Exercise in Advanced Stage Lung Cancer Patients (EXHALE)

September 5, 2018 updated by: Morten Quist, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

"EXHALE" A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing the Effects of a 12 Week Supervised Exercise Intervention Versus Usual Care for Advanced Stage Lung Cancer Patients.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of twelve weeks of a physical and psycho-social program consisting of: supervised, structured exercise training in a group of advanced lung cancer patients (cardio and strength training, relaxation training) twice weekly. Primary outcome is (VO2peak). The hypotheses are that patients who undergo this intervention will increase maximal oxygen uptake (VO2peak), strength (1RM), functional capacity (6MWD) and quality of life (HRQOL) and reduce the level of anxiety and depression compared to those who do not.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Control - usual care The patients randomized to the control group received no training but are offered the chance to participate in the supervised training after they have completed their antineoplastic treatment, at least after twelve weeks. Patients in early 2nd line treatment ("switch maintenance") will be offered training after 12 weeks, although they have not completed chemotherapy.

Intervention The supervised training was carried out in groups of 12-16 patients and each session had a duration of 1.5 hours, was administered twice weekly and was supervised by a research physiotherapist. The training comprised warm up exercises, strength and fitness training as well as stretching. Warm up exercises consisted of 10 minutes of light, stationery cycling, adjusted to 60-90% of the patient's maximum HR. Strength training was carried out using 6 machines (Technogym: Leg press, chest press, lateral machine, leg extension, abdominal crunch, and lower back). The practical aim of strength training was to complete 3 series of 5-8 sets, with 70-90% of 1RM. The exercises were specifically selected to involve the largest possible number of muscle groups in the least number of exercises. To ensure progression in strength training, each patient was instructed in carrying out the 1RM test using each of the above-mentioned strength training machines once every second week, after which their program would be adjusted. Cardiovascular training was carried out as interval training on stationery bikes. Intensity was equivalent to 85-95% of each patient's maximum HR and lasted approximately 10-15 minutes. After the training session, 5-10 minutes were dedicated to stretching the large muscle groups in order to increase agility. Following each training session, progressive relaxation of 15-20 minutes was performed.

Pre training screening Each Patient was screened by a clinical nurse specialist prior to participating in each physical training session and before the physiological tests (35). If one of the following criteria were met, the patient was prohibited from exercising/being tested on that day: diastolic blood pressure <45 or >95, heart rate (HR) at rest >115/min, temperature > 38 0C, respiratory rate at rest >30/min, infection requiring treatment, fresh bleeding, total leucocyte count <1.0 109/L or platelets <50 109/L. Physical tests and HRQOL evaluation were performed at baseline and after six weeks of training.

Statistical analysis Sample size The applied calculations are performed on 55 patients on the basis of VO2peak; through six weeks of training 55 patients achieved an increase of 0.85 ml / kg / min in VO2peak (SD = 2,48). It is assumed that the control group in the current study will have a reduction of 0.5 ml / kg / min for VO2peak (SD = 2.48). Assumptions for calculation of patient numbers are as follows: Type 1 error 0.05, type 2 error 0.20, and success level 1.35, SD 2.48. This leads to a total number of patients of 108 (54 in each arm). This study expects a drop-out rate of 50% and therefore another 108 patients must be included, which gives a sample size of 216 patients.

Data entry is carried out in the Open Clinica and analysis will be performed using the computer program SAS. As regards the choice of the statistical tests applied to data in which there will be no continuous differences, that will be analyzed by paired t-test or a corresponding non-parametric test, as categorical data are analyzed using the Pearson χ2 tests. Other data (e.g., from questionnaires) are analyzed using logistic regression and chi square or Mantel Haenzel test. Significance level is set at 0.05.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

219

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
        • University Hospital of Copenhagen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Non small cell lung cancer stage IIIb-IV
  • Small cell lung cancer Extensiv disease
  • Patients >18 years
  • WHO performance status 0-2
  • undergoing chemotherapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • brain or bone metastases;
  • prolonged bone marrow suppression
  • anti-coagulant treatment
  • symptomatic heart disease
  • congestive heart failure
  • arrhythmia
  • myocardial infarction diagnosed within the last three months
  • inability to provide informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Control - usual care
The patients randomized to the control group received no training but are offered the chance to participate in the supervised training after they have completed their antineoplastic treatment, at least after twelve weeks. Patients in early 2nd line treatment ("switch maintenance") will be offered training after 12 weeks, although they have not completed chemotherapy.
Other: Exercise + usual care
The supervised exercise training is carried out in groups of 12-16 patients and each session has a duration of 1.5 hours. The training comprised warm up exercises, strength and fitness training as well as stretching. Warm up exercises consisted of 10 minutes of light, stationery cycling, adjusted to 60-90% of the patient's maximum HR. The practical aim of strength training was to complete 3 series of 5-8 sets, with 70-90% of 1RM. Cardiovascular training was carried out as interval training on stationery bikes. Intensity was equivalent to 85-95% of each patient's maximum HR and lasted approximately 10-15 minutes. After the training session, 5-10 minutes were dedicated to stretching the large muscle groups in order to increase agility. Following each training session, progressive relaxation of 15-20 minutes was performed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VO2peak
Time Frame: baseline and after 12 weeks
The primary endpoint will be VO2 peak, as assessed with an aerobic capacity (VO2 peak) incremental C-PET on a cycle ergometer (Monark, ergomedic 839E).The C-PET is carried out by a physiotherapist who is blinded to the patient's study group allocation. The test consists of a warm-up phase 2-4 minutes of cycling at a submaximal load (10-50 watts). After the warm-up period the load increases after a short break (<2 minutes) by 5-10 watts every minute, until exhaustion or a possible symptom limitation (e.g. dizziness, sudden pain, vomiting sensation). Expired gases will be analyzed continuously by a metabolic breath-by-breath analysis and calculated as an average over 15 seconds using the Oxycon Pro, Jaeger measurement system. During the C-PET, oxyhemoglobin saturation and heart rate will be continuously monitored. After each test, maximum ventilation, respiratory exchange ratio (RER), possibly plateau in the increase in VO2, self-perceived exertion perception in the final seconds of the
baseline and after 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Muscle strength 1RM
Time Frame: baseline - 12 weeks
Muscle strength is measured by the one repetition maximum (1RM)test using a Technogym that includes a leg press (lower extremity), chest press (pectoral muscles), lateral machine (latissimus dorsi), leg extension (quadriceps femoris), abdominal crunch (rectus abdominis) and lower back press (erector spinae).
baseline - 12 weeks
Functional capacity 6 Minute walk distance (6MWD) test
Time Frame: baseline- 12 weeks
Functional capacity is measured by a 6 MWD test. The test is carried out over a pre-measured distance of 28 meters, in compliance with the American Thoracic Society (ATS) statement
baseline- 12 weeks
Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1)
Time Frame: baseline - 12 weeks
Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) is measured using a standard spirometry in a standing position with the use of the Oxycon Pro, Jaeger measurement system.
baseline - 12 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
patient reported outcome
Time Frame: baseline - 12 weeks
general wellbeing MOS SF-36 quality of life EORTC QLG C-30 + LC13 FACT instrument,general part (FACT-G) and the lung specific part (FACT-L) Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index anxiety and depression HADS Additional questionnaires will assess self-reported physical activity, labour market attachment, work ability and social reintegration. Demographic data is collected from self-developed questionnaires and training diaries.
baseline - 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 12, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

April 12, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

June 20, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FDAAA
  • HA-2008-06 (Other Grant/Funding Number: The Danish Cancer Society and The Novo Nordisk Foundation)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Exercise

Subscribe