A Multi-Center Study Comparing the Clinical Performance of Two Silicone Hydrogel Lenses Over 1 Month of Daily Wear

May 31, 2017 updated by: CooperVision, Inc.
A Multi-Center Study Comparing the Clinical Performance of Two Silicone Hydrogel Lenses Over 1 Month of Daily Wear

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Two-month, single masked, randomized, bilateral, crossover, 1-month of daily wear in each study lens.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

63

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Campbell, California, United States, 95008
        • Family Eye Care Center
      • Whittier, California, United States, 90606
        • Golden Optometric Group
    • Georgia
      • Athens, Georgia, United States, 45701
        • Drs. Quinn, Foster, &Associates
    • Illinois
      • Oak Lawn, Illinois, United States, 60453
        • Davis Eyecare Associates
    • Kansas
      • Pittsburg, Kansas, United States, 66762
        • Kannarr Eye Care LLC
    • Minnesota
      • Medina, Minnesota, United States, 55340
        • Complete Eye Care of Medina

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Is between 18 and 40 years of age (inclusive)
  • Have the use of a mobile phone to send and receive text messages throughout the day for the duration of the study
  • Has had a self-reported visual exam in the last two years
  • Is an adapted soft CL wearer
  • Has a Contact Lens (CL) spherical prescription between - 1.00 and - 9.00 (inclusive)
  • Has less than 0.75D spectacle cylinder in each eye
  • Is correctable to a visual acuity of 20/25 or better in both eyes
  • Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease
  • Has read, understood and signed the information consent letter
  • Is willing to comply with the wear schedule (at least 40 hrs per week)
  • Is willing to comply with the visit schedule

