A Pharmacokinetic Substudy of the TDE-PH-304 Protocol

December 12, 2023 updated by: United Therapeutics

A Pharmacokinetic Substudy of Subjects Transitioning From Twice Daily to Three Times Daily Dosing of UT-15C SR (Treprostinil Diethanolamine) in the TDE-PH-304 Protocol

A sub-study to the TDE-PH-304 protocol to assess the pharmacokinetics of patients transitioning from a twice daily dosing regimen of oral treprostinil to a three times daily dosing regimen.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

As noted above in "Brief Summary".

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

13

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14623
        • University of Rochester Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years to 71 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1) Only subjects who are eligible for and have entered into Protocol TDE-PH-304 may participate in this substudy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The subject must voluntarily give informed consent to participate in the substudy.
  2. No dose changes to study drug are made within 5 days of the pharmacokinetic (PK)substudy visits.
  3. No additions or deletions to concurrent medications are made within 7 days of the pharmacokinetic substudy visit. Note: changes to diuretics and/or anticoagulants are permitted.
  4. The preceding evening dose of study drug should have been taken 9 to 13 hours prior to the BID dose and 6-10 hours prior to the TID morning dose of study drug to ensure a trough level of study drug for PK sampling.
  5. Subject dosing of study drug on the day of PK sampling must be observed in the clinic by study personnel.
  6. Subject has not experienced a significant loss of blood (> 450 mL) within the last 6 weeks of the pharmacokinetic substudy visit.
  7. The subject must not be receiving any CYP 2C8 inducers or inhibitors

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Open label extension
Open label study drug.
Other Names:
  • UT-15C Sustained Release (SR)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To Assess the Pharmacokinetics (Mean AM Dose) in Subjects During Twice Daily (BID) Dosing (up to 14 Days Prior to Transitioning to Three Times Daily [TID] Dosing Regimen at PK Visit 1) and up to 35 Days After Transitioning to TID Dosing (at PK Visit 2).
Time Frame: Up to 14 days prior to transitioning to TID dosing regimen (PK Visit 1) and up to 35 days after transitioning to TID dosing regiment (PK Visit 2)
The PK sampling occurred over a 12-hour period in subjects during BID dosing (PK Visit 1) and during TID dosing (PK Visit 2). Prior to each PK sampling day, subjects must have been receiving a stable dose for at least 5 days.
Up to 14 days prior to transitioning to TID dosing regimen (PK Visit 1) and up to 35 days after transitioning to TID dosing regiment (PK Visit 2)
To Assess the Pharmacokinetics (Cmax, Cmin) in Subjects During BID Dosing (up to 14 Days Prior to Transitioning to TID Dosing Regimen at PK Visit 1) and up to 35 Days After Transitioning to TID Dosing Regiment (PK Visit 2)
Time Frame: Up to 14 days prior to transitioning to TID dosing regimen (PK Visit 1) and up to 35 days after transitioning to TID dosing regiment (PK Visit 2)
The PK sampling occurred over a 12-hour period in subjects during BID dosing (PK Visit 1) and during TID dosing (PK Visit 2). Prior to each PK sampling day, subjects must have been receiving a stable dose for at least 5 days.
Up to 14 days prior to transitioning to TID dosing regimen (PK Visit 1) and up to 35 days after transitioning to TID dosing regiment (PK Visit 2)
To Assess the Pharmacokinetics (AUClast) in Subjects During Twice Daily (BID) Dosing (up to 14 Days Prior to Transitioning to Three Times Daily [TID] Dosing Regimen at PK Visit 1) and up to 35 Days After Transitioning to TID Dosing (at PK Visit 2).
Time Frame: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 hours post-dose at up to 14 days prior to transitioning to TID dosing regimen (PK Visit 1) and at up to 35 days after transitioning to TID dosing regiment (PK Visit 2)
The PK sampling occurred over a 12-hour period in subjects during BID dosing (PK Visit 1) and during TID dosing (PK Visit 2). Prior to each PK sampling day, subjects must have been receiving a stable dose for at least 5 days.
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 hours post-dose at up to 14 days prior to transitioning to TID dosing regimen (PK Visit 1) and at up to 35 days after transitioning to TID dosing regiment (PK Visit 2)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To Assess 6-minute Walk Distance for Both Groups (BID and TID) 3 to 6 Hours Post-morning Dose.
Time Frame: The 6MWT was conducted during BID dosing PK collection (up to 14 days prior to transitioning to TID dosing regimen [PK Visit 1]) and during TID dosing PK collection (up to 35 days after transitioning to TID dosing regimen [PK Visit 2]).
The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) was conducted at PK Visits 1 and 2, and was performed between hours 3 to 6 post-morning dose to correlate with the predicted peak plasma concentration of oral treprostinil.
The 6MWT was conducted during BID dosing PK collection (up to 14 days prior to transitioning to TID dosing regimen [PK Visit 1]) and during TID dosing PK collection (up to 35 days after transitioning to TID dosing regimen [PK Visit 2]).
To Compare the Adverse Event (AE) Profile of BID Versus TID Dosing.
Time Frame: The AEs were recorded for up to 50 days.
AE diaries including 8 therapy-specific terms were collected during both BID and TID dosing to allow for comparison of events from both regimens. The therapy-specific events included: diarrhea, extremity pain, flushing, headache, hypotension, jaw pain, nausea, and vomiting.
The AEs were recorded for up to 50 days.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: James R White, MD, PhD, University of Rochester

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2013

First Posted (Estimated)

September 4, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Clinical Trials on UT-15C SR

Subscribe