Promoting Patient-Centered Care Through a Heart Failure Simulation Study (HF SIM)

July 25, 2018 updated by: Intermountain Health Care, Inc.
The initial aim of this study will be to assess current methods of heart failure (HF) patient education in terms of patient satisfaction, level of preparedness for home, and care provider satisfaction. The second aim will be to design and create a "living with HF at home" simulation session. The third aim will test the hypothesis that hospitalized HF patients who receive education in a simulation room in addition to usual HF education will have improved qualitative and quantitative outcomes as compared to those who do not receive the additional education support.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Utah
      • Murray, Utah, United States, 84107
        • Intermountain Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female > 18 years of age.
  2. Ability to understand and sign a written informed consent form, which must be obtained prior to initiation of any study procedures.
  3. Documentation of HF of any etiology based on clinical assessment of the Primary Investigator, using standard-of-care criteria for diagnosis.
  4. Heart failure of either preserved or reduced ventricular function.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients requiring ICU monitoring
  2. LVAD candidate/recipient
  3. Cardiac transplant candidate/recipient
  4. Confusion
  5. Sepsis
  6. Terminal illness (other than HF) with expected survival of less than 1 year
  7. Enrollment or planned enrollment in another randomized clinical trial during this hospitalization
  8. Inability to comply with planned study procedures
  9. Active illicit drug use
  10. Participation in any other clinical trials involving investigational or marketed products within 30 days prior to entry in the study.
  11. Other conditions that in the opinion of the Primary Investigator may increase risk to the subject and/or compromise the quality of the clinical trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Full simulation and education
Patients who will receive full simulation and education session prior to discharge.
OTHER: See simulation room, usual education
Patients will be shown the simulation room prior to discharge but will only receive usual education.
NO_INTERVENTION: Usual care
Patients will receive usual care by bedside nurse.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Differences in Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) Results
Time Frame: 30 days

The mean differences in heart failure knowledge (from study enrollment to the 30 day study follow up) in each of the arms as assessed by the MLHFQ. Lower scores indicate improvement and a better health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

The MLHFQ is a self-administered questionnaire for patients with HF, comprising 21 items rated on six-point Likert scales, representing different degrees of impact of HF on HRQoL, from 0 (none) to 5 (very much). It provides a total score (range 0-105, from best to worst HRQoL), as well as scores for two dimensions, physical (8 items, range 0-40) and emotional (5 items, range 0-25). The other eight items (of the total of 21) are only considered for the calculation of the total score.

30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kismet D Rasmusson, FNP-BC, Intermountain Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 6, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 16, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1024572

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Full simulation and education

Subscribe