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has never worn contact lenses before
  • Currently wears rigid gas permeable contact lenses
  • Has a history of not achieving comfortable CL wear (5 days per week; > 8 hours/day)
  • Has a contact lens prescription outside the range of - 1.00 to -9.00D
  • Has a spectacle cylinder greater than -0.50D of cylinder in either eye
  • Has best corrected spectacle distance vision worse then 20/25 in either eye
  • Has any systemic disease affecting ocular health
  • Is using any systemic or topical medications that will affect ocular health
  • Has any ocular pathology or severe insufficiency of lacrimal secretion
  • Has persistent, clinically significant corneal or conjunctival staining
  • Has active neovascularization or any central corneal scars
  • Is aphakic
  • Is presbyopic
  • Has undergone corneal refractive surgery
  • Is participating in any other type of eye related clinical or research study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: comfilcon A
Daily wear soft contact lens comfilcon A
Each subject randomized to wear the test lens (comfilcon A) or the control lens (lotrafilcon B) for one month of daily wear before repeating schedule for the second pair without a washout period.
Active Comparator: lotrafilcon B
Daily wear soft contact lens lotrafilcon B
Each subject randomized to wear the test lens (comfilcon A) or the control lens (lotrafilcon B) for one month of daily wear before repeating schedule for the second pair without a washout period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comfort at Insertion
Time Frame: Dispense
Participant rating for lens comfort on insertion. Collected at dispense for both study lens pairs. (0-10, 0= Very Uncomfortable, 10= Cannot feel).
Dispense
Visual Quality
Time Frame: Dispense
Participant rating of visual quality. Collected at dispense for both study pairs. (0-10, 0= Very Poor Vision, 10= Perfectly Sharp, Clear Vision)
Dispense
Average Daily Wearing Time
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participants measure of average daily wear time for study lenses at 2 Weeks.
2 weeks
Comfortable Wearing Time
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating of lens Comfortable Wearing Time for both study pairs. After 2 weeks wear for each pair. (The hours of average comfortable wearing time)
2 weeks
Comfort
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating for lens comfort. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. (0-10, 0= Very Uncomfortable, 10= Cannot Feel).
2 weeks
Dryness
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating for lens dryness. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. (0-10, 0= Very Dry, 10= No Dryness).
2 weeks
Handling
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating for lens handling. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. (0-10, 0= Very Difficult, 10= Very Easy).
2 weeks
Vision Satisfaction
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating for vision satisfaction. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. (0-10, 0= Very Unsatisfied, 10= Very Satisfied)
2 weeks
Eye Whiteness/Redness
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating for Eye Whiteness/Redness. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. (0-10, 0= Significant Redness, 10= Totally White)
2 weeks
Overall Sensation of Moistness
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating of overall sensation for moistness (hydration). After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. 5-point Likert Scale; 1=Excellent, 2=Good, 3=Average, 4=Below Average, 5=Poor.
2 weeks
Overall Sensation of Smoothness
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating of overall sensation for smoothness (deposit resistance). After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. 5-point Likert Scale; 1=Excellent, 2=Good, 3=Average, 4=Below Average, 5=Poor.
2 weeks
Overall Comfort Satisfaction
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating of satisfaction regarding comfort. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=Completely Satisfied, 2=Somewhat Satisfied, 3=Somewhat Dissatisfied, 4=Completely Dissatisfied
2 weeks
Overall Dryness Satisfaction
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating of satisfaction regarding dryness. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=Completely Satisfied, 2=Somewhat Satisfied, 3=Somewhat Dissatisfied, 4=Completely Dissatisfied
2 weeks
Overall Handling Satisfaction
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating of satisfaction regarding handling. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=Completely Satisfied, 2=Somewhat Satisfied, 3=Somewhat Dissatisfied, 4=Completely Dissatisfied
2 weeks
Overall Vision Satisfaction
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating of satisfaction regarding vision. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=Completely Satisfied, 2=Somewhat Satisfied, 3=Somewhat Dissatisfied, 4=Completely Dissatisfied
2 weeks
Overall Satisfaction
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant rating of satisfaction overall. After 2 weeks wear for each study pair. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=Completely Satisfied, 2=Somewhat Satisfied, 3=Somewhat Dissatisfied, 4=Completely Dissatisfied
2 weeks
Lens Preference, Pair 1 Comfilcon A
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant preference for habitual lenses or study lenses with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision and overall. Collected at 2 weeks for study pair 1. (Randomized to comfilcon A as pair 1; Forced choice: Pair 1 or Habitual)
2 weeks
Lens Preference, Pair 1 Lotrafilcon B
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant preference for habitual lenses or study lenses with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision and overall. Collected at 2 weeks for study pair 1. (Randomized to lotrafilcon B as pair 1; Forced choice: Pair 1 or Habitual )
2 weeks
Comfortable Wearing Time
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating of lens Comfortable Wearing Time for both study pairs. Collected at 4 weeks wear. (The hours of average comfortable wearing time)
4 weeks
Average Daily Wearing Time
