Trichuris Suis Ova Treatment in Left-sided Ulcerative Colitis

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase II Clinical Study of Trichuris Suis Ova Treatment in Left-sided Ulcerative Colitis and Its Effects on Mucosal Immune State and Microbiota

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of trichuris suis ova (TSO) in ulcerative colitis (UC). We will look at how TSO affects the body's immune response and if there are related changes in participants' UC.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

The cause of UC, an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), is not well understood. It is believed to be caused from an abnormal immune response to the normal bacteria that live in the gut (intestines and colon). This response acts as an "attack" on the healthy tissue of the bowel by a person's own immune cells which leads to disease.

It is well known that autoimmune diseases such as IBD, asthma, diabetes, and multiple sclerosis are more common in industrialized, well-developed countries with better sanitation and hygiene, as in the United States. These "cleaner" environments reduce exposure to germs and parasites naturally found in the environment. This reduced exposure may trigger responses in the body that make people more prone to diseases such as UC. People in non-industrialized countries and the tropics, where parasites are common, rarely develop these diseases. This observation has led researchers to want to better understand the relationship between the lack of natural bacteria in the gut and the onset of autoimmune diseases like as UC.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University School of Medicine
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510
        • Yale University
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • University of Chicago
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
    • Iowa
      • Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242
        • University of Iowa Hospital
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • University of Maryland
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02111
        • Tufts Medical Center
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Weill Cornell Medical College
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19103
        • Drexel University
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • University of Pittsburgh
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37212
        • Vanderbilt University
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Baylor College of Medicine
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98101
        • Virginia Mason Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject has provided written informed consent
  2. Diagnosis of UC (newly diagnosed or established patients) as determined by medical history, endoscopic and histological confirmation with the proximal disease extent limited to the left colon (distal to the splenic flexure), and accessible by flexible sigmoidoscopy. Patients with left-sided disease and the presence of a periappendiceal red patch (limited cecal inflammation) will be eligible as long as there is no intervening evidence of colitis between the cecal base and the upper boundary of inflammation in the left colon.
  3. Mayo score >/= 4, as scored at Screen 2
  4. If taking the following medications at Screen 1, subjects must meet the following criteria:

    1. Oral Corticosteroids: stable treatment for at least 4 weeks prior to Day 0 with a maximum dose equivalent to <\=15 mg/day of prednisone
    2. Immunosuppressants (azathioprine (AZA) or 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP)): treatment for at least 12 weeks with a stable dose, not exceeding 2.5 mg/kg/day of AZA or 1.5 mg/kg/day of 6-MP, during the 4 weeks prior to Day 0
    3. Aminosalicylates: stable oral doses up to 4.8 g/day for at least 4 weeks prior to Day 0.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects whose UC is anticipated to require surgical, endoscopic, or radiologic intervention during study participation
  2. Uncontrolled GI bleeding
  3. Subjects who have disease limited to the rectum (maximum disease extent of less than 15 cm)
  4. Women who are pregnant, breast-feeding, or planning to become pregnant during the study. All women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test at Screen 2 prior to randomization of treatment.
  5. Women of childbearing potential not using adequate birth control measures (e.g., total abstinence, oral contraceptives, intrauterine device, barrier method with spermicide, surgical sterilization, Depo-Provera, or hormonal implants).
  6. Current or recent serious systemic disorder including clinically significant impairment in cardiac, pulmonary, liver, renal, endocrine, hematologic, or neurologic function, based on investigator discretion
  7. Subjects currently receiving the following concomitant medications:

    1. Prednisone or its equivalent at unstable doses or at doses exceeding 15 mg/day within 4 weeks prior to Day 0
    2. Local steroids such as budesonide, Colifoam, or Predsol enemas within 2 weeks prior to Screen 2
    3. Topical therapies, either mesalamine or steroids, taken within 2 weeks of Screen 2
    4. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors, or aspirin >100 mg/day within 2 weeks prior to Screen 2
    5. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibitors including but not limited to infliximab (Remicade) or adalimumab (Humira) within 12 weeks of Day 0
    6. Any biological agent within 12 weeks of Day 0
    7. Metronidazole within 4 weeks of Day 0
    8. Receipt of any investigational agent within the 12 weeks prior to Day 0
    9. Antibacterial or oral antifungal agents within 4 weeks of Screen 2
    10. Interferon (IFN) therapy
    11. Anticoagulants
    12. Methotrexate
  8. Blood transfusion within the 12 weeks prior to Day 0
  9. Presence of any of the following abnormal laboratory parameters at Screen 1:

