Validation of a Urinary Biomarker as Diagnostic Tool for AKI in Sepsis

May 2, 2023 updated by: University Hospital, Ghent

Value of a Urinary Biomarker Set Obtained by a Proteomics Approach to Predict Acute Kidney Injury and Prognosis in Sepsis Patients: a Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND:

Early diagnosis and prognostication of acute kidney injury in patients with sepsis is key to further our understanding this disease and in the evaluation of new interventions for this condition. Many urinary biomarkers have been proposed, but no single one seems to consistently provide additional information on top of clinical and routine biochemical parameters. Some authors have proposed to use a panel of urinary biomarkers to increase the accuracy However, this approach has so far not been tested in a large group of patients with sepsis. In addition, newer and more performant analytical techniques have been developed that warrant testing in the clinical field.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

At least 150 consecutive patients admitted to a tertiary care intensive care unit (ICU) with sepsis will be included. After bladder catheterisation, urinary samples will be collected at time points 0, 4 hours and 24 hours after admission, and further daily on day 1-5. Samples will be immediately centrifuged and frozen at -80°C until analysis. Samples will be extracted by removing larger proteins (>20kDa) and de-salting step prior to mass spectrometry analysis. Investigators will use capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-MS) to assess urinary peptides predictive of AKI: 20 peptides constituting the AKI marker pattern previously established from a cohort of ICU patients. Simultaneously, samples will be analysed using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), an alternative platform to CE-MS, which is currently being developed for routine ICU use. A proof of concept of the technique involved has been successfully applied to a set of urine samples from patients diagnosed with diabetes presenting normoalbuminuria (controls) and macroalbuminuria (cases).

Clinical, demographic and biochemical data of patients will be collected during the first 5 days.

PATIENT OUTCOME

  • in the short term:

    • development of acute kidney injury according to RIFLE criteria
    • death
    • need for renal replacement therapy during ICU stay
  • on the longer term

    • death
    • need for renal replacement therapy
    • estimated glomerular filtration rate as calculated by MDRD at 3 months, 1 year and 2 years.

Using cut-offs , Receiver Operating Characteristics curves, negative and positive predictive value will be used to describe diagnostic performance of the biomarker panel alone, or in combination with basic clinical and/or routine biochemical parameters. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression for death will be used to evaluate prognostication value of the biomarker set.

In addition, new discriminatory cut-offs of proteomic patterns as determined by more recent proteomic analysis techniques will be determined in a training set (half of the cohort) and validated in the other half of the cohort. Using the MALDI-TOF MS platform, investigators will assess urinary peptides that were predictive of AKI in a training set (ca. 75 patients) with good diagnostic performance of the marker panel (accuracy above 0.8) . Performance of the biomarker panel will be assessed in a blinded test set of ca. 75 patients to evaluate validity of the model in AKI detection.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ghent, Belgium, 9000
        • Ghent University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

consecutive patients admitted to a tertiary care intensive care unit (ICU) with sepsis

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • sepsis at ICU

Exclusion Criteria:

  • na

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
patients at ICU with sepsis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
development of acute kidney injury according to RIFLE criteria
Time Frame: at 3 months after inclusion
at 3 months after inclusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in need for renal replacement therapy
Time Frame: at 3 months - 1 year and 2 year after inclusion
at 3 months - 1 year and 2 year after inclusion
change in estimated glomerular filtration rate as calculated by MDRD
Time Frame: at 3 months, 1 year and 2 years after inclusion
at 3 months, 1 year and 2 years after inclusion
death
Time Frame: 1 year and 2 years after inclusion

Using cut-offs determined by Metzger(1) et al, Receiver Operating Characteristics curves, negative and positive predictive value will be used to describe diagnostic performance of the biomarker panel alone, or in combination with basic clinical and/or routine biochemical parameters. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression for death will be used to evaluate prognostication value of the biomarker set.

In addition, new discriminatory cut-offs of proteomic patterns as determined by more recent proteomic analysis techniques will be determined in a training set (half of the cohort) and validated in the other half of the cohort. Using the MALDI-TOF MS platform, we will assess urinary peptides that were predictive of AKI in a training set (ca. 75 patients) with good diagnostic performance of the marker panel (accuracy above 0.8) . Performance of the biomarker panel will be assessed in a blinded test set of ca. 75 patients to evaluate validity of the model in AKI detection.

1 year and 2 years after inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 4, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 27, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

March 27, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 28, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

November 13, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2009/048

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis at Intensive Care Unit

Clinical Trials on Urinary proteomic analysis

3
Subscribe