Comparative Clinical Performance of 59% Hioxifilcon A Contact Lenses vs. Marketed Hydrogel Contact Lenses (DDHyd)

July 21, 2021 updated by: Vision Service Plan

Comparative Clinical Performance of 59% Hioxifilcon A Daily Disposable Contact Lenses vs. Marketed Daily Disposable Hydrogel Contact Lenses

The study will compare the short-term clinical performance and wearer and practitioner acceptability of a new-to-market spherical daily disposable (DD) hydrogel soft contact lens to a currently marketed spherical DD hydrogel soft contact lens.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This randomized clinical trial will compare the short-term clinical performance, and wearer acceptability of a new-to-market hioxifilcon A spherical daily DD contact lenses against marketed DD lenses in a short cross-over clinical trial.

The primary outcome variable for this study is overall subjective comfort.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30324
        • Ross Eyecare
    • Ohio
      • Westerville, Ohio, United States, 43081
        • Professional VisionCare
    • Tennessee
      • Brentwood, Tennessee, United States, 37027
        • Primary Eyecare Group

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 42 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Currently wearing spherical DD contact lenses at least 5 days/week
  • Vision correctable to 20/30 acuity in each eye with spherical DD contact lenses
  • No ocular or systemic disease that contra-indicates soft contact lens wear

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participating in another clinical trial
  • Vision not correctable to 20/30

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Test to Moist
1 week of Test DD contact lenses followed by cross over to 1 week of 1-DAY ACUVUE® Moist contact lenses.
Daily disposable contact lens wear for 1 week
Active Comparator: Moist to Test
1 week of 1-DAY ACUVUE® Moist contact lenses followed by cross over to 1 week of Test DD contact lenses.
Daily disposable contact lens wear for 1 week

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall subjective comfort
Time Frame: 1 week after contact lens wear
Subjective comfort rating on a scale of 0 (Painful) to 10 (Can't feel the lenses)
1 week after contact lens wear
Overall subjective comfort
Time Frame: 2 weeks after contact lens wear
Subjective comfort rating on a scale of 0 (Painful) to 10 (Can't feel the lenses)
2 weeks after contact lens wear

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
End of day subjective comfort
Time Frame: Visit 2 and 3 - Approximately 1 and 2 weeks, respectively
Subjective comfort rating on a scale of 0 (Painful) to 10 (Can't feel the lenses)
Visit 2 and 3 - Approximately 1 and 2 weeks, respectively
Subjective vision
Time Frame: Visit 2 and 3 - Approximately 1 and 2 weeks, respectively
Subjective vision rating on a scale of 0 (Not at all sharp/clear) to 10 (Sharp/Clear)
Visit 2 and 3 - Approximately 1 and 2 weeks, respectively
Overall subjective lens preference
Time Frame: Visit 3 - After approximately 2 weeks of contact lens wear
Forced choice subjective preference for either lens type (1-Day ACUVUE® MOIST or Test DD contact lens) or no preference. i.e. three options presented and participant selects one option.
Visit 3 - After approximately 2 weeks of contact lens wear

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 11, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 18, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 18, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 14, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 23, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Refractive Error - Myopia Bilateral

Clinical Trials on Hioxifilcon A standard hydrogel contact lens with Hyaluronic Acid (HA)

3
Subscribe