    1. Hemoglobin < 10.0 g/dL
    2. White Blood Count (WBC) < 4,000 or > 20,000/L (equivalent to WBC < 4 or > 20 x109/L)
    3. Platelets < 100,000 or > 800,000/L (equivalent to platelets < 100 or > 800 x109/L)
    4. Total bilirubin > 1.5 × Upper limit of normal (ULN)
    5. Alanine transaminase (ALT) > 2 × ULN
    6. Aspartate transaminase (AST) > 2 × ULN
    7. Alkaline phosphatase (ALK) > 1.5 × ULN
    8. Gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) > 1.5 × ULN
    9. Creatinine > 1.5 × ULN
  10. History of drug or alcohol abuse within one year prior to Day 0
  11. Inability to understand the nature and requirements of the study, or to comply with the study procedures or planned schedule of study visits
  12. Evidence of infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B, or hepatitis C
  13. Active infection with C. difficile, bacterial enteric pathogens, or pathogenic ova/parasites
  14. History of malignancy within the last 5 years, except for resected basal or squamous cell carcinoma, treated cervical dysplasia, or treated in situ cervical cancer Grade I
  15. History of colonic dysplasia
  16. Any social or medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude provision of informed consent, make participation in the study unsafe, complicate interpretation of study outcome data, or otherwise interfere with achieving the study objectives.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Trichuris suis ova (TSO)
Six doses of TSO orally over a ten-week period
Six doses of TSO orally over a ten-week period (e.g., every 2 weeks x 10 weeks for a total of 6 total doses)
Other Names:
  • T. suis ova
  • 7500 Trichuris suis ova (7500 TSO )
  • CNDO 201
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Six doses of TSO placebo orally over a ten-week period
Six doses of TSO placebo orally over a ten-week period (e.g., every 2 weeks x 10 weeks for a total of 6 total doses)
Other Names:
  • Trichuris suis ova (TSO) placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
Clinical response is defined as a reduction in the Mayo score of at least 3 points and at least a 30% reduction from Baseline, along with either a decrease from Baseline in the rectal bleeding subscore of more than 1 point or a rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1.
Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of Participants Who Achieved Remission at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
Remission is defined as a Mayo score of less than or equal to 1 with absence of rectal bleeding and endoscopy score of 0 or 1.
Week 12
Percent of Participants With Healed Colonic Mucosa at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
Healed colonic mucosa is defined as a Mayo endoscopy score of 0 or 1.
Week 12
Percent of Participants With a Modified Clinical Response
Time Frame: From Day 0 through time of first clinical response or end of follow-up, whichever comes first, up to 12 Weeks
Modified clinical response is defined as a reduction in the modified Mayo score (i.e., minus the endoscopy component) of at least 2 points from baseline.
From Day 0 through time of first clinical response or end of follow-up, whichever comes first, up to 12 Weeks
Time to Modified Clinical Response
Time Frame: From Baseline through the day that modified clinical response is reached. Week 16 is the last visit that the modified Mayo score is assessed.
Number of days to reach a modified clinical response. Modified clinical response is defined as a reduction in the modified Mayo score (i.e., minus the endoscopy component) of at least 2 points from baseline.
From Baseline through the day that modified clinical response is reached. Week 16 is the last visit that the modified Mayo score is assessed.
Percent of Participants With Colonoscopic Evidence of Visible Worm
Time Frame: From Day 0 through end of follow-up, up to 36 weeks
Stool evaluations for ova and parasites confirmed the absence of T. suis. If evidence suggested a presence of T. suis, a colonoscopy would be performed to confirm invasion with a visible worm.
From Day 0 through end of follow-up, up to 36 weeks
Percent of Participants With Increase in Diarrhea
Time Frame: From Day 0 through end of follow-up, up to 36 weeks
An increase in diarrhea is defined as an increase in the Mayo Score's Stool Frequency score by at least 1 point from baseline at any time during follow-up.
From Day 0 through end of follow-up, up to 36 weeks
Percent of Participants With Increase in Concurrent Ulcerative Colitis (UC) Medications or New Rescue Medications Added
Time Frame: From Day 0 through Week 16
New or increase in UC medications is defined as a need for dose-escalation of concurrent medications or need for rescue medications to treat UC through Week 16.
From Day 0 through Week 16

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Stephen Hanauer, MD, Northwestern University
  • Study Chair: Bana Jabri, MD, PhD, University of Chicago

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 24, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

October 1, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 17, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colitis, Ulcerative

Clinical Trials on Trichuris suis ova (TSO)

3
Subscribe