- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01961817
Airway Management Via the Retromolar Route Access
Airway Management Via the Retromolar Route Access - a Clinical Study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Management of the difficult airway is still an essential part of modern anaesthesia. Up to now, there have bee no clinical investigations comparing the intubation method via the retromolar route (RM), with the conventional intubation route (CM).
For the present clinical investigation, 100 patients undergoing elective surgery will be investigated in the General Hospital of Vienna when for the anaesthesia intubation is required. In both intubation methods (RM and CM) the anaesthesiologist will visually determine the Cormack & Lehane score in a randomly assigned sequence with and without a BURP-manoeuvre (= backwards, upwards and rightwards pressure). Thereafter intubation is performed in all patients by the CM method and if intubation fails the RM technique will be used. Of course, as per usual, every intubation trial is interrupted by a 20 second 100%-oxygen-ventilation period to reach a pulse oximetry oxygen saturation of at least 97% SpO2. Thereafter, if intubation fails again every other intubation technique will be applied, as necessary and called for.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Vienna, Austria, 1090
- Medical University of Vienna
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age > 18yr
- BMI < 30kg/m2
- Elective surgery
- Absence of at least one molar of the right mandible
Exclusion Criteria:
- Emergency patients
- Prevalence of reflux disease
- Toothless patients
- Diaphragmatic hernia
- Patient is not sober
- Ventilation problems during induction of anaesthesia
- Gastric regurgitation during induction of anaesthesia
- Patient with a tracheostomy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Retromolar
Patients in whom the vocal cord visualisation starts with the retromolar method, which has been randomized determined preoperatively. The second visualization then will be performed with the conventional method. |
For easier insertion of the laryngoscope the head of the patient will be turned to the left site.
Thereafter the blade (Miller) will be inserted into the mouth and pushed carefully as far as possible laterally to receive a direct view of the vocal cords.
Then the performing anesthesiologist determine the Cormack & Lehane score without and thereafter with a BURP (backward upward rightward pressure) maneuver.
The head of the patient will be positioned as usual.
After 2 minutes oxygen insufflation the laryngoscope will be inserted laterally to push the tongue to the left side in order to release the sight to the vocal cords.
Thereafter the anesthesiologist determines the Cormack & Lehane score without and thereafter with performance of the BURP (backward upward rightward pressure) maneuver.
|
|
Other: Convenvtional
Patients in whom the vocal cord visualisation starts with the conventional method, which has been randomized determined preoperatively. The second visualization then will be performed with the retromolar method. |
For easier insertion of the laryngoscope the head of the patient will be turned to the left site.
Thereafter the blade (Miller) will be inserted into the mouth and pushed carefully as far as possible laterally to receive a direct view of the vocal cords.
Then the performing anesthesiologist determine the Cormack & Lehane score without and thereafter with a BURP (backward upward rightward pressure) maneuver.
The head of the patient will be positioned as usual.
After 2 minutes oxygen insufflation the laryngoscope will be inserted laterally to push the tongue to the left side in order to release the sight to the vocal cords.
Thereafter the anesthesiologist determines the Cormack & Lehane score without and thereafter with performance of the BURP (backward upward rightward pressure) maneuver.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Comparison of vocal cord visualisation between the retromolar and the conventional method
Time Frame: After Intubation
|
In our present clinical trial we intend to compare the vocal cord visualisation by using the retromolar access compared to conventional intubation technique. Visualisation will be performed by randomized sequence and both methods will be performed in each patient. When no 100% visualisation of the vocal cords is achievable, a BURP (backward upward rightward pressure) manoeuvre will be performed. The same procedure will be performed for the another technique as well. For each trial, the anaesthesist has max. 30 seconds time for the vocal cord visualisation and scoring, which includes also the performance of the BURP-manoeuvre. Thereafter, and between each of the vocal cord visualizations as well, the patient will be ventilated by 100% oxygen for at least 20 seconds to reach at least 97% SpO2. Then intubation is performed in all patients by the conventional methode, and if intubation fails the retromolar technique, if possible. |
After Intubation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Tanoubi I, Drolet P, Donati F. Optimizing preoxygenation in adults. Can J Anaesth. 2009 Jun;56(6):449-66. doi: 10.1007/s12630-009-9084-z. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
- Weingart SD, Levitan RM. Preoxygenation and prevention of desaturation during emergency airway management. Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Mar;59(3):165-75.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.10.002. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
- Beckmann LA, Edwards MJ, Greenland KB. Differences in two new rigid indirect laryngoscopes. Anaesthesia. 2008 Dec;63(12):1385-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05777.x. No abstract available.
- Behringer EC, Kristensen MS. Evidence for benefit vs novelty in new intubation equipment. Anaesthesia. 2011 Dec;66 Suppl 2:57-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06935.x.
- Cooper RM. Complications associated with the use of the GlideScope videolaryngoscope. Can J Anaesth. 2007 Jan;54(1):54-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03021900.
- Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia. 1984 Nov;39(11):1105-11.
- De Beer DA, Williams DG, Mackersie A. An unexpected difficult laryngoscopy. Paediatr Anaesth. 2002 Sep;12(7):645-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.00857.x.
- Dhonneur G, Abdi W, Amathieu R, Ndoko S, Tual L. Optimising tracheal intubation success rate using the Airtraq laryngoscope. Anaesthesia. 2009 Mar;64(3):315-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05757.x.
