Brief Motivational Enhancement Therapy for Concurrent Disorders

December 16, 2014 updated by: Yarissa Herman, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Brief Motivational Enhancement Therapy for Individuals With Psychotic Disorders and Concurrent Substance Use Disorders

The investigators are proposing a project that will examine the effectiveness of brief motivational enhancement therapy in a population with concurrent psychotic disorders and substance use disorders. This study will represent an emerging line of inquiry, as best practice interventions with this concurrent disordered (CD) populations are yet to be established.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Motivational enhancement therapy (MET) is grounded in research that explores the process of change. The MET approach assists individuals to move through increasingly higher levels of change towards action (making change) and maintaining change. The MET approach aims to invoke rapid and internally motivated change.

The Two MET sessions adapted from Sampl and Kadden (2001) are prepared as two individual sessions to reflect the original design of MET, allowing for client's to be met at their respective stage of change. Further, individual sessions allow the treatment to be tailored to client's individual reasons for change and personal coping strategies. The use of the Personalized Feedback Report (PFR) further encourages treatment around client's personal concerns and goals (Ramchand et al., 2011; See appendix 1 for further detail).

In the first treatment session, the therapist provides feedback from the initial CD consultation, using the PFR to stimulate discussion about personal substance use and reasons for change. Rapport building is also a key element to the first session, during which a strong therapeutic alliance is initiated. The second session is aimed at strengthening the commitment to change, exploring goal setting, and preparation for group.

The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) Schizophrenia Division introduced a CD service in 2009. Since the time of its inception, more than 200 consultations have been conducted. Of those consultations, more than 80%recommended attending CD groups offered with the Schizophrenia Program. However, less than 10% have followed those recommendations and attended the CD group.

Based on what is known about challenges surrounding engagement of CD clients in recommended treatments coupled with guidelines for evidence-based treatment with this population (Ledgerwood et al., 2008; Tsuang et al., 2006; Roncero et al., 2011), the purpose of the current study is to explore the ability of MET to increase engagement in CD interventions for clients diagnosed with psychotic and substance use disorders.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 1R8
        • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 65 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between the ages of 16-65
  • DSM-IV Diagnoses of a psychotic disorder and a substance use disorder (tobacco, alcohol and/or drug)
  • Fluent English speaker
  • Capable of giving written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any medical or neuropsychiatric condition, illness or disorder (e.g. unstable angina, severe dementia) that could compromise attendance to outpatient appointments.
  • Inability to provide informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Brief Motivational Enhancement Therapy
The MET intervention consists of two 45 minute one-to-one sessions with a MET-trained therapist. The MET approach assists individuals to move through increasingly higher levels of change towards action (making change) and maintaining change. The MET approach aims to invoke rapid and internally motivated change with respect to substance use.
Other: treatment as usual
The MET intervention consists of two 45 minute one-to-one sessions with a MET-trained therapist. The MET approach assists individuals to move through increasingly higher levels of change towards action (making change) and maintaining change. The MET approach aims to invoke rapid and internally motivated change with respect to substance use.
Treatment as usual includes case management as well as psychiatric appointments.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CD group attendance
Time Frame: 2 weeks
The primary outcome engagement with outpatient CD service as measured by CD group attendance.
2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Alcohol Use Scale (AUS)/Drug Use Scale (DUS)
Time Frame: 2 weeks and 3 months
The secondary outcome is change in substance use as measured by the AUS and DUS
2 weeks and 3 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Working Alliance Inventory
Time Frame: 2 weeks
A measure of alliance between the participant and the clinician conducting the MET sessions.
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yarissa Herman, D.Psych, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 7, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

August 16, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 17, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2014

Last Verified

December 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Substance Use

Clinical Trials on Brief Motivational Enhancement Therapy

Subscribe