Investigation of the Ability of a Supplement to Increase Good Bacteria in the Human Intestine and Blood Sugar Levels (XOS2)

February 27, 2017 updated by: Zhaoping Li, University of California, Los Angeles

Study of the Effect of Prebiotic Xylooligosaccharide (XOS) on Microbita and Blood Glucose

This study aims to determine whether the use of a supplement called xylooligosaccharide (XOS) increases the number of good bacteria that live in human intestines and can maintain healthy blood sugar levels, and whether XOS has any unpleasant or unexpected side effects when consumed at different dosages. Subjects who participate in this study will be randomized to receive an eight week supply of either a lower dose of XOS or placebo (no active substance). This will be determined randomly, in a process similar to flipping a coin. Blood samples will be taken at each visits, including an oral glucose tolerance test. Subjects will also be asked to collect and bring in stool samples at three different time points during the study.

Subjects will have a 50/50 chance of being assigned to the either study group. This is a double-blind study which means neither the study investigator nor the subject will know to which group he/she has been assigned. In case of an emergency, the study doctor can get this information.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Prebiotics are highly effective and important for many applications in medicine. They are not absorbed and do not contribute to human nourishment, but rather exert a profound effect on the human bowel flora. The principal effect on the human bowel flora is to stimulate the growth of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus species. These are benign organisms in that they are seldom involved in infections or other pathological processes. However, numerous health promoting benefits of these bacterial genera have been noted, with effects on infectious and non-infectious disease. They induce host genes involved in innate immunity, sometimes in collaboration with other elements of the gut flora such as Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and Lactobacillus casei. Animal studies 2 indicate a protective effect against bacterial translocation from the GI tract. An extensive cataloguing of genomes of bifidobacteria and other intestinal bacteria reveals that the bifids play a very significant role in many important areas such as carbohydrate, amino acid, nucleotide, lipid, inorganic ion transport and metabolism; energy production and conversion; cell wall and membrane biogenesis; signal transduction mechanisms; transcription and translation; and defense mechanisms .

The metabolic syndrome which includes non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, obesity, and insulin resistance has responded to prebiotics in rodent trials; it is estimated that 20-30% of populations in developed countries have this disease. Parnell and Reimer have demonstrated that prebiotics oligofructose supplementation has the potential to promote weight loss and improve glucose regulation in overweight adults likely through suppressed ghrelin and enhanced PYY1.

The investigators have completed a study at UCLA studying the effects of XOS on human microbiota. There were three phases including a 2-week run-in period, 8-week intervention period, and a 2-week washout. Thirty two volunteers were randomly assigned to take a supplement containing 1.4 g XOS (1.4g XOS 70P), 2.8 g XOS (2.8g XOS 70P) or placebo.

Total of 32 subjects were enrolled into the study. One subject from the placebo group and one from the low dose group dropped out of the study for non specific gastrointestinal complaint.

Altogether, 120 stool samples were received from 11 low dose subjects, 9 high dose subjects, and 10 placebo group subjects. Bacterial culture was performed from all the 120 stool samples received. One placebo group subject, two high dose group subjects, and two low dose group subjects were excluded from the analyses because of compromised specimen quality.

The Bifidobacterium counts of the subjects after high dose XOS intervention was significantly higher from the base line at 4, 8, and 10 weeks. Similarly, the increase of Bifidobacterium counts was significantly higher in the high XOS group at 4 weeks compared to the low XOS group. The low XOS group had significantly higher Bifidobacterium counts compared to the placebo group subjects at 8 and 10 weeks. The total anaerobic flora counts and to some degree the total aerobic flora counts of the subjects after high dose XOS intervention were significantly higher from the base-line at 4 and 8 weeks. The mean changes of total anaerobic flora counts were significantly higher in the high XOS group at 4, 8, and 10 weeks compared to the placebo group. Interestingly, also Bacteroides fragilis group counts of the subjects after high dose XOS intervention were significantly higher from the base line at 4, 8, and 10 weeks and the mean changes were significantly higher in the high XOS group compared to the low and placebo groups. There were no major significant differences in the counts of Lactobacillus sp., Enterobacteriaceae, and clostridia between the three dose groups evaluated

The XOS was tolerated well by all study subjects (normal adult). At base-line, most of the subjects had relatively high counts of Bifidobacterium species with lower counts of Lactobacillus species. Several different species of each of these genera were present. Bifidobacterium species showed significant increases in counts in subjects on XOS supplementation, with the higher dose group showing significantly greater increases than the lower dose group. Both high and low dose groups showed significantly higher counts of Bifidobacterium sub-species than the placebo group. Lactobacillus species counts did not increase significantly in subjects on XOS supplementation. There was a statistically significant increase in the counts of the B. fragilis group at all time periods for the high dose XOS group. As mentioned before, bifidobacteria may induce host genes involved in innate immunity in collaboration with other elements of the gut flora such as B. fragilis group. The increase in the counts of the "total anaerobes" reflects the increased counts in the Bifidobacterium and B. fragilis group, both of which are anaerobic. Some Bifidobacterium species may grow aerobically as well, which may be reflected in the modest increase of the aerobic counts in the high dose XOS group. In this study, the XOS supplementation had no significant effect on stool pH or SCFAs.

