minute instruction to cope with stress. They were informed that an emergency situation is a stressful experience for health care workers and that perceived stress may interfere with their decision-making abilities and performance. Particularly, feeling overwhelmed by stress may cause cognitive impairment potentially leading to loss of concept how to deal with an emergency situation, which in turn further increases stress (vicious cycle). However, it is possible to overcome this situation by focusing on the basic conditions of the situation and the immediate actions that are needed. They were instructed that they should ask two task-focusing questions aloud ("what is the patient's condition?", "what immediate action is needed?") to overcome the negative consequences of feeling overwhelmed by stress.
No Intervention: Control
Students in the control group did not receive any further instructions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average level of stress/overload during the resuscitation period
Time Frame: In the first 120 seconds after the onset of the cardiac arrest
The primary outcome was the average level of stress/overload during the resuscitation period for the experimental and the control group.
In the first 120 seconds after the onset of the cardiac arrest

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
hands-on time
Time Frame: in the first 120 seconds after the onset of the cardiac arrest.
Medical performance measures: hands-on time defined as duration of uninterrupted chest compressions and defibrillation in the first 120 seconds after the onset of the cardiac arrest.
in the first 120 seconds after the onset of the cardiac arrest.
time elapsed until CPR was started
Time Frame: in the first 120 seconds after the onset of the cardiac arrest
the time elapsed until CPR was started, defined as the time to the first meaningful measure (either defibrillation, chest compression or ventilation) after the onset of the cardiac arrest; the team coordination measure
in the first 120 seconds after the onset of the cardiac arrest
leadership statements
Time Frame: in the first 120 seconds after the onset of the cardiac arrest
Number of leadership statements coded, using a predefined checklist containing the following categories based on previous research
in the first 120 seconds after the onset of the cardiac arrest

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sabina Hunziker, MD, MPH, University Hospital Basel, Basel 4031 Basel, Switzerland

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

April 8, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 8, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2013

Last Verified

April 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SH_SIP_2007

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitations

Clinical Trials on Stress coping

Subscribe