Comparison of Acute Toxicity and Cost Between Whole Breast Irradiation With Sequential Boost and Simultaneous Integrated Boost After Breast Conserving Surgery. (SeqB vs SIB)

November 29, 2022 updated by: University Hospital, Ghent

Comparison of Acute Toxicity and Cost Between Whole Breast Irradiation With Sequential Boost and Simultaneous Integrated Boost After Breast Conserving Surgery

Whole breast irradiation (WBI) after breast conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer halves the recurrence risk and reduces the breast cancer death by about one sixth. A sequential boost (SeqB) dose to the tumour bed further improves local control, but also increases the risk of late skin toxicity and cosmetic changes. At Ghent University Hospital WBI is prescribed in 15 fractions of 2.67 Gy according to the START-B hypofractionation scheme. A sequential boost is typically given in 4 to 8 extra fractions which prolongs the overall treatment time. The boost dose can also be delivered within the 15 fractions of WBI, the so-called simultaneous integrated boost (SIB). SIB shortens the overall treatment time which is convenient for the patient and the radiotherapy department. In this study we wish to test the hypothesis of acceptable skin toxicity and reduced cost with SIB using hypofractionated prone intensity modulation radiotherapy IMRT with topographical dose painting, a technique recently developed in our group. Patients are randomized between SeqB and SIB.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

170

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ghent, Belgium, 9000
        • Ghent University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion criteria:

Female patients AND breast conserving surgery AND multidisciplinary decision of adjuvant WBI with a boost to the tumor bed AND age ≥ 18 years AND informed consent obtained, signed and dated before specific protocol procedures

Exclusion criteria

  • Mastectomy
  • Need for lymph node irradiation
  • No boost
  • Bilateral breast irradiation
  • Patient not able to reach or maintain the prone position
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Mental condition rendering the patient unable to understand the nature, scope and possible consequences of the study
  • Patient unlikely to comply with the protocol; i.e. uncooperative attitude, inability to return for follow-up visits, and unlikely to complete the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Minimal surgical margin 1 mm, conventional arm: seq boost
Minimal surgical margin of 1 mm, conventional arm with sequential boost (15 x 2.67 Gy WBI + 4 x 2.5 Gy boost).
Minimal surgical margin of 1 mm, conventional arm with sequential boost (15 x 2.67 Gy WBI + 4 x 2.5 Gy boost)
EXPERIMENTAL: Minimal surgical margin of 1 mm, experimental arm with SIB
Minimal surgical margin of 1 mm, experimental arm with SIB (15 x 2.67 Gy WBI and SIB 15 x 2.67-3.12 Gy)
Minimal surgical margin of 1 mm, experimental arm with SIB (15 x 2.67 Gy WBI and SIB 15 x 2.67-3.12 Gy)
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Minimal surgical margin <1 mm, conventional arm: seq boost
Minimal surgical margin < 1 mm, conventional arm with sequential boost (15 x 2.67 Gy WBI + 6 x 2.48 Gy boost)
Minimal surgical margin < 1 mm, conventional arm with sequential boost (15 x 2.67 Gy WBI + 6 x 2.48 Gy boost)
EXPERIMENTAL: Minimal surgical margin < 1 mm, experimental arm with SIB.
Minimal surgical margin < 1 mm, experimental arm with SIB (15 x 2.67 Gy WBI and SIB 15 x 2.67-3.33 Gy)
Minimal surgical margin < 1 mm, experimental arm with SIB (15 x 2.67 Gy WBI and SIB 15 x 2.67-3.33 Gy)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Degree of acute moist desquamation during or in the first 2 weeks after radiotherapy.
Time Frame: weekly during radiotherapy, 2 weeks after the end of radiotherapy.
Clinical inspection of the treated breast.
weekly during radiotherapy, 2 weeks after the end of radiotherapy.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Degree of acute skin toxicity.
Time Frame: Weekly during radiotherapy and 2 weeks after the end of radiotherapy.
Clinical inspection.
Weekly during radiotherapy and 2 weeks after the end of radiotherapy.
Degree of chronic skin toxicity and cosmesis after radiotherapy.
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years after radiotherapy.
Inspection, clinical evaluation, digital photographs.
2 weeks, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years after radiotherapy.
Quality of life after radiotherapy.
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years after radiotherapy.
QLQ C30 and QLQ BR23 quality of life questionnaires.
2 weeks, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years after radiotherapy.
Biomarker analysis.
Time Frame: Blood sample within 1 week before the start of radiotherapy
Blood sample
Blood sample within 1 week before the start of radiotherapy
Measurement of costs for the patient for the full treatment.
Time Frame: Over the period of radiotherapy treatment, with a maximum of 5 weeks.
Activity based costing models.
Over the period of radiotherapy treatment, with a maximum of 5 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 18, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

October 31, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2012/655

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Radiotherapy After Breast Conserving Surgery

3
Subscribe