- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01900353
Vertical vs Horizontal Brushing: a Randomized Split-mouth Clinical Trial
Vertical Versus Horizontal Brushing: a Randomized Split-mouth Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Study population The study was conducted from October 2012 to December 2012 in the Dental Clinic of San Paolo Hospital in Milan. Sixty-one (61) students (19-24 years) attending the Dental Clinic were contacted with an information leaflet, explaining the aim of the study and requesting their participation with signed consent. Forty-nine (80.33% of total sample) agree to participate and underwent to an oral examination. The presence of seven evaluable teeth in each quadrant was considered the inclusion criterion. Exclusion criteria were the presence of oral mucosal lesions, periodontal pocket ≥ 4 mm, gingival recession, orthodontic treatment, caries lesions in buccal and/or lingual surfaces, removable prosthesis, use of mouthrinses containing plaque-reducing agents (e.g. chlorhexidine, essential oils, cetylpyridinium chloride) on regular basis.
One (1) subject was excluded because of the presence of periodontal pockets. Forty-eight (48) young adults were enrolled, five (10.42% drop-out rate) subjects did not attend the scheduled appointment and so the study reports data on 43 subjects.
All subjects were given a thorough professional prophylaxis to remove plaque, stains and calculus. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of San Paolo Hospital.
Study design and calibration of the personnel The study was designed and performed as split-mouth design. The subjects were listed and a list of true random numbers was generated (www.random.org). The generator was set to produce a true random sequence of "1" and "2", where "1" represented a mouth in which first and third quadrants were brushed with vertical method and "2" in which second and fourth quadrants were brushed with the same method.
A dental hygienist performed the brushing sessions. A calibration course was carried out one week before the starting of the study. She applied the two brushing methods first on Columbia Dentoform® and after on 2 volunteers.
Clinical parameters were recorded by one examiner (SM), using a mouth plane mirror (Hu-Friedy, Nr. 5, diameter mm 24) and a millimeter periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy, CP-15,5B - Qulix) under optimal artificial lighting. The examiner (SM) was previously calibrated.
Toothbrushing Subjects were asked to abstain from oral hygiene procedures for 48 hours before the brushing session to allow adequate plaque accumulation. Before the brushing session, all subjects used a dental disclosing tablet (Red-Cote, D&C Red #28, 1.5% w/w, Sunstar Suisse S.A., 20147 Saronno, Italy) to easily detect dental plaque on teeth and to highlight soft tissue abrasions following strictly the manufacturer's directions: rinse mouth with water, chew a tablet swishing around for 30 seconds, expectorate, and rinse again with water.
The same model of manual toothbrush was used for all subjects (Mentadent Tecnic Clean, Medium, Unilever Austria GmbH, 1023 Wien). The number of movements of the bristles on each tooth surfaces was set as five.
In the vertical toothbrushing method, the dental hygienist placed the bristles on the gingival margin of the teeth (two teeth are generally covered by toothbrush head) and moved the toothbrush in the occlusal direction; this movement was repeated five times for each couple of teeth, for buccal and lingual side. In the horizontal toothbrushing method, the bristles were placed on the teeth surfaces (the width of the toothbrush head covered the entire tooth surface) and moved distal to mesial and mesial to distal until the fifth movement was reached. The movements were performed one for posterior teeth and one for anterior teeth (canine and lateral incisor.
At the end of the brushing session, subjects were invited to repeat the disclosing procedure to highlight soft tissue abrasions produced by the bristles.
Plaque index evaluation The plaque scores were recorded two times, before and after the brushing, by one examiner (SM). The Rustogi Modified Navy Plaque Index was used(Rustogi 1992). The index evaluates 18 records. The buccal and the lingual surfaces of each tooth are ideally divided in 9 areas, scored as 0 (absence of disclosed plaque) or 1 (presence of disclosed plaque). The 9 areas are called a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h and i and they refer to the whole buccal and lingual surfaces: areas a, b and c refer to the gingival margin, areas d and f to approximal surfaces, areas e,h, and g to the middle areas of the surface and finally, area i refers to cuspal margin.
The mean plaque scores was calculated for the whole tooth surface, the gingival and in the interproximal areas scores for each subject.
The third molars, if present, were excluded from recordings. Plaque index of the central incisors was not considered because of the over-brushing depending on the split-mouth design of the study.
Gingival abrasions evaluation Gingival abrasions were assessed utilizing the method adapted by Danser (Danser 1998). The gingival tissues were divided into three areas defined as marginal for the marginal free gingiva, interdental for the papillary-free gingiva and mid-gingival for the attached gingiva. In the upper jaw the palatal mid-gingival area comprised the whole hard palate. The abrasions were measured using a periodontal probe placed along the axis of the lesion; they were classified as small (≥ 2 mm), medium (≥ 3 mm but ≤ 5 mm) and large (> 5 mm).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Milan, Italy, 20142
- Dental Clinic San Paolo Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- seven evaluable teeth in each quadrant
Exclusion Criteria:
- the presence of oral mucosal lesions, periodontal pocket ≥ 4 mm, gingival recession, orthodontic treatment, caries lesions in buccal and/or lingual surfaces, removable prosthesis, use of mouthrinses containing plaque-reducing agents (e.g. chlorhexidine, essential oils, cetylpyridinium chloride) on regular basis.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: horizontal brushing method
brushing methods
|
|
|
Active Comparator: Vertical brushing method
brushing methods
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
dental plaque score
Time Frame: 48 hours
|
48 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Maria Grazia Cagetti, DDS PhD, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2012CC01
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Dental Plaque
-
Trakya UniversityNot yet recruitingDental Plaque Imaging Methods | Dental Plaque Accumulation | Dental Materials | Oral Hygiene, Oral Health | Dental Plaque IndexTurkey (Türkiye)
-
King Abdulaziz UniversityCompletedWater Flossing Versus Dental Floss for Oral Hygiene in Children Aged 10-15 Years: A Randomized TrialPlaque AccumulationSaudi Arabia
-
King Abdullah University HospitalThe University of Sydney, Sydney, AustraliaCompletedDental Plaque | Dental Plaque Accumulation | Mouthwashes | Chewing GumAustralia
-
A.O.U. Città della Salute e della ScienzaRecruiting
-
Colgate PalmoliveCompleted
-
Colgate PalmoliveCompleted
-
Church & Dwight Company, Inc.Completed
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedPlaque, DentalSyrian Arab Republic
-
Lactea Therapeutics, LLCIndiana University; Oral Health Research Institute, Indiana University School...RecruitingDental Plaque AccumulationUnited States
-
Church & Dwight Company, Inc.Completed
Clinical Trials on brushing methods
-
Prince of Songkla UniversityCompleted
-
Heba sabbaghCompleted
-
Mashhad University of Medical SciencesCompletedDental Devices, Home CareIran, Islamic Republic of
-
Université de MontréalUniversity of Sao PauloCompleted
-
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas CityNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)CompletedTinea CapitisUnited States
-
Indiana UniversityCompletedGingivitis | Supragingival PlaqueUnited States
-
The Christie NHS Foundation TrustNot yet recruiting
-
Mahidol UniversityCompletedthe Optimum Brushing Force for Dental Plaque Removal and the Effect of Brushing Force on Enamel CharacteristicThailand
-
Université de MontréalMcGill UniversityCompleted
-
University of South FloridaNational Institute of Nursing Research (NINR); Tampa General HospitalCompleted