Safety and Efficacy of Ranibizumab in Japanese Patients With Subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration

February 22, 2011 updated by: Novartis

Open-label Multicenter, Phase I/II Study Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Ranibizumab (RFB002) in Japanese Patients With Subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)

Open-label Multicenter, Phase I/II Study comprising three phases (single dose, multiple dose and extension phase), Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Ranibizumab (RFB002) in Japanese Patients With Subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The safety and tolerability of single intravitreal injections of ranibizumab was evaluated in patients enrolled in the single dose phase (Group A). Patients who successfully completed the single dose phase (i.e. did not experience a grade-3 targeted adverse event) could enter the multiple dose phase and receive ranibizumab injections for an additional 11 months. Simultaneously, the multiple dose phase was initiated in two parallel dose groups of additional patients (Group B), who received ranibizumab injections for 12 months. After patients in Group A and Group B had completed the multiple dose phase, all patients who provided written consent and were considered eligible based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the extension phase had the opportunity to continue on study treatment with the individualized flexible treatment regimen guided by monthly acuity scores and other ophthalmic examinations until approval of ranibizumab in Japan.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

88

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Japan
      • Tokyo, Japan
        • Novartis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

48 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Male or female patients 50 years of age or greater
  2. Patients with primary or recurrent subfoveal CNV secondary to AMD
  3. Patients who have a BCVA score between 73 and 24 letters in the study eye using ETDRS-like grading charts (approximately 20/40 to 20/320)

Exclusion Criteria

1. No prior treatment in the study eye with verteporfin, external-beam radiation therapy, subfoveal focal laser photocoagulation, vitrectomy, or transpupillary thermotherapy

Extension Phase

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Personally provided written informed consent to participate in the extension phase.
  2. Patients with subfoveal CNV secondary to AMD who had completed the multiple dose phase in either of the ranibizumab groups (Group A or B).
  3. Patients could participate in the extension phase even if they failed to do so on the day of the exit visit in the multiple dose phase (Group A and B), regardless of the time elapsed until the participation in the extension phase.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Received anti-angiogenic drugs (bevacizumab, pegaptanib, ranibizumab, anecortave acetate, corticosteroids or protein kinase C inhibitors, etc.) or
  2. Participated in any clinical study of an investigational drug other than this one during the period between the exit visit of the multiple dose phase and the start in the extension phase, if they failed to be enrolled into the extension on the day of the exit visit. Patients were to be excluded even when the fellow eye was treated with any of these drugs.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A: Ranibizumab 0.3 mg
In the single dose phase, all patients randomized in Group A received a single intravitreal injection of 0.3 mg of ranibizumab into the study eye. Those patients who successfully completed this phase entered the multiple dose phase, where they received an intravitreal injection of 0.3 mg of ranibizumab once a month for an additional 11 months. Subsequently patients enrolling in the extension phase received an intravitreal injection of 0.3 mg of ranibizumab according to an individualized flexible interval regimen guided by monthly best corrected visual acuity scores and other ophthalmic examinations. In the extension phase patients received the same dose level as they received in the multiple dose phase of the study, for an average of 1.70 years.
Drug: Ranibizumab
Ranibizumab was administered by intravitreal injection in the study eye. Intravitreal injection was performed by the investigator following slitlamp examination.
Other Names:
  • Lucentis
Experimental: Group A: Ranibizumab 0.5 mg
In the single dose phase, all patients randomized in Group A received a single intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg of ranibizumab into the study eye. Those patients who successfully completed this phase entered the multiple dose phase, where they received an intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg of ranibizumab once a month for an additional 11 months. Subsequently Group A patients enrolling in the extension phase received an intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg of ranibizumab according to an individualized flexible interval regimen guided by monthly best corrected visual acuity scores and other ophthalmic examinations. In the extension phase patients received the same dose level as they received in the multiple dose phase of the study, for an average of 1.93 years.
Drug: Ranibizumab
Ranibizumab was administered by intravitreal injection in the study eye. Intravitreal injection was performed by the investigator following slitlamp examination.
Other Names:
  • Lucentis
Experimental: Group B: Ranibizumab 0.3 mg
Group B patients received a total of 12 monthly intravitreal injections of 0.3 mg of ranibizumab into the study eye in the multiple dose phase of the study. Group B patients who enrolled in the extension phase received an intravitreal injection of 0.3 mg of ranibizumab according to an individualized flexible interval regimen guided by monthly best corrected visual acuity scores and other ophthalmic examinations. In the extension phase patients received the same dose level as they received in the multiple dose phase of the study, for an average of 1.45 years.
Drug: Ranibizumab
Ranibizumab was administered by intravitreal injection in the study eye. Intravitreal injection was performed by the investigator following slitlamp examination.
Other Names:
  • Lucentis
Experimental: Group B: Ranibizumab 0.5 mg
Group B patients received a total of 12 monthly intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg of ranibizumab into the study eye in the multiple dose phase of the study. Group B patients who enrolled in the extension phase received an intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg of ranibizumab according to an individualized flexible interval regimen guided by monthly best corrected visual acuity scores and other ophthalmic examinations. In the extension phase patients received the same dose level as they received in the multiple dose phase of the study, for an average of 1.36 years.
Drug: Ranibizumab
Ranibizumab was administered by intravitreal injection in the study eye. Intravitreal injection was performed by the investigator following slitlamp examination.
Other Names:
  • Lucentis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline in the Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score of the Study Eye at Month 6 in Group B
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6
The efficacy assessment was based on Group B patients. Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was assessed during all study visits using best correction determined from protocol refraction at a starting test distance of 2 meters. VA measurements were taken in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at a starting test distance of 2 meters. The BCVA score is the number of letters read correctly by the patient, hence an increase in score indicates improvement in acuity.
Baseline and Month 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline in the Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score of the Study Eye at Month 12 in Group B
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
The efficacy assessment was based on Group B patients. BCVA was assessed during all study visits using best correction determined from protocol refraction and ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at a starting test distance of 2 meters. The BCVA score is the number of letters read correctly by the patient, hence an increase in score indicates improvement in acuity.
Baseline and Month 12
Categorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Month 6 and Month 12 in Group B
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6 and Month 12
BCVA measurements were taken in a sitting position using best correction determined from protocol refraction and ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at a starting test distance of 2 meters.
Baseline, Month 6 and Month 12
Extension Phase: Mean Change From Month 12 (Start of Extension Phase) in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score of the Study Eye at Last Visit of Extension Phase in Group B.
Time Frame: Month 12 (start of extension phase) and last visit of extension phase. Duration in the extension phase varied depending on the study entry. The mean duration of treatment was 1.45 years in the 0.3 mg group and 1.36 years in the 0.5 mg dose group.
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was assessed during all study visits using best correction determined from protocol refraction at a starting test distance of 2 meters. VA measurements were taken in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at a starting test distance of 2 meters. The BCVA score is the number of letters read correctly by the patient, hence an increase in score indicates improvement in acuity.
Month 12 (start of extension phase) and last visit of extension phase. Duration in the extension phase varied depending on the study entry. The mean duration of treatment was 1.45 years in the 0.3 mg group and 1.36 years in the 0.5 mg dose group.
Extension Phase: Categorical Analysis of Best Corrected Visual Acuity of the Study Eye at Last Visit of Extension Phase in Group B
Time Frame: Baseline and last visit of extension phase - Duration in the extension phase varied depending on the study entry. The mean duration of treatment was 1.45 years in the 0.3 mg group and 1.36 years in the 0.5 mg dose group.

