The Manchester Short Splint in the Rehabilitation of Zone II Flexor Tendon Repairs (Short Splint)

August 10, 2020 updated by: Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust

The project sets out to compare two different splints in the outcome of zone II flexor tendon injury hand therapy rehabilitation programme. Traditional hand therapy is based on using a long forearm-based splint for 6 weeks in zone II flexor tendon injuries. Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust have devised a new shorter splint to use as an alternative to the traditional longer splint as there are cogent reasons for believing that permitting more wrist movement during rehabilitation will improve the range of finger movement ultimately (tendonesis effects).

Patients will be randomised to receive either the traditional long splint, or the short splint. Patients will be followed up and data will be collected at routine hand therapy appointments.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Manchester, United Kingdom, M23 9LT
        • Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult male and female patients 16 years and over, undergoing surgical repair of zone II flexor tendon injury in a single digit

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients lacking capacity or motivation to participate in the planned physiotherapy
  • Adult patients with special needs and vulnerable groups
  • Adult patients who undergo surgical repair of their flexor tendon more than 4 days after the initial injury
  • Patients unable to understand English adequately
  • Adult patients unable to attend the hospital facility for the requisite number of planned physiotherapy sessions (social reasons)
  • Adult patients with multiple level injuries
  • Injuries with soft tissue loss requiring coverage
  • Adult patients with two nerve injuries on the same finger
  • Adult patients with multiple digit flexor tendon injury
  • Adult patients with concomitant bony injury to the hand
  • Children under 16 years age

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Short Splint
Short Splint that permits maximal wrist flexion and up to 45° of wrist extension with a block to 30° of MCP joint extension.
Active Comparator: Traditional, Long Splint
Traditional splint is a forearm-based dorsal thermoplastic splint that immobilizes the wrist in neutral position with a block to 30° of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint extension

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in range of motion of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the injured digit at baseline and 6 months
Time Frame: Active and passive motion ranges to be recorded at 3 and 6 months
Range of motion of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the injured digit as measured by hand therapist using goniometer (angle measuring device)
Active and passive motion ranges to be recorded at 3 and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rupture of repaired flexor tendon
Time Frame: Monitored at 3 and 6 months
• Rupture of repaired flexor tendon which is assessed and determined clinically by the treating hand therapist and confirmed by the responsible surgeon. Determined ruptured when there is no 'pull through' and the finger does not flex on attempted active movement
Monitored at 3 and 6 months
Tendon adhesions needing tenolysis
Time Frame: Monitored at 3 and 6 months
• Tendon adhesions diagnosed by differential active/passive range of motion as measured by hand therapist using goniometer. Confirmed by responsible surgeon
Monitored at 3 and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 11, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2015BP001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tendon Injuries

Clinical Trials on Short Splint

3
Subscribe