- Henderson JJ. The use of paraglossal straight blade laryngoscopy in difficult tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia. 1997 Jun;52(6):552-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1997.129-az0125.x.
- Henderson JJ, Popat MT, Latto IP, Pearce AC; Difficult Airway Society. Difficult Airway Society guidelines for management of the unanticipated difficult intubation. Anaesthesia. 2004 Jul;59(7):675-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03831.x.
- Honarmand A, Safavi MR. Prediction of difficult laryngoscopy in obstetric patients scheduled for Caesarean delivery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008 Sep;25(9):714-20. doi: 10.1017/S026502150800433X. Epub 2008 May 9.
- Lee SS, Huang SH, Wu SH, Sun IF, Chu KS, Lai CS, Chen YL. A review of intraoperative airway management for midface facial bone fracture patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2009 Aug;63(2):162-6. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181855156.
- Levitan RM, Heitz JW, Sweeney M, Cooper RM. The complexities of tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy and alternative intubation devices. Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Mar;57(3):240-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.05.035. Epub 2010 Jul 31.
- Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD, Desai SP, Waraksa B, Freiberger D, Liu PL. A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1985 Jul;32(4):429-34. doi: 10.1007/BF03011357.
- Sahin M, Anglade D, Buchberger M, Jankowski A, Albaladejo P, Ferretti GR. Case reports: iatrogenic bronchial rupture following the use of endotracheal tube introducers. Can J Anaesth. 2012 Oct;59(10):963-7. doi: 10.1007/s12630-012-9763-z. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
- Scott J, Baker PA. How did the Macintosh laryngoscope become so popular? Paediatr Anaesth. 2009 Jul;19 Suppl 1:24-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.03026.x.
- Suzuki A, Abe N, Sasakawa T, Kunisawa T, Takahata O, Iwasaki H. Pentax-AWS (Airway Scope) and Airtraq: big difference between two similar devices. J Anesth. 2008;22(2):191-2. doi: 10.1007/s00540-007-0603-1. Epub 2008 May 25. No abstract available.
- Takahata O, Kubota M, Mamiya K, Akama Y, Nozaka T, Matsumoto H, Ogawa H. The efficacy of the "BURP" maneuver during a difficult laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg. 1997 Feb;84(2):419-21. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199702000-00033.
- Thong SY, Wong TG. Clinical uses of the Bonfils Retromolar Intubation Fiberscope: a review. Anesth Analg. 2012 Oct;115(4):855-66. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318265bae2. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
- Truong A, Truong DT. Retromolar fibreoptic orotracheal intubation in a patient with severe trismus undergoing nasal surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2011 May;58(5):460-3. doi: 10.1007/s12630-011-9474-x. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
- Turkstra TP, Pelz DM, Jones PM. Cervical spine motion: a fluoroscopic comparison of the AirTraq Laryngoscope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope. Anesthesiology. 2009 Jul;111(1):97-101. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a8649f.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1386/2013
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Airway Management
-
Royal Hospital, OmanNot yet recruitingDifficult Airway | Obesity Difficult Airway Airway Management
-
Bursa City HospitalEmre ULUSOYNot yet recruitingAirway Management | Difficult AirwayTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Kutahya Health Sciences UniversityCompletedAirway Management | Difficult Airway | Difficult Airway IntubationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
NHS TaysideTerminated
-
Akdeniz University HospitalCompletedAirway Management | Difficult Airway | Obstetric AnesthesiaTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Diskapi Teaching and Research HospitalNot yet recruitingAirway ManagementTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Thomas RivaThe Hospital for Sick Children; Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; Charite... and other collaboratorsRecruitingAirway ManagementUnited States, Australia, Switzerland, Italy, Canada, Germany, Brazil
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
University of MalayaActive, not recruiting
-
Akdeniz UniversityCompletedAirway ManagementTurkey (Türkiye)
Clinical Trials on Retromolar Vocal Cord Visualisation
-
Medical University of ViennaCompleted
-
Zagazig UniversityCompletedVocal Cord DysfunctionEgypt
-
University of AlbertaWithdrawn
-
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal...M.D. Anderson Cancer Center; London Health Sciences CentreActive, not recruitingLarynx Cancer | Glottis Tumor | Cancer NeckUnited States, Canada
-
National Cancer Institute, EgyptCairo UniversityRecruitingLarynx Cancer Stage I | Glottic CarcinomaEgypt
-
University Hospital OstravaCompletedLaryngeal Carcinoma | Subglottic Stenosis | Bilateral Vocal Cord ParesisCzechia
-
Olgun ElicinUniversity of Zurich; University Hospital, Geneva; University of Lausanne Hospitals and other collaboratorsRecruitingLarynx Cancer | Glottis TumorFrance, India, Switzerland
-
Pak Emirates Military HospitalCompletedParalysis of Vocal Cords or Larynx | Bilateral Vocal Cord ParalysisPakistan
-
Muhammad RashidCompletedVocal Cord Paralysis | Presbylarynges | Phonasthenia | Idiopathic Vocal Cord Paralysis | Ca LarynxPakistan
-
Eskisehir Osmangazi UniversityCompletedIntubation; Difficult or Failed | Difficult LaryngoscopyTurkey