Cognitive Remediation and Sheltered Employment in Schizophrenia (RemedRehab)

February 22, 2019 updated by: Nicolas FRANCK, Pr, Hôpital le Vinatier

Specific Cognitive Remediation for Schizophrenia (RECOS) and Sheltered Employment: a Multicentre Controlled Randomized Trial.

This study, driven on schizophrenic patients, is aimed at :

  1. Measuring the efficiency of the cognitive remediation program RECOS (COgnitive REmediation in Schizophrenia) on the capacity of the patients suffering from schizophrenia to improve the integration in sheltered employment (ESAT and EA).
  2. Comparing the efficiency of the program of cognitive remediation RECOS (RECOS arm) to the one of an usual program of coverage/care (TAU arm = Treatment As Usual) on integration in sheltered employment of patients suffering from schizophrenia.
  3. Realizing a comparative analysis, in both arms, of :

    1. the number of working hours achieved in sheltered environment during the 6 months following the two programs (reported to the working time planned by the contract of employment)
    2. the duration of such employments in sheltered areas.
  4. Estimating the impact of RECOS on the neuropsychological variables, the symptomatology, the consciousness of the disorders(insight), the quality of life and the social autonomy before the treatment (month M0), at the end of the treatment (month M3), and 6 months later (month M9), and looking for a correlation between the improvement of these parameters and sheltered employment.
  5. Estimating the impact of cognitive remediation on integration in sheltered employment.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

79

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bron, France, 69378
        • Hôpital Le Vinatier Pôle Centre
      • Bron, France, 69677
        • Hôpital Le Vinatier Pôle Est
      • Lille, France, 59000
        • Mental Health Center (MGEN)
      • Marseille, France, 13009
        • Hôpital Ste Marguerite
      • Nantes, France, 44093
        • Nantes University Hospital
      • Niort, France, 79000
        • Centre Hospitalier de Niort
      • Paris, France, 75014
        • Hôpital Ste Anne
      • Poitiers, France, 86021
        • Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit
      • Rueil-Malmaison, France, 92500
        • Mental Health Center (MGEN)
      • Saint-Cyr-au-Mont-d'Or, France, 69450
        • Saint-Cyr Hospital
      • Saint-Egrève, France, 38120
        • Centre Hospitalier de St-Egrève
      • Sainte-Gemmes-sur-Loire, France, 49130
        • Centre de Santé Mentale Angevin (CESAME)
      • Tours, France, 37100
        • Tours University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age from 18 to 50 years.
  • Schizophrenia according to the criteria of the DSM-IV-TR.
  • Project of entry to ESAT or to EA in the 6 weeks which follow.
  • IQ > 70 (F-NART).
  • Stable symptomatology during the month preceding the inclusion.
  • Psychotropic treatment unchanged during the month preceding the inclusion (change no more than 25 % posology).
  • Overdrawn performances in at least one of the 6 functions estimated by the kit of neuropsychological tests.
  • French mother tongue.
  • Informed and signed consent by the patient.
  • Agreement of the guardian (for protected adults).
  • Membership in a national insurance scheme.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dependence and recent abuses of cannabis (> 2 / week) or in any other substance (according to the criteria of the DSM-IV-TR), except tobacco.
  • Neurological disorders of vascular, infectious or neurodegenerative origin; dyschromatopsie.
  • Taking of medicine with somatic tropism having a cerebral or psychic impact (eg: corticoids).
  • Simultaneous participation to any other program of remediation targeting the neurocognitive deficits.
  • Resistance to neuroleptic.
  • Reading and writing not acquired.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: RECOS
The RECOS program (COgnitive REmediation for Schizophrenia) was designed by SBT Company and adapted by Vianin et al (2007) for specific use in schizophrenia. It includes computer based and paper and pencil exercises that target 6 main cognitive functions (selective attention; verbal memory; visuo-spatiale attention and memory, working memory, reasoning, and speed of execution) which have been recommended by the MATRICS consensus. Each exercise has 10 difficulty levels. Allocation of the training modules in RECOS is determined according to the standard scores obtained in the comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. Each patient participates in the module corresponding to his/her most altered cognitive area.

Every RECOS patient will benefit, with his therapist, from 2 sessions of 1 hour of training per week over a 14 weeks period (M1 to M3), plus 1 hour per week of task to be realized at home. All in all, it is thus about a training period of 42 hours.

After remediation, the follow-up of the patient will be led by his therapist with monthly appointments during 6 months (M4 to M9).

In parallel, neuropsychological and clinical scores will be assessed before (M0) and after the training period (M3), as well as at the end of the study (M9). Working and relational abilities will be assessed at the beginning and at the end of the working period (M4 and M9).

ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: TAU (Treatment as Usual)
The treatment of the group TAU (Treatment As Usual) will consist of the usual care proposed by every service of the various inquiring centers involved. No additional session will be proposed.

The treatment of the group TAU (Treatment As Usual) will consist of the usual care proposed by every service of the various inquiring centers involved. No additional session will be proposed.

In parallel, neuropsychological and clinical scores will be assessed before (M0) and after the training period (M3), as well as at the end of the study (M9). Working and relational abilities will be assessed at the beginning and at the end of the working period (M4 and M9).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of worked hours during the first 6 months of the contract of employment
Time Frame: Outcome measures are daily assessed during 6 months (M4 to M9)
Compared evolution in both arms (RECOS and TAU) of the number of worked hours, with regard to the number of hours planned in the contract of employment, during the 6 months following the entry in sheltered working environment (i.e. an external, validated and strong measure of the capacity of the patient to fit professionally).
Outcome measures are daily assessed during 6 months (M4 to M9)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compared evolution of the neuropsychological and clinical balance sheets between the beginning and the end of the Cognitive Remediation period (or the end of the "Treatment As Usual" period for the TAU arm)
Time Frame: Scores are assessed 3 times: at M0 (Inclusion), at M3 (after Cognitive Remediation or Treatment As Usual), and at M9 (6 month after end of treatment).
Compared evolution, in both arms (RECOS and TAU) of the scores obtained in the different neuropsychological tests, and in the scales of clinical symptomatology (PANSS, questionnaires of insight, self-respect, well being, social autonomy, and cognitive complaint) at the moment of the inclusion (month M0), early after the training period of Cognitive Remediation or Treatment as Usual (M3), and 6 month after (M9).
Scores are assessed 3 times: at M0 (Inclusion), at M3 (after Cognitive Remediation or Treatment As Usual), and at M9 (6 month after end of treatment).
Compared evolution of the neuropsychological and clinical balance sheets during the 6 first months of working contract (i.e. following the end of the training Cognitive Remediation period or after the "Treatment As Usual" period for the TAU arm).
Time Frame: Neuropsychological and clinical scores are assessed twice : at M3 (after Cognitive Remediation or Treatment As Usual), and at M9 (after 6 months of working period). Occupational integration (EATR) is assessed twice at the same moments (M3 & M9).
Compared evolution, in both arms (RECOS and TAU) of the scores obtained in the different neuropsychological tests, and in the scales of occupational integration (EATR), clinical symptomatology (PANSS, questionnaires of insight, self-respect, well being, social autonomy, and cognitive complaint) after the training period of Remediation and at the moment of the entry in sheltered working environment (month M3), and 6 months later (month M9).
Neuropsychological and clinical scores are assessed twice : at M3 (after Cognitive Remediation or Treatment As Usual), and at M9 (after 6 months of working period). Occupational integration (EATR) is assessed twice at the same moments (M3 & M9).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nicolas FRANCK, Professor, University Service of Rehabilitation (SUR) of the Vinatier Hospital
  • Study Director: Brice MARTIN, Doctor, University Service of Rehabilitation (SUR) of the Vinatier Hospital
  • Study Director: Isabelle AMADO, Doctor, Center of Study and Clinical Research (CERC) of the Ste Anne Hospital
  • Study Director: Corinne LAUNAY, Doctor, Center of Study and Clinical Research (CERC) of the Ste Anne Hospital
  • Study Director: Marie-Cécile BRALET, Doctor, Service CRISALID of the Clermont-de-l'Oise's Hospital
  • Study Director: Elisabeth GIRAUD-BARO, Doctor, Saint-Egrève's Hospital
  • Study Director: Julien DUBREUCQ, Doctor, Saint-Egrève's Hospital
  • Study Director: Pascal BLOCH, Doctor, Niort's Hopsital
  • Study Director: Christophe LANCON, Professor, Sainte Marguerite Hospital
  • Study Director: Eric FAKRA, Doctor, Sainte Marguerite Hospital
  • Study Chair: Jean-Michel ZAKOIAN, Professor, Ecole Nationale de la statistique
  • Study Chair: Christian FRANCQ, Professor, Ecole Nationale de la statistique
  • Study Chair: Pascal VIANIN, Doctor, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
  • Study Director: Nathalie GUILLARD-BOUHET, Doctor, Henri Laborit Hospital
  • Study Director: Muriel BONAÏTI, Doctor, Saint Cyr Hospital
  • Study Director: Jérome GRAUX, Doctor, Tours University Hospital
  • Study Director: Bernard DUBOUIS, Doctor, Mental Health Center MGEN (Rueil-Malmaison)
  • Study Director: Vincent SCHAER, Doctor, Mental Health Center MGEN (Rueil-Malmaison)
  • Study Director: Jérome SETTON, Doctor, Mental Health Center MGEN (Rueil-Malmaison)
  • Study Director: Vincent DELAUNAY, Doctor, Nantes University Hospital
  • Study Director: Marion CHIRIO-ESPITALIER, Doctor, Nantes University Hospital
  • Study Director: Ingrid DUR, Doctor, Mental Health Center MGEN (Lille)
  • Study Director: Sophie DELILLE, Doctor, Mental Health Center MGEN (Lille)
  • Study Director: Olivier MAZAS, Doctor, Mental Health Center MGEN (Lille)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 22, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 22, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 28, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 3, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 25, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Schizophrenia

Clinical Trials on RECOS (COgnitive REmediation for Schizophrenia)

3
Subscribe