- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01852058
A Long-Term Extension Study of OnabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) for Urinary Incontinence Due to Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity
April 22, 2020 updated by: Allergan
Long-term Extension Study of BOTOX® in the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence Due to Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity in Patients 5 to 17 Years of Age
This study will evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA (botulinum toxin Type A; BOTOX®) for the treatment of urinary incontinence due to neurogenic detrusor overactivity in participants who successfully completed Study 191622-120 (NCT01852045).
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
95
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Antwerpen, Belgium, 2650
- UZ Antwerpen
-
Gent, Belgium, 9000
- Ghent University Hospital
-
Leuven, Belgium, 3000
- UZ Leuven
-
-
-
-
Ontario
-
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S 4K1
- McMaster University Medical Centre
-
-
Quebec
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3T 1C5
- CHU Sainte Justine
-
-
-
-
-
Hradec Kralove, Czechia, 50005
- Fakultni nemocnice Hradec Kralove
-
Olomouc, Czechia, 775 20
- Fakultni nemocnice Olomouc
-
-
-
-
-
Bordeaux, France, 33076
- Hopital Pellegrin - Enfants
-
Limoges, France, 87000
- CHU de Limoges - Hôpital Mère et l'Enfant
-
Paris, France, 75015
- Hopital Necker Enfants-malades
-
-
-
-
-
Naples, Italy, 80138
- Seconda Universita di Napoli
-
Rome, Italy, 00165
- Bambin Gesù- Ospedale Pediatrico
-
-
-
-
-
Gdansk, Poland, 80-803
- Copernicus Podmiot Leczniczy Sp. z o. o. Kliniczny Oddział Chirurgii i Urologii Dzieci i Młodzieży GUMed
-
Poznań, Poland, 61-512
- Specjalistyczny Gabinet Lekarski
-
Wroclaw, Poland, 50-369
- Medical University of WROCLAW
-
-
-
-
-
Ankara, Turkey, 6100
- University of Ankara
-
-
-
-
Alabama
-
Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Division of Urology Research Office
-
-
California
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
-
Orange, California, United States, 92868
- Children's Hospital of Orange County
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
- Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46032
- Riley Hospital for Children
-
-
Michigan
-
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States, 48073
- William Beaumont Hospital Research Institute
-
-
Missouri
-
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
- St. Louis Children's Hospital Division of Urology
-
-
New York
-
Tarrytown, New York, United States, 10591
- Pediatric Urology Associates, PC
-
-
North Carolina
-
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28207
- McKay Urology Carolinas Medical Center
-
Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
- Duke University
-
-
Ohio
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Cincinnati Center for Clinical Research and Outpatient Clinic
-
-
Oklahoma
-
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104
- Oklahoma Children's Hospital
-
-
South Carolina
-
Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
- Medical University of South Carolina
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226
- Children's Hospital of Wisconsin Department of Pediatric Urology
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
5 years to 17 years (Child)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Successfully completed participation in Study 191622-120
- Aged ≥ 5 years to ≤ 17 years at the time of entry into Study 191622-120
- Regularly using clean intermittent catheterization to empty the bladder
Exclusion Criteria:
- Myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
- Current or planned use of a baclofen pump
- Current or planned use of an electrostimulation/neuromodulation device for urinary incontinence
- Use of an indwelling catheter for urinary incontinence instead of using clean intermittent catheterization to empty the bladder
- Previous or current use of botulinum toxin therapy of any serotype for any urological condition, or treatment with botulinum toxin of any serotype for any other condition since entering study 191622-120
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 U
Following treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA (botulinum toxin Type A) 50 U (not to exceed 6 U/kg) intramuscular injection into the detrusor wall in study 120, participants were eligible for retreatments in this study as needed with a minimum 12-week interval between doses for a maximum of 3 retreatments.
Blinded dose increases (one level) were allowed based on clinical response from cycle to cycle (not to exceed 6 U/kg).
|
OnabotulinumtoxinA injected into the detrusor wall.