BCVA measurements were taken in a sitting position using best correction determined from protocol refraction and ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at a starting test distance of 2 meters. The following categories were evaluated:

  • Participants with a BCVA score loss of fewer than 15 letters from baseline at Last Visit
  • Participants with a BCVA score loss of 30 or more letters from baseline at Last Visit
  • Participants with a BCVA score gain of 15 or more letters from baseline at Last Visit
  • Participants with a BCVA score of less than 34 letters at Last Visit
Baseline and last visit of extension phase - Duration in the extension phase varied depending on the study entry. The mean duration of treatment was 1.45 years in the 0.3 mg group and 1.36 years in the 0.5 mg dose group.
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Area of Choroidal Neovascularization of the Study Eye in Group B
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9 and 12
Choroidal Neovascularization was assessed by fluorescein angiography in conjunction with color fundus photography. Analysis was performed by the central reading center. The area of Choroidal Neovascularization is expressed as Macular Photocoagulation Study standard Disc Areas (DA; equivalent to 2.54 mm^2 on the retina).
Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9 and 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Area of Leakage From CNV Plus Staining of Retinal Pigment Epithelium of the Study Eye in Group B
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9 and 12
Area of leakage from CNV plus staining of retinal pigment epithelium was assessed by fluorescein angiography in conjunction with color fundus photography. Analysis was performed by the central reading center. The total area is expressed as Macular Photocoagulation Study standard Disc Areas (DA; equivalent to 2.54 mm^2 on the retina).
Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9 and 12
Percentage of Participants in Group B With Absence of Leakage in the Study Eye at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12.
Time Frame: Months 3, 6, 9 and 12
Area of leakage was assessed by fluorescein angiography in conjunction with color fundus photography. Analysis was performed at the central reading center.
Months 3, 6, 9 and 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Foveal Retinal Thickness of the Study Eye in Group B
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9 and 12
Foveal retinal thickness was assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) at a subset of the study sites and was analyzed by the central reading center.
Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9 and 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Retinal Volume of the Study Eye in Group B
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9 and 12
Total retinal volume was assessed by Optical Coherence tomography (OCT) at a subset of the study sites and was analyzed by the central reading center.
Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9 and 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Novartis

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 30, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

January 31, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 24, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2011

Last Verified

February 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CRFB002A1201

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularization(CNV) Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)

Clinical Trials on Ranibizumab

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Australia

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe