Oligonucleotide Ligation Assay (OLA) Resistance Study (OLA)

March 10, 2025 updated by: Michael Chung, University of Washington

Drug-resistance Testing in Kenya to Improve ART Suppression of HIV Replication

The investigators propose to gauge improvements in the rate of durable suppression of viral replication by ART when OLA is used to guide clinical decisions at the PEPFAR Coptic Hope Center in Kenya, and to determine the cost-effectiveness of implementing this strategy at Coptic Hope Center.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Durable suppression of HIV replication is critical to (1) improving the health of infected individuals, (2) to reducing HIV transmission to sexual partners and from mothers to their infants, and (3) to maintaining the effectiveness of the current 1st-line non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI)- based ART. Across multiple trials, individuals with NNRTI-resistance, even at low-concentrations, have substantially greater virologic failure when treated with NVP- vs PI-ART. A cost-effective strategy is needed to detect and manage ARV-resistant HIV infections. A simple low-cost innovative assay the investigators developed and successfully transferred to Asian and African countries (oligonucleotide ligation assay (OLA)) can detect NNRTI+lamivudine (3TC) resistant HIV using reagents that costs <$7.00/person. Furthermore, detection of NNRTI-resistance by OLA is highly (P<0.001) associated with virologic failure of nevirapine (NVP)-ART in two retrospective studies; one of Thai women who had been previously randomized to single-dose NVP and the second of ARV-naïve Kenyan adults.

The investigators hypothesize that implementation of OLA into routine care will allow Kenyan clinicians to appropriately target protease inhibitor (PI)-based ART and improve rates of durable suppression of viral replication, and thus improve CD4 cell gains and individuals' health, reduce the transmission of ARV-resistant HIV within the community, and maintain the utility of NNRTI-ART. In addition, the investigators hypothesize that programmatically OLA-guided ART will be more cost-efficient compared to the current strategy of empiric use of NNRTI-ART as initial treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

991

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Maseno, Kenya
        • Coptic Hospital
      • Nairobi, Kenya
        • Coptic Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Confirmed HIV infection
  2. >2 years of age
  3. Qualifying for 1st-line ART based on Kenyan Guidelines
  4. Plan to reside in area for >1 year
  5. Adult patient or parent of minor agrees to study and provides informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Received ART previously from Hope Center
  2. Ongoing ART
  3. Plan to start 2nd-line ART

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pre-ART Oligonucleotide Assay (OLA)
Pre-ART OLA will be tested for resistance at 5 pol codons conferring high-level resistance to NNRTI and 3TC (K103N, V106M, Y181C, G190A and M184V)
Block randomization (1:1) to pre-ART OLA testing or OLA testing after 12mo on ART
Other Names:
  • Pre-ART OLA
No Intervention: No OLA (Standard of Care [SOC])
The participants will receive standard of care as per Kenya guidelines but will be offered OLA resistance testing after 12 months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Virologic Failure With OLA-guided ART vs. Standard of Care
Time Frame: 12 months
The primary endpoint will be a comparison of the rates of viral non-suppression >400 copies/mL between study arms at 12 months
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Difference in Virologic Failure Among Participants With Transmitted Drug-resistance (TDR) ≥10% Associated With Use of OLA-guided ART vs. SOC
Time Frame: 15 months

We did not analyze and report outcome of people with TDR ≥10%, instead we reported pretreatment drug resistance (PDR) as this parameter could be determined but antiretroviral history was not reliably available. Thus, PDR ≥10% is considered below in place of TDR ≥10%.

Chung et al. Lancet HIV 2020; 7: e104-12.

15 months
Difference in Virologic Failure in the Subgroup of Participants With Prior or Ongoing ART Use Associated With Use of OLA-guided ART vs. SOC
Time Frame: 15 months
The primary outcome was virologic failure defined as plasma HIV RNA of at least 400 copies per mL after initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART).
15 months
Prevalence of TDR by Consensus Sequencing and OLA
Time Frame: 15 months
We did not analyze and report outcome of people with TDR, instead we reported pretreatment drug resistance (PDR) as this parameter could be determined but antiretroviral history was not reliably available. Thus, PDR is considered below in place of TDR. PDR was assessed by OLA and confirmed by consensus sequence or next-generation sequencing.
15 months
Proportion of Subgroup With TDR With Virologic Failure by Randomization Arm
Time Frame: 15 months
We did not analyze and report outcome of people with TDR, instead we reported pretreatment drug resistance (PDR) as this parameter could be determined but antiretroviral history was not reliably available. Thus, PDR is considered below in place of TDR. The primary outcome for this analysis was the difference in virologic failure, defined as plasma HIV-1 RNA of at least 400 copies per mL following ART initiation, by PDR. [Chung et al. Lancet HIV 2020; 7: e104-12]
15 months
Estimates of Medical Resource Utilization During the One-year Trial Period
Time Frame: 15 months
Estimates of medical resource utilization during was not calculated. No data available (data on medical resource utilization was not collected during the one-year trial)
15 months
An Assessment of the Potential Long-term Cost-effectiveness of OLA-guided Testing Over a Patient's Lifetime
Time Frame: 15 months
This was not calculated as the model could not test for a period longer than 15 years due to computing limitations.
15 months
Determination of Whether Low-level ARV Resistance (<5%) Detected by PYRO But Not by OLA is Associated With Virologic Failure
Time Frame: 24 months
The prespecified outcomes of this study included differences in the rate of virologic failure over 24 months of efavirenz-based ART between participants by frequency of drug-resistant variants detected by next-generation sequencing at enrollment. Drug-resistance frequency was defined as the proportion of a nucleotide variant encoding a drug-resistant codon in specimens with at least 100 viral templates sequenced. Virologic failure was defined as plasma HIV RNA of at least 400 copies/ml in sequential specimens or at the final study visit in participants prescribed efavirenz-based ART. [Milne et al. AIDS 2022 Nov 15;36(14):1949-1958]
24 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Descriptions of Technology Transfer of OLA to the Hope Center Laboratory, Including Intra- and Inter-assay the Reproducibility, and Discussion of Obstacles and Possible Solutions
Time Frame: 15 months

Technology transfer of OLA to the Hope Center Laboratory in Kenya is described, including intra- and inter-assay the reproducibility, and discussion of obstacles and possible solutions.

Duarte et a. AIDS 2018, 32:2301-2308

15 months
A Comparison of OLA Results Obtained Using DBS in Kenya to Retesting of Same Specimens With Input of Viral Templates Measured in Seattle
Time Frame: 15 months
DBS were not tested in Kenya and thus, the comparison of OLA results obtained using DBS in Kenya to retesting of same specimens with input of viral templates measured in Seattle was not evaluated.
15 months
Detection of Resistance Mutations at OLA Codons by OLA vs. Consensus Sequencing
Time Frame: Enrollment
Rates of pre-treatment drug resistance among all study participants in the study were assessed by OLA but not by consensus sequencing (CS) due to the high cost of sequencing the entire population. However, all mutations detected by OLA were confirmed by CS in Seattle, and if not detected by CS were confirmed by next generation Illumina sequencing. Participants with any indeterminate OLA results were also sequenced to determine the genotype at the indeterminate codon.
Enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lisa Frenkel, MD, University of Washington, Seattle Children's Research Institute
  • Principal Investigator: Michael H Chung, MD, MPH, Department of Global Health, University of Washington

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2013

First Posted (Estimated)

July 12, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV Positive

Clinical Trials on Pre-ART Oligonucleotide Assay (OLA)

Subscribe