The investigators propose to conduct a 10 week, randomized, placebo controlled, two arm study with 20 subjects with metabolic syndrome. Subjects will be randomly assigned to take a powder mixture containing 2.8 g XOS (2.94g XOS 95P) or placebo.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • UCLA Center for Human Nutrition

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 20-70 years of age at screen
  2. BMI between 27 to 35
  3. Fasting glucose level >100 mg/dL or >200 mg/dL at 1 hour after ingesting of 75 grams of glucose
  4. Subjects must read and sign the Institutional Review Board-approved written informed consent prior to the initiation of any study specific procedures or enrollment. A subject will be excluded for any condition that might compromise the ability to give truly informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any subject with a history of diabetes mellitus on medications, or other serious medical condition, such as chronic hepatic or renal disease, bleeding disorder, congestive heart disease, chronic diarrhea disorders, myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft, angioplasty within 6 months prior to screening, current diagnosis of uncontrolled hypertension (defined as systolic BP>160mmHg, diastolic BP>95mmHg), active or chronic gastrointestinal disorders, bulimia, anorexia, or endocrine diseases (except thyroid disease requiring medication) as indicated by medical history or routine physical examination.
  2. Any subject with a screening laboratory value outside of the laboratory normal range that is considered clinically significant for study participation by the investigator.
  3. Any subject who currently uses tobacco products.
  4. Any history of gastrointestinal disease except for appendectomy
  5. No antibiotics or laxatives use during the 2 months before the study.
  6. Any subject who is unable or unwilling to comply with the study protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Sugar Pill
Subjects will be asked to take the dietary supplement daily for 8 weeks. Blood samples will be taken at screen, baseline and week 8. An oral glucose tolerance test will be taken at baseline and week 8. Additionally subjects will be asked to collect their stool samples at Baseline, week 4, and 8. Subjects will also undergo a test to determine their body composition at baseline and week 8. Subjects will be asked to keep a diary of their bowel habits and any symptoms that might be related to the supplement. Subjects will be asked to recall the foods that they have eaten in the past 24 hours and to avoid any foods that contain XOS and probiotic bacteria during the study.
The placebo is identical in appearance to the XOS and contains 505mg maltodextrin
Active Comparator: XOS 2.8
Subjects will be asked to take the dietary supplement daily for 8 weeks. Blood samples will be taken at screen, baseline and week 8. An oral glucose tolerance test will be taken at baseline and week 8. Additionally subjects will be asked to collect their stool samples at Baseline, week 4, and 8. Subjects will also undergo a test to determine their body composition at baseline and week 8. Subjects will be asked to keep a diary of their bowel habits and any symptoms that might be related to the supplement. Subjects will be asked to recall the foods that they have eaten in the past 24 hours and to avoid any foods that contain XOS and probiotic bacteria during the study.
2.8g XOS is white or off-white crystalline substance and contains 500mg XOS 70P and 20mg maltodextrin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Effects of Xyloologosarcharide (XOS) on colonic flora in volunteers with abnormal glucose levels
Time Frame: 10 weeks
After 2 weeks of run-in, 20 healthy volunteers with fasting glucose level >100 mg/dL or >200 mg/dL at 1 hour after ingesting of 75 grams of glucose will be randomly assigned to take 2.8 grams/day or placebo for 8 weeks. The bifidobarteria counts will be assessed at screening, baseline and 8 weeks on supplementation of XOS and cessation of XOS.
10 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Effects of Xyloologosarcharide (XOS) on glucose and insulin
Time Frame: 10 weeks
Glucose, insulin and triglyceride levels will be tested at time 0, 30 min, 60 min, and 120 min after 75 grams of glucose load at baseline and 8 weeks.
10 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The effects of Xylooligosaccharide (XOS) on body weight and body composition
Time Frame: 10 weeks
Body weight and body composition will be measured at baseline and week 8.
10 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Zhaoping Li, MD, PhD, UCLA Department of Medicine
  • Principal Investigator: David Heber, MD, PhD, UCLA Department of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

September 18, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 1, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

No plan to share IPD with other researchers.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pre-diabetic

Clinical Trials on Sugar Pill

3
Subscribe