Axis Length and Its Relationship With Refractive Error in Chinese University Students

December 8, 2020 updated by: Wang Hongxia

Shanghai Guanghua Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital, Guanghua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China

To investigate the relationship between axis length (AL) and refractive error. eyes of low hyperopia to emmetropia subjects, comprising eyes with moderate to high myopia (-11.00D ≤ SE ≤ -4.00D) were analyzed in this cross-sectional study. Cycloplegic refractive error was measured with the autorefractor, AL was measured with the IOL master. Association between AL and refractive error were evaluated by linear regression analysis. The mean of AL and its correlation with SE, sex, and age were evaluated.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

To investigate the relationship between axis length (AL) and refractive error (RE). 894 eyes with low hyperopia to emmetropia (-0.50D ≤ spherical equivalent (SE) ≤ +2.00D), comprising 1007 eyes with moderate to high myopia (-11.00D ≤ SE ≤ -4.00D) were analyzed in this study. Cycloplegic RE was measured with the autorefractor, AL was measured with the IOL master. Association between AL and refractive error were evaluated by linear regression analysis. The mean of AL and its correlation with SE, sex, and age were evaluated.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1901

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200052
        • Shanghai Guanghua Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years to 26 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The subject recruited for the study were 1935 students

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

with moderate to high myopia (SE ≤ -4.00D) without myopia (-0.50D ≤ spherical power ≤ +2.00D) no concurrent eye disease best corrected visual acuity is 1.0

Exclusion Criteria:

significant systemic illnesses congenital myopia, media opacity uveitis glaucoma intraocular surgery refractive surgery neurologic diseases retinal disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
axis length
1007 healthy students with moderate to high myopia (SE ≤ -4.00D) and 894 without myopia (-0.50D ≤ spherical power ≤ +2.00D) were enrolled.
visual acuity, IOL master biometry, the anterior segment with slit lamp, dilated fundus examination and refraction.
gender
male were 54.29% (N=1032), and female were 45.71% (N=869)
visual acuity, IOL master biometry, the anterior segment with slit lamp, dilated fundus examination and refraction.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Axis length
Time Frame: from baseline at 6 months
Axis length change from baseline at 6 months
from baseline at 6 months
Refractive Error
Time Frame: from baseline at 6 months
Refractive Error change from baseline at 6 months
from baseline at 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Hongxia Wang, director, Shanghai Guanghua Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 21, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

August 11, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 14, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020-K-106

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Refractive Error - Myopia Axial

Clinical Trials on myopia or not myopia

3
Subscribe