Comparative Evaluation of Contact Lens Centering of DAILIES® AquaComfort Plus® Versus 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST® in Japan

October 24, 2014 updated by: Alcon Research

Comparative Evaluation of Contact Lens Centering of DAILIES® AquaComfort Plus® Versus 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST®

The purpose of this study is to evaluate lens centration and subjective impressions of DAILIES® AquaComfort Plus® (DACP) lenses compared to 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST® (1DAM) lenses in ball sports players.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 29 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Those who can understand the clinical study objectives and provide written informed consent. Legal representative or parental consent required if under age 20
  • Those who regularly wear soft contact lenses in both eyes for a minimum of 8 hours per day and 5 days per week
  • Those who play ball sports at least 1 day per week
  • Those who need vision correction because of myopia or mild myopic astigmatism, who are eligible for use of the study device, and who can attain a visual acuity of at least 1.0 with correction
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those who regularly wear the study device
  • Those who require ocular treatment with eye drops
  • Those who have a condition contraindicating soft contact lens wear, such as eye irritation
  • Those who have had ocular disorder or ocular surgery that may affect soft contact lens wear within 3 months before the start of the study
  • Those who are participating in another clinical study or research or have a plan of such participation during the present study
  • Women who are pregnant or intend to become pregnant during the study
  • Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: DACP, then 1DAM
Nelfilcon A contact lenses worn first, then etafilcon A contact lenses worn second. Each product worn bilaterally (in both eyes) for 1 week in a daily disposable mode.
Other Names:
  • DACP
  • DAILIES® AquaComfort® Plus
Other Names:
  • 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST®
Other: 1DAM, then DACP
Etafilcon A contact lenses worn first, then nelfilcon A contact lenses worn second. Each product worn bilaterally (in both eyes) for 1 week in a daily disposable mode.
Other Names:
  • DACP
  • DAILIES® AquaComfort® Plus
Other Names:
  • 1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Investigator-Rated Lens Centration
Time Frame: After 1 week of wear
Lens centration was assessed by the investigator using slit-lamp microscopy and rated on a 5-point scale, where 0=Optimal and 4=Severe decentration. Both eyes contributed to the mean.
After 1 week of wear

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Investigator-Rated Lens Fit
Time Frame: After 1 week of wear
Lens fit was assessed by the investigator and rated on a 5-point scale with -2=Unacceptable tight fit, -1=Acceptable tight fit, 0=Optimal, 1=Acceptable loose fit, and 2=Uacceptable loose fit. Both eyes contributed to the mean.
After 1 week of wear
Average Subjective Ratings Score (Lens Handling and Overall Vision)
Time Frame: After 1 week of wear
The participant rated the handling and overall vision of the contact lenses on a 10-point scale, where 10=Excellent and 1=Poor. Both eyes contributed to the mean.
After 1 week of wear
Average Subjective Ratings Score (Lens Wearing Conditions and Visual Performance During Ball Sports)
Time Frame: After 1 week of wear
The participant rated the lens wearing conditions and visual performance of the contact lenses during ball sports on a 10-point scale, where 10=Agree and 1=Disagree. "Overall Vision" was rated with 10=Excellent and 1=Poor. Both eyes contributed to the mean.
After 1 week of wear

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Lisa L. Zoota, MPH, CCRA, Alcon Research

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

April 3, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 29, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2014

Last Verified

October 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • M-13-050

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Refractive Error

Clinical Trials on Nelfilcon A contact lenses

Subscribe