Subjective Comparison of Pre-Lens Tear Film Stability With Daily Disposable Contact Lenses

May 21, 2014 updated by: Alcon Research

Subjective Comparison of Pre-Lens Tear Film Stability With Daily Disposable Contact Lenses Using Ring Mire Projection

The purpose of this study was to compare three CE-marked daily disposable contact lenses for tear film stability as measured by pre-lens non-invasive keratograph break up time (PL NIK-BUT). Secondarily, contact lens surface wettability was assessed.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Each participant wore 3 brands of contact lenses in a randomized, cross-over fashion, with a washout phase of at least 1 night between brands.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 42 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Sign Informed Consent.
  • Adapted soft contact lens wearer.
  • Willing to wear contact lenses up to 12 hours and attend all study visits.
  • Vision correctable to 0.1 (logMAR) or better in each eye at distance with pre-study lenses at Visit 1.
  • Contact lens prescription within the power range specified in the protocol.
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any ocular infection, inflammation, abnormality, or active disease that would contraindicate contact lens wear.
  • Any use of systemic or ocular medications that would contraindicate contact lens wear.
  • Any ocular finding observed during the Visit 1 examination that would contraindicate contact lens wear.
  • Monocular (only 1 eye with functional vision) or fit with only 1 lens.
  • History of herpetic keratitis, ocular surgery, or irregular cornea.
  • Known pregnancy.
  • Unstable tear film with a NIK-BUT value below 13 seconds in either eye without lenses.
  • Participation in any clinical study within 30 days of Visit 1.
  • Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: DAILIES AquaComfort Plus
Nelfilcon A contact lenses worn first, followed by etafilcon A and omafilcon A in randomized order. Each product worn for 1 day, 12 hours.
Other Names:
  • DAILIES® AquaComfort Plus®
Active Comparator: 1-DAY ACUVUE MOIST
Etafilcon A contact lenses worn first, followed by nelfilcon A and omafilcon A in randomized order. Each product worn for 1 day, 12 hours.
Other Names:
  • 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST®
Active Comparator: Proclear 1 day
Omafilcon A contact lenses worn first, followed by etafilcon A and nelfilcon A in randomized order. Each product worn for 1 day, 12 hours.
Other Names:
  • Proclear® 1 day

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pre-Lens Non-Invasive Keratograph Break Up Time (PL NIK-BUT) at 8 Hours
Time Frame: Hour 8
The pre-lens tear film is the layer of tears located on top of the contact lens (i.e., between the eye lid and the contact lens). The time required for a dry spot to appear on the corneal surface after blinking is referred to as the tear film break-up time. Circular images were projected onto the contact lens using an Oculus Keratograph 5 and the tear film reflection was observed. PL NIK-BUT was recorded at the first sign of distortion. A longer tear film break-up time indicates a more stable tear film. One eye (right eye) contributed to the mean.
Hour 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Wettability Score
Time Frame: Hour 8
The investigator graded lens wettability by corneal region using a scale from 0 (fully wettable) to 3 (clearly visible ring distortions in more than 1/3 of ring reflection zone). The total wettability score per eye was calculated by averaging the grade of each of the 5 corneal regions (central, superior, nasal, inferior, and temporal). One eye (right eye) contributed to the mean.
Hour 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jessie Lemp, PhD, Alcon Research

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

April 24, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 20, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2014

Last Verified

May 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Refractive Error

Clinical Trials on Nelfilcon A contact lenses

3
Subscribe