Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab 0.5 vs Verteporfin PDT in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Pathologic Myopia (Brilliance)

March 31, 2019 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

A 12-month, Phase III, Randomized, Double-masked, Multicenter, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Two Individualized Regimens of 0.5mg Ranibizumab vs. Verteporfin PDT in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Pathologic Myopia

This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two different dosing regimens of 0.5 mg ranibizumab given as intravitreal injection in comparison to verteporfin PDT in patients with visual impairment due to choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathologic myopia (PM)

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This was a phase III, multi-center, randomized, double-masked, active-controlled study comparing 0.5 mg ranibizumab vs. vPDT therapy. The study included 15 scheduled visits over 12 months, and there were to be two additional visits (2a, 3a) for subset of patients in whom PK analysis were performed.

There were 3 periods in this study: Screening period-from Day -14 to Baseline; Treatment period-from Baseline to Month 11; Follow-up period-from Month 11 to Month 12 Patients entered the 11 months Treatment period at Visit 2 (Day 1) if eligibility criteria were met and were randomized in three treatment groups Group I ranibizumab 0.5 mg driven by VA stability criteria or Group II ranibizumab 0.5 mg driven by disease activity criteria or Group III vPDT (randomization ratio of 2:2:1) and received first treatment of either a ranibizumab injection and sham vPDT or sham injection and active vPDT and will return to the clinical center within 7 days to undergo safety assessments as well as assessments of the effect of treatment by the evaluating investigator. The following visits were performed at one month intervals starting at Visit 4 and continuing through Visit 14. At all monthly visits (at/from Month 2 for group I, at/from Month 1 for group II and at/from Month 3 for group III) the decision for treatment were made by the evaluating investigator based on the VA stability criteria and on the disease activity criteria. At Month 3 (visit 6) and at all following monthly visits for all three groups one of the three options can recommended by evaluating investigator: a) ranibizumab 0.5 mg, b) ranibizumab 0.5 mg + vPDT; c) vPDT. The treating investigator were then perform treatment based on randomization and masking requirements.

At each monthly visit, patients had a safety evaluation by the evaluating investigator prior to study treatment, consisting of visual acuity measurements, ophthalmic examinations and evaluation of adverse events and vital signs. Routine hematology, chemistry, and urinalysis profiles were obtained at Visit 6, 9 and 12 (Month 3, 6 and 9). At Month 12 several procedures and assessments were performed which are required at study completion visit.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

457

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China, 100730
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Beijing, China, 100034
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Beijing, China, 100176
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Chongqing, China, 400038
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Shanghai, China, 200080
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Shanghai, China
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Shanghai, China, 200092
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100730
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100191
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Chongqing
      • Chongqing, Chongqing, China, 400042
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Guangdong
      • Shantou, Guangdong, China, 515041
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Heilongjiang
      • Harbin, Heilongjiang, China, 150001
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430060
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430070
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Hunan
      • Changsha, Hunan, China, 410008
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Changsha, Hunan, China, 410011
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210029
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210006
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Wu XI, Jiangsu, China, 214023
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Jiangxi
      • Nanchang, Jiangxi, China, 330006
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Shandong
      • Qingdao, Shandong, China, 266011
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Shanxi
      • Xi'an, Shanxi, China, 710032
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Tianjin
      • Tianjin, Tianjin, China, 300020
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Tianjin, Tianjin, China, 300070
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310009
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China, 325027
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hongkong, Hong Kong
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Angamaly, India, 683572
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • New Delhi, India, 110029
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Haryana
      • Chandigarh, Haryana, India, 160 030
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Karnataka
      • Bangalore, Karnataka, India, 560 010
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Kerala
      • Vanchiyoor, Kerala, India, 695035
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Orissa
      • Bhubaneswar, Orissa, India, 751024
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Tamil Nadu
      • Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, 600006
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, 600 015
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India, 641 014
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Telangana
      • Hyderabad, Telangana, India, 500 034
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Pusan, Korea, Republic of, 614 735
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 03722
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 02841
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Metro Manila
      • Manila, Metro Manila, Philippines, 1000
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Manila, Metro Manila, Philippines, 1008
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10700
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Chiang Mai, Thailand, 50200
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Nakornphathom, Thailand, 73210
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • THA
      • Khon Kaen, THA, Thailand, 40002
        • Novartis Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Visual impairment due to CNV secondary to PM.
  • Best corrected visual acuity in the study eye > 24 and < 78 ETDRS letters.
  • High myopia (> -6D),
  • anterio-posterior elongation > 26 mm; posterior changes compatible with the pathologic myopia.
  • Either CNV locations in the study eye: subfoveal, juxtafoveal, extrafoveal.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Some preexisting eye disorders or systemic diseases;-Blood pressure > 150/90 mmHg
  • Prior focal/grid laser to the macular area -History of treatment with any anti-VEGF or verteporfin PDT in the study eye
  • Intravitreal treatment with corticosteroids or intraocular surgery within last 3 months in the study eye