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participants measure of average daily wear time for study lenses at 4 weeks.
4 weeks
Rewetting Drops
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant use of rewetting drops. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. (Uses rewetting drops / Does not use rewetting drops).
4 weeks
Comfort
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating for lens comfort. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. (0-10, 0= Very Uncomfortable, 10= Cannot Feel).
4 weeks
Dryness
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating for lens dryness. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. (0-10, 0= Very Dry, 10= No Dryness).
4 weeks
Handling
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating for lens handling. Collected at 4 weeks. (0-10, 0= Very Difficult, 10= Very Easy).
4 weeks
Vision Satisfaction
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating for vision satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. (0-10, 0= Very Unsatisfied, 10= Very Satisfied)
4 weeks
Eye Whiteness/Redness
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating for Eye Whiteness/Redness. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. (0-10, 0= Significant Redness, 10= Totally White)
4 weeks
Overall Sensation of Moistness
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating of overall sensation for moistness (hydration). Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. 5-point Likert Scale; 1=Excellent, 2=Good, 3=Average, 4=Below Average, 5=Poor.
4 weeks
Overall Sensation of Smoothness
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating of overall sensation for smoothness (deposit resistance). Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. 5-point Likert Scale; 1=Excellent, 2=Good, 3=Average, 4=Below Average, 5=Poor.
4 weeks
Overall Comfort Satisfaction
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating of satisfaction regarding comfort. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=Completely Satisfied, 2=Somewhat Satisfied, 3=Somewhat Dissatisfied, 4=Completely Dissatisfied
4 weeks
Overall Dryness Satisfaction
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating of satisfaction regarding dryness. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=Completely Satisfied, 2=Somewhat Satisfied, 3=Somewhat Dissatisfied, 4=Completely Dissatisfied
4 weeks
Overall Handling Satisfaction
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating of satisfaction regarding handling. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=Completely Satisfied, 2=Somewhat Satisfied, 3=Somewhat Dissatisfied, 4=Completely Dissatisfied
4 weeks
Overall Vision Satisfaction
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating of overall satisfaction for vision. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=Completely Satisfied, 2=Somewhat Satisfied, 3=Somewhat Dissatisfied, 4=Completely Dissatisfied
4 weeks
Overall Satisfaction
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant rating of satisfaction overall. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=Completely Satisfied, 2=Somewhat Satisfied, 3=Somewhat Dissatisfied, 4=Completely Dissatisfied
4 weeks
Lens Preference
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant lens preference in regard for comfort, dryness, handling, vision and overall. Collected at 4 weeks. (Forced Choice; Study Pair 1, Study Pair 2).
4 weeks
Lens Preference Comfort, Dryness, Vision and Overall.
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant lens preference regarding comfort, dryness, vision and overall. Collected at study exit. (Forced Choice; Study Pair 1, Study Pair 2, Habitual).
4 weeks
Lens Preference for Handling
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant lens preference regarding handling. Collected at study exit. (Forced Choice; Study Pair 1, Study Pair 2, Habitual).
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Binocular Visual Acuity logMAR
Time Frame: Dispense
Assessment of visual acuity (VA). Collected at 2 weeks for both study lens pairs. Binocular High Contrast Distance. logMAR (negative logMAR values indicates better Visual Acuity (VA)). 0.0 logMAR = 20/20 snellen chart
Dispense
Surface Wetting
Time Frame: Dispense
Assessment of surface wetting by slit lamp. Collected at dispense for both study pairs. 0=Non-wettable surface, 1= > 1 non-wetting area of some magnitude., 2=One non-wetting area of some magnitude, 3=Hazy surface that resolves with a blink. Typical soft lens appearance with long drying time., 4=Smooth uniformly reflective surface. Appearance of a healthy cornea (Grade 0-4 in ½ steps)
Dispense
Surface Deposition
Time Frame: Dispense
Assessment of surface deposition by slit lamp. Collected at dispense for both study pairs. (Grade 0-4 in ½ steps; Clean= 0; Deposited = 4)
Dispense
Centration
Time Frame: Dispense
Assessment of lens centration. Collected at dispense for both study pairs. Biomicroscopy; by degree and direction in the primary position. (Rated as Optimal Centration or Not Optimal)
Dispense
Corneal Coverage
Time Frame: Dispense
Assessment of lens corneal coverage. Collected at dispense for both study pairs. Biomicroscopy; assessed in primary gaze. (Rated as Normal Coverage or Not Covering)
Dispense
Post Blink Movement
Time Frame: Dispense
Assessment of post blink movement. Collected at dispense for both study lens pairs. Assessed immediately after the blink. (0-4, 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 1=Minimal, but acceptable movement, 2=Optimal movement, 3=Moderate, but acceptable movement, 4=Excessive, unacceptable movement)
Dispense
Push Up Test
Time Frame: Dispense
Assessment of lens tightness. Collected at dispense for both study pairs. Digital push up test. Continuous Scale (0-100%, 0%=Falls from cornea without lid support, 50%= Optimum, 100%= No movement)
Dispense
Overall Fit Acceptance
Time Frame: Dispense
Assessment of overall lens fit acceptance. Collected at dispense for both study pairs. (0-4, 0=should not be worn, 1=borderline but unacceptable, 2=minimally acceptable, early review, 3=not perfect but okay to dispense, 4=perfect)
Dispense
Rewetting Drops
