Neonatal Suspected Sepsis Treated With Cefazolin or Vancomycin

May 31, 2013 updated by: Jose Ceriani Cernadas M.D., Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires

Clinical Outcome of Newborn Infants With Suspected Nosocomial Coagulase-negative Staphylococcal Sepsis Treated With Cefazolin or Vancomycin. A Non-inferiority, Randomized, Controlled Trial

The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of empiric treatment with cefazolin versus to vancomycin in newborn infants with presumptive clinical signs of hospital acquired bacterial sepsis probably caused by Coagulase-negative staphylococcus.

The investigators hypothesized that newborn infants with the presumptive diagnosis of nosocomial sepsis who received cefazolin as empiric treatment would have a clinical outcome not inferior to that of those treated with vancomycin.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

109

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Capital
      • Buenos Aires, Capital, Argentina, 1181
        • Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 days to 4 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newborn infants older than three days of life with suspected bacterial sepsis and according to attending physicians, with an indication for initial treatment with vancomycin and at least one blood culture taken prior to receiving the antimicrobial treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • previous treatment with vancomycin during the week before,
  • infants referred from other hospitals and, upon admission, were being treated with antibiotics.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cefazolin group
Initial empirical treatment with cefazolin and amikacin
Active Comparator: Vancomycin
Initial empirical treatment with vancomycin and amikacin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical outcome of infants
Time Frame: Seven to ten days after starting antibiotics

Examination of each newborn infant by two of the investigators independently to establish whether the clinical outcome was adequate or inadequate. In order to achieve greater objectivity, the clinical examination was performed using the following criteria:

Adequate: when the newborn infant had normal clinical parameters, a good general condition, appropriate tolerance to gastric feeding, normal temperature , negative blood and CSF cultures, and normalized results for the lab tests performed at the onset of the treatment.

Inadequate: when one or more of the following were present: clinical course with persistence of any of the signs of sepsis, positive blood or CSF cultures after 72 hours from the onset of treatment, persistence of abnormal lab tests, and death by sepsis.

Seven to ten days after starting antibiotics

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of infants initially assigned to cefazolin group that were switched to vancomycin.
Time Frame: Within 72 hours of starting treatment
Patients with an inadequate 72 hour response to cefazolin were crossed over to receive vancomycin. The adjudication of response at 72 hours was delineated in a well-defined algorithm. To minimize bias, the final decision to switch treatments, initiated by the pediatrician in charge, required secondary review and agreement of another participating investigator as well as the attending NICU physician.
Within 72 hours of starting treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jose M Cernadas, M.D., Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 29, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

June 3, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 3, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2013

Last Verified

May 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nosocomial Neonatal Sepsis

Clinical Trials on Vancomycin

Subscribe