Treatments were administered as needed with a minimum of a 12-week interval between doses.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U
Following treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA (botulinum toxin Type A) 100 U (not to exceed 6 U/kg) intramuscular injection into the detrusor wall in study 120, participants were eligible for retreatments in this study as needed with a minimum 12-week interval between doses for a maximum of 3 retreatments.
Blinded dose increases (one level) were allowed based on clinical response from cycle to cycle (not to exceed 6 U/kg).
|
OnabotulinumtoxinA injected into the detrusor wall.
Treatments were administered as needed with a minimum of a 12-week interval between doses.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: OnabotulinumtoxinA 200 U
Following treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA (botulinum toxin Type A) 200 U (not to exceed 6 U/kg) intramuscular injection into the detrusor wall in study 120, participants were eligible for retreatments in this study as needed with a minimum 12-week interval between doses for a maximum of 3 retreatments.
Blinded dose increases (one level) were allowed based on clinical response from cycle to cycle (not to exceed 6 U/kg).
|
OnabotulinumtoxinA injected into the detrusor wall.
Treatments were administered as needed with a minimum of a 12-week interval between doses.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Normalized Daytime Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 1
Time Frame: Study Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1
|
Urinary incontinence was defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded by the participant in a bladder diary during 2 consecutive days in the week prior to the study visit (normalized to a 12 hour daytime period).
Daytime is defined as the time between waking up to start the day and going to bed to sleep for the night.
The number of daily daytime incontinence episodes were averaged during the 2-day period.
A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
|
Study Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1
|
|
Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Normalized Daytime Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 2
Time Frame: Study Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 2
|
Urinary incontinence was defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded by the participant in a bladder diary during 2 consecutive days in the week prior to the study visit (normalized to a 12 hour daytime period).
Daytime is defined as the time between waking up to start the day and going to bed to sleep for the night.
The number of daily daytime incontinence episodes were averaged during the 2-day period.
A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
|
Study Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 2
|
|
Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Normalized Daytime Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 3
Time Frame: Study Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 3
|
Urinary incontinence was defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded by the participant in a bladder diary during 2 consecutive days in the week prior to the study visit (normalized to a 12 hour daytime period).
Daytime is defined as the time between waking up to start the day and going to bed to sleep for the night.
The number of daily daytime incontinence episodes were averaged during the 2-day period.
A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
|
Study Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 3
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (STEAEs)
Time Frame: First injection on Day 1 in Study 120 through completion of Study 121 (Up to 108 weeks)
|
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.
An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to medicinal (investigational) product.
A serious adverse event (SAE) is any AE that resulted in death, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, life threatening, a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or an important medical event.
A TEAE or STEAE is defined as any new AE or worsening of an existing condition after initiation of treatment.
Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycles.
|
First injection on Day 1 in Study 120 through completion of Study 121 (Up to 108 weeks)
|
|
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 1
Time Frame: Study Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1
|
Urinary incontinence was defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded by the participant in a bladder diary during 2 consecutive days in the week prior to the study visit (normalized to a 12 hour daytime period).
Daytime is defined as the time between waking up to start the day and going to bed to sleep for the night.
The number of daily incontinence episodes were averaged during the 2-day period.
Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
|
Study Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1
|
|
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 2
Time Frame: Study Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 2
|
Urinary incontinence was defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded by the participant in a bladder diary during 2 consecutive days in the week prior to the study visit (normalized to a 12 hour daytime period).
Daytime is defined as the time between waking up to start the day and going to bed to sleep for the night.
The number of daily incontinence episodes were averaged during the 2-day period.
Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
|
Study Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 2
|
|
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, ≥ 90%, and ≥ 100% Reduction From Baseline in the Number of Normalized Daytime Urinary Incontinence Episodes in Treatment Cycle 3
Time Frame: Study Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 3
|
Urinary incontinence was defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded by the participant in a bladder diary during 2 consecutive days in the week prior to the study visit (normalized to a 12 hour daytime period).
Daytime is defined as the time between waking up to start the day and going to bed to sleep for the night.
The number of daily incontinence episodes were averaged during the 2-day period.
Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
|
Study Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 3
|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Urine Volume at First Morning Catheterization in Treatment Cycle 1
Time Frame: Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1
|
The change in urine volume at first morning catherization was recorded by the participant in a bladder diary in the 2 consecutive days during the week prior to the study visit.
The daily values were averaged during the 2-day period.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
|
Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Urine Volume at First Morning Catheterization in Treatment Cycle 2
Time Frame: Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 2
|
The change in urine volume at first morning catherization was recorded by the participant in a bladder diary in the 2 consecutive days during the week prior to the study visit.
The daily values were averaged during the 2-day period.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
|
Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 2
|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Urine Volume at First Morning Catheterization in Treatment Cycle 3
Time Frame: Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 3
|
The change in urine volume at first morning catherization was recorded by the participant in a bladder diary in the 2 consecutive days during the week prior to the study visit.
The daily values were averaged during the 2-day period.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
|
Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) to 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 3
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 1
Time Frame: Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) and 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1
|
Urinary incontinence was defined as involuntary loss of urine.
Night time urinary incontinence was recorded by the participant on the bladder diary as a presence or absence of urinary leakage upon waking, for 2 consecutive days in the week prior to the week 6 visit.
Night time was defined as the time between going to bed to sleep for the night and waking up to start the day.
The percentage of participants with night time urinary incontinence is presented in categories 0, 1, and 2 nights.
Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
|
Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) and 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 2
Time Frame: Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) and 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 2
|
Urinary incontinence was defined as involuntary loss of urine.
Night time urinary incontinence was recorded by the participant on the bladder diary as a presence or absence of urinary leakage upon waking, for 2 consecutive days in the week prior to the week 6 visit.
Night time was defined as the time between going to bed to sleep for the night and waking up to start the day.
The percentage of participants with night time urinary incontinence is presented in categories 0, 1, and 2 nights.
Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
|
Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) and 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 2
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Night Time Urinary Incontinence in Treatment Cycle 3
Time Frame: Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) and 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 3
|
Urinary incontinence was defined as involuntary loss of urine.
Night time urinary incontinence was recorded by the participant on the bladder diary as a presence or absence of urinary leakage upon waking, for 2 consecutive days in the week prior to the week 6 visit.
Night time was defined as the time between going to bed to sleep for the night and waking up to start the day.
The percentage of participants with night time urinary incontinence is presented in categories 0, 1, and 2 nights.
Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
|
Baseline (Prior to Day 1 in Study 120) and 2 consecutive days in the week prior to Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 3
|
|
Average Time to Participant's Request for Retreatment
Time Frame: First injection on Day 1 in Study 120 through to the date of completion of Study 121 (Up to 108 weeks)
|
Time to request for re-treatment is the time in weeks between last injection and request for next injection, regardless of fulfillment of the re-treatment criteria.
Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received across entire study.
Data is reported for only participants that had at least one request for retreatment while on a specified BOTOX dose.
|
First injection on Day 1 in Study 120 through to the date of completion of Study 121 (Up to 108 weeks)
|
|
Average Time to Participant's Qualification for Retreatment
Time Frame: First injection on Day 1 in Study 120 through to the date of completion of Study 121 (Up to 108 weeks)
|
The criteria for qualification of retreatment included 1) Participant/parent/caregiver requests retreatment; 2) Participant has a total of at least 2 daytime urinary incontinence episodes over the 2-day bladder diary collection period; 3) At least 12 weeks has elapsed since treatment 1 and 4) Participant has not experienced a serious treatment-related adverse event at any time.
Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received across entire study.
Data is reported for only participants that had at least one request for retreatment while on a specified BOTOX dose.
|
First injection on Day 1 in Study 120 through to the date of completion of Study 121 (Up to 108 weeks)
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Modified Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) in Treatment Cycle 1
Time Frame: Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1
|
The Modified TBS is a single-item scale which assesses the participant's condition (urinary problems, urinary incontinence) on a 4-point scale where 1 = greatly improved; 2 = improved; 3 = not changed; and 4 = worsened.
A participant was considered to have a positive treatment response if they responded to the TBS question as either "greatly improved" or "improved".
Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
|
Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 1
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Modified Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) in Treatment Cycle 2
Time Frame: Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 2
|
The Modified TBS is a single-item scale which assesses the participant's condition (urinary problems, urinary incontinence) on a 4-point scale where 1 = greatly improved; 2 = improved; 3 = not changed; and 4 = worsened.
A participant was considered to have a positive treatment response if they responded to the TBS question as either "greatly improved" or "improved".
Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
|
Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 2
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Positive Response on Modified Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) in Treatment Cycle 3
Time Frame: Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 3
|
The Modified TBS is a single-item scale which assesses the participant's condition (urinary problems, urinary incontinence) on a 4-point scale where 1 = greatly improved; 2 = improved; 3 = not changed; and 4 = worsened.
A participant was considered to have a positive treatment response if they responded to the TBS question as either "greatly improved" or "improved".
Data are summarized under the respective treatments that participants received in the corresponding treatment cycle.
|
Week 6 in Treatment Cycle 3
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Brenda Jenkins, Allergan
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 11, 2014
Primary Completion (Actual)
November 22, 2018
Study Completion (Actual)
October 3, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 9, 2013
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 9, 2013
First Posted (Estimate)
May 13, 2013
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 12, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 22, 2020
Last Verified
April 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Behavioral Symptoms
- Mental Disorders
- Urologic Diseases
- Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
- Urological Manifestations
- Urination Disorders
- Elimination Disorders
- Urinary Incontinence
- Enuresis
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Cholinergic Agents
- Membrane Transport Modulators
- Acetylcholine Release Inhibitors
- Neuromuscular Agents
- Botulinum Toxins
- Botulinum Toxins, Type A
- abobotulinumtoxinA
Other Study ID Numbers
- 191622-121
- 2012-004898-30 (EudraCT Number)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Urinary Incontinence
-
Juna d.o.o.CompletedFemale Stress Urinary Incontinence | Mixed Incontinence, Urge and Stress
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK); Stanford...CompletedUrinary Incontinence, Stress | Urge Incontinence | Urinary Stress Incontinence | Stress Incontinence, Urinary | Stress Incontinence | Stress Incontinence, Female | Urgency UrinaryUnited States
-
Ludwig-Maximilians - University of MunichUnknownIncontinence, Overactive Bladder, Stress Urinary IncontinenceGermany
-
San Diego Sexual MedicineRecruitingStress Urinary Incontinence | Urge IncontinenceUnited States
-
Copenhagen University Hospital at HerlevZealand University HospitalTerminatedStress Urinary Incontinence | Urge Urinary IncontinenceDenmark
-
Far Eastern Memorial HospitalRecruitingWomen With Stress Urinary IncontinenceTaiwan
-
ScitonCompletedUrinary Incontinence | Stress Urinary Incontinence | Urge IncontinenceUnited States
-
Université de SherbrookeRecruitingUrinary Incontinence | Urinary Stress Incontinence | Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence | Stress Incontinence, MaleCanada
-
University of ZurichCompletedStress Urinary Incontinence | Urge Urinary Incontinence
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationCompletedUrinary Stress Incontinence (SI)Israel
Clinical Trials on OnabotulinumtoxinA
-
AllerganCompletedGlabellar LinesUnited States
-
Association of Migraine DisordersUniversity OtolaryngologyRecruitingPain From onabotulinumtoxinA InjectionsUnited States
-
AllerganCompletedGlabellar Lines | Crow's Feet Lines | Facial RhytidesGermany, Canada, United States, France
-
AllerganCompletedGlabellar Lines | Crow's Feet Lines | Facial RhytidesGermany, Canada, United States, France
-
AllerganCompleted
-
Northwell HealthWithdrawn
-
Henry Ford Health SystemActive, not recruitingGlabellar Frown LinesUnited States
-
Buddhist Tzu Chi General HospitalCompleted
-
Seoul National University HospitalIpsen; Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul, KoreaCompletedCervical DystoniaKorea, Republic of
-
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; University of Alabama at Birmingham and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingOveractive Bladder | Urinary Incontinence in Old Age | Urgency Urinary IncontinenceUnited States