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Group I
0.5 mg ranibizumab driven by visual acuity stability criteria
0.5 mg ranibizumab (intravitreal injections)
Other Names:
  • Lucentis
EXPERIMENTAL: Group II
0.5 mg ranibizumab driven by disease activity criteria
0.5 mg ranibizumab (intravitreal injections)
Other Names:
  • Lucentis
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group III
verteporfin PDT
Verteporfin for intravenous injection delivered by intravenous infusion followed by the light application
Other Names:
  • Visudyne

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline BCVA to the Average Level of BCVA Over All Monthly Assessments From Month 1 to Month 3
Time Frame: From Baseline to Month 3
Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was tested using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity (VA) charts testing protocol. VA measurements were taken in a sitting position at an initial test distance of 4 meters using ETDRS charts. The overall BCVA score was calculated using the BCVA worksheet, which was kept in the source data and the score was recorded in the eCRF.
From Baseline to Month 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline BCVA to the Average Level of BCVA Over All Monthly Assessments From Month 1 to Month 6
Time Frame: From Baseline to Month 6

Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was tested using the early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) VA testing protocol. VA measurements were taken in a sitting position at an initial test distance of 4 meters using ETDRS charts. The overall BCVA score was calculated using the BCVA worksheet, which was kept in the source data and the score was recorded in the eCRF.

Between treatment comparison of 0.5 mg ranibizumab intravitreal injections driven by disease activity re-treatment criteria (Group II) versus 0.5 mg ranibizumab intravitreal injections driven by visual acuity stability criteria (Group I) based on the average BCVA change from Baseline to Month 1 through Month 6.

From Baseline to Month 6
The Average Change in BCVA Score From Baseline to Month 1 Through Month 12
Time Frame: From Baseline to Month 12

Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was tested using the ETDRS VA testing protocol. VA measurements were taken in a sitting position at an initial test distance of 4 meters using ETDRS charts. The overall BCVA score was calculated using the BCVA worksheet, which was kept in the source data and the score was recorded in the eCRF.

Between treatment comparison of 0.5 mg ranibizumab intravitreal injections driven by disease activity re-treatment criteria (Group II) versus 0.5 mg ranibizumab intravitreal injections driven by visual acuity stability criteria (Group I) based on the average BCVA change from Baseline to Month 1 through Month 12

From Baseline to Month 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity Over Time
Time Frame: Change from baseline at months 3, 6, and 12
Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was tested using the ETDRS VA testing protocol. VA measurements were taken in a sitting position at an initial test distance of 4 meters using ETDRS charts. The overall BCVA score was calculated using the BCVA worksheet, which was kept in the source data and the score was recorded in the eCRF.
Change from baseline at months 3, 6, and 12
Categorized BCVA Changes at Months 3, 6 and 12 Compared With Baseline for the Study Eye
Time Frame: From Baseline to Month 12
ETDRS VA testing protocol. VA measurements were taken in a sitting position at an initial test distance of 4 meters using ETDRS charts. The overall BCVA score was calculated using the BCVA worksheet, which was kept in the source data and the score was recorded in the eCRF.
From Baseline to Month 12
Mean Change From Baseline Over Time in Central Sub-field Thickness (CSFT)
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, and Month 12
Central sub-field thickness (CSFT) is a variable assessed via Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). OCT was performed prior to any study drug administration to assess presence of intra, subretinal fluid, or increase of CSFT.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, and Month 12
Number of Patients With CNV Leakage (Center Involvement) in the Study Eye at Baseline and Month 12
Time Frame: From Baseline until Month 12
CNV leakage is assessed via fluorescein angiography (center involvement) category: definite, questionable, absent, can't grade, and missing.
From Baseline until Month 12
NEI-VFQ-25 - Change From Baseline to Month 3, 6 and 12
Time Frame: Change from baseline at month 3, 6 and 12
The VFQ-25 consists of 25 vision related questions across 11 vision related subscales, including general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, social function, mental health, role difficulties, dependency, driving, color vision and peripheral vision, and a general health rating. Items are converted to a 0-100 scale on each subscale and for the composite score where higher scores represents better functioning.
Change from baseline at month 3, 6 and 12
Number of Ranibizumab Injections Received in the Study Eye for the Ranibizumab Groups
Time Frame: From Baseline to Month 12
To assess treatment pattern with ranibizumab
From Baseline to Month 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 11, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 14, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 14, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 12, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 14, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 24, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations.

This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Visual Impairment Due to Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Secondary to Pathologic Myopia (PM)

Clinical Trials on Ranibizumab 0.5mg

3
Subscribe