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Participant use of rewetting drops. Collected at 2 weeks for both study lens pairs. (Uses rewetting drops / Does not use rewetting drops).
2 weeks
Binocular Visual Acuity logMAR
Time Frame: 2 Weeks
Assessment of visual acuity (VA). Collected at 2 weeks for both study lens pairs. Binocular High Contrast Distance. logMAR (negative logMAR values indicates better Visual Acuity (VA)). 0.0 logMAR = 20/20 snellen chart
2 Weeks
Surface Wetting
Time Frame: 2 Weeks
Assessment of surface wetting by slit lamp. Collected at 2 weeks for both study lens pairs. 0=Non-wettable surface, 1= > 1 non-wetting area of some magnitude., 2=One non-wetting area of some magnitude, 3=Hazy surface that resolves with a blink. Typical soft lens appearance with long drying time., 4=Smooth uniformly reflective surface. Appearance of a healthy cornea (Grade 0-4 in ½ steps)
2 Weeks
Surface Deposition
Time Frame: 2 Weeks
Assessment of surface deposition by slit lamp. Collected at 2 weeks for both study lens pairs. (Grade 0-4 in 1/2 steps; 0=clean, 4=deposited)
2 Weeks
Centration
Time Frame: 2 Weeks
Assessment of lens centration. Collected at 2 weeks. Biomicroscopy; by degree and direction in the primary position. Optimal versus not optimal
2 Weeks
Corneal Coverage
Time Frame: 2 Weeks
Assessment of lens corneal coverage. Collected at 2 weeks for both study pairs. Biomicroscopy; assessed in primary gaze. (Rated as Normal Coverage or Not Covering)
2 Weeks
Post Blink Movement
Time Frame: 2 Weeks
Assessment of post blink movement. Collected at 2 weeks for both study lens pairs. Assessed immediately after the blink. (Graded 0-4, 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 1=Minimal, but acceptable movement, 2=Optimal movement, 3=Moderate, but acceptable movement, 4=Excessive, unacceptable movement)
2 Weeks
Push Up Test
Time Frame: 2 Weeks
Assessment of lens tightness. Collected at 2 weeks for both study pairs. Digital push up test. (Continuous Scale 0-100%, 0%=Falls from cornea without lid support, 50%= Optimum, 100%= No movement)
2 Weeks
Overall Fit Acceptance
Time Frame: 2 Weeks
Assessment of overall lens fit acceptance. Collected at 2 weeks for both study pairs. (0-4, 0=should not be worn, 1=borderline but unacceptable, 2=minimally acceptable, early review, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)
2 Weeks
Binocular Visual Acuity logMAR
Time Frame: 4 Weeks
Assessment of visual acuity (VA). Collected at 2 weeks for both study lens pairs. Binocular High Contrast Distance. logMAR (negative logMAR values indicates better Visual Acuity (VA)). 0.0 logMAR = 20/20 snellen chart
4 Weeks
Surface Wetting
Time Frame: 4 Weeks
Assessment of surface wetting by slit lamp. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. 0=Non-wettable surface, 1= > 1 non-wetting area of some magnitude., 2=One non-wetting area of some magnitude, 3=Hazy surface that resolves with a blink. Typical soft lens appearance with long drying time., 4=Smooth uniformly reflective surface. Appearance of a healthy cornea (Grade 0-4 in ½ steps)
4 Weeks
Surface Deposition
Time Frame: 4 Weeks
Assessment of surface deposition by slit lamp. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. (Grade 0-4 in 1/2 steps; 0=clean, 4=deposited)
4 Weeks
Centration
Time Frame: 4 Weeks
Assessment of lens centration. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs.. Biomicroscopy, by degree and direction in the primary position. (Optimal Centration or Not Optimal)
4 Weeks
Corneal Coverage
Time Frame: 4 Weeks
Assessment of lens corneal coverage. Collected at 4 weeks. (Biomicroscopy; assessed in primary gaze, Normal Coverage or Not Covering)
4 Weeks
Post Blink Movement
Time Frame: 4 Weeks
Assessment of post blink movement. Collected at 4 weeks. Assessed immediately after the blink. (Graded 0-4, 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 1=Minimal, but acceptable movement, 2=Optimal movement, 3=Moderate, but acceptable movement, 4=Excessive, unacceptable movement)
4 Weeks
Push Up Test
Time Frame: 4 Weeks
Assessment of lens tightness. Collected at 4 weeks. Digital push up test. (Continuous Scale 0-100%, 0%=Falls from cornea without lid support, 50%= Optimum, 100%= No movement)
4 Weeks
Overall Fit Acceptance
Time Frame: 4 Weeks
Assessment of overall lens fit acceptance. Collected at 4 weeks. (0-4, 0=should not be worn, 1=borderline but unacceptable, 2=minimally acceptable, early review, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)
4 Weeks
Likelihood of Switching From Habitual Lens to Study Lens
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant likelihood of switching from their habitual lens to the study lens. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=very likely, 2=likely, 3=unlikely, 4=very unlikely
4 weeks
Likelihood to Continue Wearing the Study Lens
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant likelihood of continuing wear of the study lense. Collected at 4 weeks wear for both study lens pairs. 4-point Likert Scale; 1=Very Likely, 2=Likely, 3=Unlikely, 4=Very Unlikely
4 weeks
Participant Recommendation of a Study Lens
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant most likely recommendation of which study lens to friends, family or colleagues. Collected at study exit. (Forced Choice; Study Pair 1, Study Pair 2).
4 weeks
Participant Likelihood of Recommendation of a Study Lens
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Participant likelihood of recommending a study lens to friends. Collected at study exit. (1-4; 1=Very Unlikely, 2=Unlikely, 3=Likely, 4=Very Likely).
4 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Number of Trials Needed to Achieve Final Dispensing Pair of Study Lenses.
Time Frame: Dispense
The number of trials needed to achieve final dispensing pair of study lenses. Number of lenses required to dispense the final pair of study lenses. Collected at dispense for both study lens pairs. (Number required; 1, 2, 3, >3)
Dispense

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Donald Siegel, OD, CooperVision, US

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

September 30, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 26, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EX-MKTG-41

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myopia

Clinical Trials on lotrafilcon B

Subscribe