Effect of Water Exchange Method on Single-balloon Enteroscopy

March 24, 2016 updated by: Yanglin Pan, Air Force Military Medical University, China

Effect of Water Exchange Method on Intubation Depth and Diagnostic Yield in Patients Undergoing Single-balloon Enteroscopy: a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Patient-blind Trial.

Enteroscopy, including double balloon enteroscopy (DBE), single balloon enteroscopy (SBE) and spiral enteroscopy (SE) currently, have shown good performances in small bowel diagnostics and seem to be useful in the clinical routine. However, enteroscopy is a time-consuming procedure. During common practice, large volumes of air need to be insufflated for good visualization. It leads to significant distention of the small bowel during the examination, which makes further intubation more technically challenging because of the formation of distended bowel loops and acute angulations and limits the maximal intubation length. According to the published data, the oral insertion depth of different kinds of enteroscopy is limited to approximately 240 cm. The total examination rate range form 18% to 86% for DBE and 0% to 11% for SBE.

It is thought that the intubation depth in small bowel determines the diagnostic yield and the following treatment. The deeper the enteroscopy is advanced into the small bowel, the more lesions may be found and treated. In order to improve the intubation depth of balloon enteroscopy, several methods, such as carbon dioxide insufflation and decompression side tube-equipped device, have been tried and showed positive effects. CO2 insufflation could also reduce severe pain during DBE and residual gas retention after the procedure because of rapid absorption. However, it is not known how much CO2 insufflation can decrease the distention of small bowel and the formation of bowel loops.

Recently, the use of water infusion in lieu of air insufflation has been shown to facilitate completion of colonoscopy, even in potentially difficult patients with prior abdominal or pelvic surgery. Water exchange method obviates excessive lengthening of the colon and the formation of acute angulation, which may cause less pain and easier intubation during scope insertion. Recently, water exchange method was also tried in two patients undergoing SBE via antegrade route in our center. Distal ileum 8cm near to ICV and the cecum was reached respectively (unpublished data), indicating water exchange be a useful method for deep intubation of SBE.

Here a prospective, randomized, controlled trial was designed to investigate whether, compared with CO2 insufflation method, water exchange method could increase the intubation depth and diagnostic yield in patients undergoing SBE.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shaanxi
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710032
        • Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710032
        • Endoscopy Center of Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Suspected small-bowel disease

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior small-bowel surgery
  • Total examination of small bowel not planned when image modalities showed
  • lesions obviously located on duodenum, proximal jejunum or distal ileum
  • High-risk esophageal varices
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Inability to tolerate sedation or general anesthesia because of comorbidities
  • Inability to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: water exchange single balloon enteroscopy
Oral enteroscopy was performed first, followed by the anal route on the same day or later. For oral route, SBE was first advanced beyond Treitz ligation with CO2 insufflation. Then the water exchange method was used for further insertion. Briefly, residual air in the lumen was suctioned, and 37°C water was infused with a peristaltic pump through the biopsy channel to obtain lumen visualization. Turbid luminal water due to residual feces was suctioned and replaced by clean water until the small bowel lumen was clearly visualized again. Thus, infused water was removed predominantly during the insertion phase. The total volume of water was not restricted. For anal route, water exchange or CO2 insufflation method was used from the beginning of insertion respectively.
SBE was advanced as deeply as possible and complete small bowel visualization was attempted. When the following conditions were met, tattooing at the deepest position with India ink was performed and the endoscope was withdrawn: no further endoscopic advancement could be achieved, detection of a significant lesion and no other lesions suspected, severe stricture, obvious sedation and SBE-related adverse events happened which required termination of further intubation.
Active Comparator: CO2 insufflation single balloon enteroscopy
SBE was advanced as deeply as possible and complete small bowel visualization was attempted. When the following conditions were met, tattooing at the deepest position with India ink was performed and the endoscope was withdrawn: no further endoscopic advancement could be achieved, detection of a significant lesion and no other lesions suspected, severe stricture, obvious sedation and SBE-related adverse events happened which required termination of further intubation.
Conventional enteroscopy was performed as CO2 insufflated during insertion. Oral enteroscopy was performed first, followed by the anal route on the same day or later.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complete enteroscopy rates
Time Frame: up to one year
Definition of total visualization of small bowel: cecum was reached via antegrade route or antrum was reached via retrograde route; submucosal india ink was observed form 2rd SBE.
up to one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oral insertion depth
Time Frame: up to one year

Depth of maximal insertion is measured as follow:

  1. Counting folds on withdrawal---fold-counting method;
  2. shorten scope on Treitz ligation and deepest site.
up to one year
Diagnostic yield
Time Frame: up to one year
Inflammatory changes Ulcer Angiodysplasia Tumor Diverticulum Others
up to one year
Procedural time
Time Frame: up to one year
  1. Antegrade insertion time:

    From mouth to Treitz ligation From Treitz ligation to deepest point

  2. Retrograde insertion time:

From anus to cecum From cecum to marked or deepest site

up to one year
Adverse events
Time Frame: up to one year
Pancreatitis Perforation Bleeding Aspiration pneumonia Post-procedural pain score accessed by 100-mm VAS (1h, 3h, 6h, 24h) Others
up to one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shuhui Liang, M.D., Associated Professor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 2, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

September 16, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 25, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2016

Last Verified

March 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20131106-6

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Single Balloon Enteroscopy

Clinical Trials on water exchange single balloon enteroscopy

Subscribe