Transplanted-like Heart in Critical Ill Patients

November 3, 2014 updated by: Riccardo Colombo, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco
The purpose of this study is to measure the dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system in modulating the heart rate variability and baroreflex control in critically ill.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Autonomic nervous system (ANS) is able to change both heart beat-to-beat interval and peripheral muscle vascular tone in response to different stimuli. Unfortunately the direct measure of the sympathetic and vagal activity appears not feasible in a clinical setting. ANS modulation is studied non-invasively by means of heart rate variability (HRV) and baroreflex sensitivity. Decreased HRV has been found in critical ill patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and sepsis, thus it has been supposed being a sign of autonomic dysfunction. Frequently, in mechanically ventilated critical ill patients the HRV does not show any oscillatory pattern, as well as it appears in the early months after heart transplantation. Under these circumstances the heart seems to lack the neuro-modulatory control by ANS and it seems to respond exclusively to the preload and afterload laws. This could have implications for outcome because autonomic dysfunction is associated with increasing severity of illness and mortality. Since the ANS modulation is a dynamic process that implies a central integration of a complex variety of afferent stimuli (from carotid sinus, cardiopulmonary receptors, pain,…) and efferences through sympathetic and vagal branches, up to the present it is unclear if in critically ill a reduced HRV at rest reflects a state of low requirement of ANS modulation or truly a failure of the ANS. To provide new insights into this important topic we study the changes of ANS modulation in response to a orthostatic sympathetic stimulus daily from the day of ICU admission until day 28, or the day of discharge from ICU if it occurs before the day 28.

Measurements. Beat-to-beat intervals are computed detecting the QRS complex on the electrocardiogram and locating the R-apex using parabolic interpolation. The maximum arterial pressure within each R-to-R interval is taken as systolic arterial pressure (SAP). Sequences of 300 values are randomly selected inside each experimental condition. The power spectrum is estimated according to a univariate parametric approach fitting the series to an autoregressive model. Autoregressive spectral density is factorized into components each of them characterized by a central frequency. A spectral component is labeled as low frequency (LF) if its central frequency is between 0.04 and 0.15 Hz, while it is classified as high frequency (HF) if its central frequency is between 0.15 and 0.4 Hz. The HF power of R-to-R series is utilized as a marker of vagal modulation directed to the heart , while the LF power of SAP series is utilized as a marker of sympathetic modulation directed to vessels. The ratio of the LF power to the HF power assessed from R-to-R series is taken as an indicator sympatho-vagal balance directed to the heart. Baroreflex control in the low frequencies is computed as the square root of the ratio of LF(RR) to LF(SAP). In the same way baroreflex control in the high frequencies is defined as the square root of the ratio of HF(RR) to HF(SAP).

The experimental condition is a sequence of three time point each lasting 10 min: (i) rest, with patient in supine position at zero degree; (ii) modified tilt; (iii) recovery, with the patient supine.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Milan, Italy, 20157
        • Azienda Ospedaliera "Luigi Sacco" - Polo Universitario - University of Milan
      • Rozzano, Italy, 20089
        • Istituto Clinico Humanitas

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients admitted in ICU with

  • age between 18 and 75 years
  • expected length of stay in ICU >24 hours
  • sinus rhythm on ECG
  • ectopic heart beats <5% of all heart beats
  • no contraindications of any kind to head-up 60 degrees position

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age <18 and >75 years
  • elective postoperative patients
  • non sinusal rhythm of ECG
  • ectopic heart beats >5% of all heart beats
  • spinal or head injury
  • suspected or documented intracranial hypertension
  • contraindications of any kind to head up 60 degrees position

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: All patients
To measure the autonomic nervous system activity elicited by a gravitational sympathetic stimulus in critically ill

Autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity is assessed by means of HRV, SAP variability and baroreflex control analysis daily from day 1 to discharge from ICU or day 28.

Analysis is performed (i)at rest in supine position with bed at zero degrees of inclination (ii) during modified tilt (MTILT) and (iii) recovery from MTILT in supine position at zero degrees. In a subgroup of patients motor sympathetic nervous activity (MSNA) is recorded at day 1,2 and 7.

MTILT consists in elevating head and trunk of patients at 60 degrees and lowering legs at 15 degree with a standard critical care bed. MSNA is recorded from the external peroneal nerve with microneurographic technique.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of autonomic nervous system dysfunction in critical ill patients
Time Frame: from day 1 to day 28
failure to change significantly HRV and baroreflex variables in response to MTILT.
from day 1 to day 28

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
to measure the occurrence of ANS failure in subgroups
Time Frame: from day 1 to day 28

subgroups: (i) sepsis; (ii) severe sepsis/ septic shock; (iii) failure affecting >1 organ as assessed by SOFA score; (iv) death/alive at ICU discharge We calculate the hazard ratio for each subgroup. We calculate the Cox's proportional model to identify the factors predisposing occurrence of ANS dysfunction/failure.

ANS failure definition: see secondary outcome

from day 1 to day 28
Length of stay in ICU and in Hospital
Time Frame: 8 months
We measure length of stay in ICU and in hospital of patients without ANS dysfunction, with ANS dysfunction and with ANS failure
8 months
mortality
Time Frame: 8 months
We measure mortality among subgroups of patients ((i)without ANS dysfunction, (ii)with ANS dysfunction and (iii)with ANS failure), adjusted for severity of illness assessed with Simplified Acute Physiology Score(SAPSII)
8 months
days free from mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: 28 days
We measure days free from mechanical ventilation among patients without ANS dysfunction, with ANS dysfunction and with ANS failure
28 days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
to define ANS dysfunction and failure in response to MTILT
Time Frame: 28 days

First, we take the HRV and baroreflex variables' changes collected at day 1 of ICU stay in the first 50 patients. We set two cut-off values: (i)below 25th and (ii) below 10th percentiles. We define ANS dysfunction the presence of at least 1 HRV variable OR 1 baroreflex variable respectively below the first cut-off value (i), otherwise we define ANS failure the presence of at least 1 HRV variable OR 1 baroreflex variable below the second cut-off value (ii).

Second, we prospectively test these cut-off values in the remaining 100 patients.

28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Ferdinando Raimondi, Director, Azienda Ospedaliera "L.Sacco"
  • Principal Investigator: Riccardo Colombo, Consultant, Azienda Ospedaliera "L.Sacco"
  • Study Director: Stefano Guzzetti, Director, Azienda Ospedaliera "L.Sacco"

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 14, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

August 29, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 5, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2014

Last Verified

November 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DR#13465/22Dec2011

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Autonomic Nervous System Dysfunction in Critically Ill

Clinical Trials on Gravitational sympathetic stimulus

3
Subscribe