Flexor Tendon Injury Rehabilitation Regime Study

Comparison of the Effect of Splinting the Wrist in Extension Versus Neutral Positioning During Rehabilitation Following Zone I/II Flexor Tendon Repair

Hand flexor tendons bend the fingers down towards the palm, and can be cut during a sharp penetrating injury (e.g. from a knife or saw). Damaged flexor tendons are repaired surgically with sutures (stitches). After repair, a splint is applied to the fingers, hand and wrist for six to twelve weeks to protect the repair while the tendon heals and regains its normal strength.

Most rehabilitation protocols use a splint in which the wrist position is kept straight (neutral) or bent (flexed). Some groups have described splinting with the wrist cocked back (extended) and have made the argument that this may improve outcomes, as experimental data suggests that splinting the hand with the wrist extended increases the range of movement of the repaired flexor tendon (excursion), and therefore reduces the chance of the tendon sticking down to the surrounding tissues (adhesion). Previous studies have shown no adverse effects from splinting hands with the wrist extended, and no evidence tells us which wrist splint position is better (a state of clinical equipoise or apparently equivalent outcomes). This randomised trial aims to produce this evidence, and therefore improve functional outcomes for patients in future.

We propose to carry out a study to compare the outcomes (grip strength and range of movement) of flexor tendon repair in two groups of patients: one with wrists splinted in a neutral position and the other splinted in an extended position during their postoperative rehabilitation. No changes will be made to patient assessment and management,the surgery undertaken and the rehabilitation regime other than those to splint position. Previous work suggests that both positions are safe and effective. Informed consent will be obtained from all patients enrolled in the trial, and we aim to find out if the extended splint position produces better functional results.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primary inclusion criteria for the study is patients who have had 100% division by sharp laceration to the Flexor Digitorum Profundus (FDP+)/Flexor Digitorum Superficialis (FDS) within zone I or II and who have undergone repair with cruciate and epitendinous suture. Patients with multiple digit involvement will be included in the study.
  • All repairs performed with 3/0 prolene suture cruciate repair and 6/0 prolene for the epitendinous repair as per departmental protocol.
  • Patients with digital nerve repair along with the above injury will be included in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with associated phalangeal fractures, skin and soft tissue loss or who had vascular compromise will be excluded from the study.
  • Patients with tendon repairs other than cruciate will be excluded from the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Wrist splinted in extended position
We propose to carry out a study to compare the outcomes (grip strength and range of movement) of flexor tendon repair in two groups of patients: one with wrists splinted in a neutral position and the other splinted in an extended position during their postoperative rehabilitation
Other: Wrist Splinted in the Neutral postion
We propose to carry out a study to compare the outcomes (grip strength and range of movement) of flexor tendon repair in two groups of patients: one with wrists splinted in a neutral position and the other splinted in an extended position during their postoperative rehabilitation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessing the Range of Movement up to 26 week post surgery
Time Frame: up to 26 weeks post surgery
The primary outcome measures will be "Range of Movement" (ROM). Total active motion will be measured using a Roylan finger goniometer following a standardised procedure and recorded on an electronic audit form (Appendix 1.5). This will be recorded up to 26 weeks post surgeries. Outcome data will be taken and recorded by a senior hand therapist who will be blinded to the position of splintage that has been worn by the participant.
up to 26 weeks post surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of Grip Strength at 12 and 26 weeks post surgery
Time Frame: 12 & 26 weeks post surgery
grip strength will be measured at both 12 and 26 weeks post surgery assessing change. This will be measured my using a Jamar Dynamometer and taken following a standard Procedure
12 & 26 weeks post surgery

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
assessing for flexor tendon rupture
Time Frame: 26 weeks post surgery
flexor tendon rupture to be identified by 26 weeks post surgery.
26 weeks post surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 15, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 24, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

June 24, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

September 11, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RBN854-STHK

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Flexor Tendon

Clinical Trials on Splint Extended

3
Subscribe