Monitored Anesthesia Care With Propofol Plus Remifentanil During Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Evaluation of Bispectral Index Monitoring

August 8, 2013 updated by: Yonsei University
There are clinical usefulness issues associated with bispectral index (BIS) for sedation of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, the clinical usefulness of BIS for deep sedation is incompletely described. The purpose of this study is to show that BIS-guided sedation is safe and useful clinically and may provide stable sedation status to physicians and patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

180

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 120-752
        • Department of anesthesiology and pain medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to II.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • body mass index (BMI) over 35 (Kg/m2)
  • hepatic or renal insufficiency
  • history of allergy to the drugs used
  • history of administration of anxiolytics, narcotics, antipsychotics, opioid.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: BIS group
The BIS group (n=90) was monitored for sedation depth using BIS during ESD.
For double blind method, BIS sensors were attached to all patients, but only BIS-group was measured by the value. BIS monitor was pushed back toward the anesthesiologist so that the physician could not see it. 3 L/min of oxygen was delivered by a nasal cannula to all patients throughout the procedure. Blood pressure was recorded every 5 minutes and heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation were measured continuously. For induction of sedation, propofol 1 mg/Kg and lidocaine 30mg was administered throughout IV line and immediately followed by continuous infusion of propofol 0.04-0.06 mg/Kg/min and remifentanil 0.05 mcg/Kg/min. The evaluation of sedation depth using OAA/S was performed at 1 minute after propofol administration, endoscopy insertion, submucosal inflation by 1:100000 epinephrine with indigocarmine, initial submucosal dissection and when the patient had restlessness or coughing additively.
Active Comparator: No-BIS group
The no-BIS group (n=90) was monitored by observer's assessment alertness/sedation scale (OAA/S).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
procedure satisfaction score of propofol addition
Time Frame: an average time for 1 week from propofol addition
The evaluation of sedation depth using OAA/S will be performed at 1 minute after propofol administration, endoscopy insertion, submucosal inflation by 1:100000 epinephrine with indigocarmine, initial submucosal dissection and when the patient have restlessness or coughing additively.
an average time for 1 week from propofol addition

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

August 13, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 13, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2013

Last Verified

August 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Early Gastric Cancer

Clinical Trials on BIS sensor attachment

3
Subscribe