Treating Cancer-Related Fatigue Through Systematic Light Exposure

April 7, 2017 updated by: Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Cancer related fatigue (CRF) - a persistent sense of exhaustion related to cancer or cancer treatment - can severely interfere with activities of daily living, and has even been reported to be a factor in patient requests for hastened death. CRF can represent a serious clinical problem years after all treatment has ended. There is currently no effective treatment for CRF. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether systematic exposure to light (from a commercially available Litebook) reduces CRF or other symptoms.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cancer related fatigue (CRF) - a persistent sense of exhaustion related to cancer or cancer treatment - can severely interfere with activities of daily living, and has even been reported to be a factor in patient requests for hastened death. CRF can represent a serious clinical problem years after all treatment has ended. In our research with cancer survivors 1 to 3 years after completion of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), 40% of those we interviewed reported that CRF was a major obstacle to the resumption of usual activities. Despite its impact on quality of life, CRF is under-reported, under-diagnosed, and under-treated.

A variety of pharmacologic agents have been studied to treat CRF, but there is insufficient evidence to recommend their use. The most promising non-pharmacologic interventions -- exercise and cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT) -- have shown equally modest effects. The proposed study focuses on a promising new intervention for CRF, using systematic light exposure (SLE), consisting of a daily 30-minute exposure to as much as 10,000 lux of light from a commercially available light box. Study collaborator, Ancoli-Israel and her colleagues have successfully piloted this line of research with breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

The goal of this study will be to assess the effect of SLE on long-term HSCT and breast cancer survivors, and to determine the feasibility and acceptability of SLE as an intervention for CRF. The approach will be informed by the procedures that Ancoli-Israel and her colleagues developed for their research on SLE treatment for breast cancer chemotherapy, as well as by Redd's studies of CBT to treat adjustment disorders in survivors of HSCT. The study arms will test the efficacy of two different types of light treatment, bright white light and dim red light. Outcomes will be assessed through standardized measures of CRF, sleep quality, and quality of life.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Jersey
      • Hackensack, New Jersey, United States, 07601
        • Hackensack University Medical Center
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • ICAHN School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients:

  • With a history of HSCT as treatment for hematological malignancies and related diseases and who are up to 3.5 years post-transplant; OR
  • Who are up to three and a half years post completion of chemotherapy OR chemotherapy and radiation for breast cancer with a curative intent;

AND:

  • With a score equal to or less than 33 on the FACIT-Fatigue scale (see below) and no pre-existing anemia (Hb<10gm/dl); or a score equal to or greater than 43 on the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire
  • Who are currently over age 18 and at least age 16 at the time of HSCT or time of breast cancer treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under age 18;
  • Pregnancy;
  • Confounding underlying medical illnesses;
  • History of mania (which is a contra-indication for light treatment) or current clinical depression;
  • And any other physical or psychological impairments including a sleep disorder diagnosis which would limit participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Bright white light
using systematic light exposure (SLE), consisting of a daily 30-minute exposure to as much as 10,000 lux of light from a commercially available light box
Other Names:
  • Light Box
  • Litebook
Active Comparator: Dim red light
using systematic light exposure (SLE), consisting of a daily 30-minute exposure to as much as 10,000 lux of light from a commercially available light box
Other Names:
  • Light Box
  • Litebook

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
FACIT-Fatigue Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
A list of statements that patients with cancer have said about their fatigue will be read. Subjects will mark on a 5-point scale how often they have felt each statement over the last 7 days. Measured at baseline, second week of light box use, fourth (last) week of light box use, three weeks post completion of light box use
Baseline
FACIT-Fatigue Scale
Time Frame: at 4 weeks
A list of statements that patients with cancer have said about their fatigue will be read. Subjects will mark on a 5-point scale how often they have felt each statement over the last 7 days.
at 4 weeks
FACIT-Fatigue Scale
Time Frame: at 3 months follow up
A list of statements that patients with cancer have said about their fatigue will be read. Subjects will mark on a 5-point scale how often they have felt each statement over the last 7 days.
at 3 months follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time Frame: Baseline
The validity of the instrument is based on its ability to discriminate patients (those having either sleep problems and/or depressive symptoms) from controls (healthy participants without sleep complaints). Baseline, second week of light box use, fourth (last) week of light box use, three weeks post completion of light box use
Baseline
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time Frame: at 4 weeks
The validity of the instrument is based on its ability to discriminate patients (those having either sleep problems and/or depressive symptoms) from controls (healthy participants without sleep complaints).
at 4 weeks
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time Frame: at 3 months follow up
The validity of the instrument is based on its ability to discriminate patients (those having either sleep problems and/or depressive symptoms) from controls (healthy participants without sleep complaints.
at 3 months follow up
SF-36 Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
Quality of life will be assessed using the SF-36 scale. The SF-36 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey consisting of 36 questions.
Baseline
SF-36 Scale
Time Frame: at 4 weeks
Quality of life will be assessed using the SF-36 scale. The SF-36 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey consisting of 36 questions.
at 4 weeks
SF-36 Scale
Time Frame: at 3 months follow up
Quality of life will be assessed using the SF-36 scale. The SF-36 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey consisting of 36 questions.
at 3 months follow up
CNS-Vital Signs
Time Frame: Baseline
Objective cognitive function will be assessed using CNS-Vital Signs, a reliable and valid computer-administered cognitive assessment battery that consists of 7 cognitive tests.
Baseline
CNS-Vital Signs
Time Frame: at 4 weeks
Objective cognitive function will be assessed using CNS-Vital Signs, a reliable and valid computer-administered cognitive assessment battery that consists of 7 cognitive tests.
at 4 weeks
CNS-Vital Signs
Time Frame: at 3 months follow up
Objective cognitive function will be assessed using CNS-Vital Signs, a reliable and valid computer-administered cognitive assessment battery that consists of 7 cognitive tests.
at 3 months follow up
The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline
A 25-item self-report measure of cognitive difficulties in everyday life using a 5-point Likert scale.
Baseline
The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire
Time Frame: at 4 weeks
A 25-item self-report measure of cognitive difficulties in everyday life using a 5-point Likert scale.
at 4 weeks
The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire
Time Frame: at 3 months follow up
A 25-item self-report measure of cognitive difficulties in everyday life using a 5-point Likert scale.
at 3 months follow up
Brief Symptom Inventory-18
Time Frame: Baseline
Used to assess psychological distress. A list of health problems and complaints that people sometimes experience are listed.
Baseline
Brief Symptom Inventory-18
Time Frame: at 4 weeks
Used to assess psychological distress. A list of health problems and complaints that people sometimes experience are listed.
at 4 weeks
Brief Symptom Inventory-18
Time Frame: at 3 months follow up
Used to assess psychological distress. A list of health problems and complaints that people sometimes experience are listed.
at 3 months follow up
Actiwatch Spectrum
Time Frame: Baseline
Sleep/wake activity is measured using an actigraph which records physical movement and detects light. The Actiwatch is worn for 72 consecutive hours.
Baseline
Actiwatch Spectrum
Time Frame: at 4 weeks
Sleep/wake activity is measured using an actigraph which records physical movement and detects light. The Actiwatch is worn for 72 consecutive hours.
at 4 weeks
Actiwatch Spectrum
Time Frame: at 3 months follow up
Sleep/wake activity is measured using an actigraph which records physical movement and detects light. The Actiwatch is worn for 72 consecutive hours.
at 3 months follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: William H Redd, PhD, ICAHN School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 6, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

June 10, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GCO 10-0864
  • 5R21CA158954 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • HSM#11-01032

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Bright white light

Subscribe