Improvement of Transient Elastography Applicability and Diagnostic Accuracy to Identify Significant Fibrosis by Experienced Operators Using the M and XL Probe.

January 15, 2016 updated by: José Antonio Carrion, Parc de Salut Mar
Transient elastography (TE)is the reference method to identify liver stiffness (LSM) but fails to obtain a measurement in 3% of cases and results are considered unreliable in 16%. The aim of this study is to evaluate the applicability and diagnostic accuracy of TE performed by trained operators (<500 explorations), after a second evaluation by experienced explorers (>500 explorations) and after a third exploration using XL probe. Inadequate LSM will be re-evaluated by experienced operators with the M (standard size) probe. A third register will be performed with XL (obese size) probe in those patients with inadequate M probe determination. Diagnostic accuracy will be estimated in patients with liver biopsy to identify significant fibrosis with a TE cut-off value of 7.6 kPa (kilo pascal).

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

868

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Barcelona, Spain, 08003
        • Hospital del Mar, Servei de Digestiu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with liver stiffness

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with chronic liver disease evaluated with TE by trained operators (experience <500 explorations).
  • Signed inform consent.
  • Aged between 18-90.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with ascites.
  • Pregnancy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients with chronic liver disease
Trained operator with M probe: non-drug intervention, baseline comparator.
Experienced operator with M probe: non-drug intervention, longitudinal comparator.
Experienced operator with XL probe: non-drug intervention, longitudinal comparator.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Applicability of transient elastography (TE)
Time Frame: Will be calculated after evaluation of all included patients with M probe by trained operators (at baseline and after 48 weeks), M probe by experienced operators after 72 weeks and XL probe after 72 weeks.
Applicability will be calculated as the proportion of reliable liver stiffness measurements (LSM). TE will be considered ADEQUATE when it included at least 10 valid measurements with a success rate ≥60% and interquartile range/median of LSM (IQR/M) ≤30% OR INADEQUATE.
Will be calculated after evaluation of all included patients with M probe by trained operators (at baseline and after 48 weeks), M probe by experienced operators after 72 weeks and XL probe after 72 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy of TE
Time Frame: Will be calculated after evaluation of all included patients with M probe by trained operators after 48 weeks, M probe by experienced operators after 72 weeks and XL probe after 72 weeks.
Diagnostic accuracy will be calculated with the number of correctly classified patients (wuth significant fibrosis) considering a cut-off value of 7.6 kPa.
Will be calculated after evaluation of all included patients with M probe by trained operators after 48 weeks, M probe by experienced operators after 72 weeks and XL probe after 72 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

July 16, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 18, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2016

Last Verified

July 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • APPLICABILITY- TE

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Liver Diseases (CLD)

Clinical Trials on Trained operator with M probe.

Subscribe